Cited by 25Physical Education and PedagogyPhysical Activity and HealthChildren's Physical and Motor Development

Influence of a 2‐ to 6‐year physical education intervention on scholastic performance: The CHAMPS study‐DK

Open access
Bugge, Anna, Möller, Sören, Tarp, Jakob, Hillman, Charles H., Lima, Rodrigo Antunes, Gejl, Anne Kær, Klakk, Heidi, Wedderkopp, Niels·2018·Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of a school‐based intervention with a tripling of physical education (PE) lessons from two (90 minutes) to six lessons per week (270 minutes) on scholastic performance. This study is part of the CHAMPS study‐DK, a quasi‐experimental study that began in 2008. The intervention group consisted of six schools, and the control group consisted of four matched schools (mean age at baseline=8.4 years, kindergarten class fourth grade). Academic performance was extracted from the national test system from 2010 to 2014 (Math and Danish were measured at third and sixth, and second, fourth and sixth grades, respectively). Participants included 1888 students participating in at least one scholastic performance test. Linear mixed models were applied to test for differences between groups and adjusted for known confounders. No significant differences were observed between groups in the academic performance tests (control group reference); Danish second grade β=−1.34 (95% CI −9.90, 7.22), fourth grade β=0.22 (95% CI −6.12, 6.56), sixth grade β=1.03 (95% CI −5.02, 7.08), and all grades combined β=0.28 (95% CI −5.74, 6.31) and Math third grade β=−2.87 (95% CI −9.65, 3.90), sixth grade β=0.99 (95% CI −7.36, 9.34) and combined β=−1.20 (95% CI −8.10, 5.71). In conclusion, no significant differences were observed between intervention and control schools for scholastic performance. Importantly, there were no negative effects of additional PE on scholastic outcomes, despite more PE and longer school days for intervention children.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sms.12902

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the eight studies that analysed effects on academic performance, four used grades in academic subjects, three used standardised test results, one measured mastery of the basic facts test, and one analysed mathematics and reading performance with the speed test arithmetic and the 1 min test.

    “Of the eight studies that analysed the effects on academic performance, four used grades in academic subjects [40,48,49,50]; meanwhile, three studies utilised standardised test results [43,49,55], one took measurements of the student’s mastery of the basic facts test [47], and one analysed mathematics and reading performance with the speed test arithmetic and the 1 min test [45].”
  • Bugge et al. [55] found no significant (p > 0.5) difference between academic performance of groups receiving PE 6 days per week (4.5 h per week) and 2 days per week (1.5 h).

    “The study found no significant (p > 0.5) difference between academic performance of both groups following the intervention.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bugge, A., Möller, S., Tarp, J., Hillman, C. H., Lima, R. A., Gejl, A. K., Klakk, H., & Wedderkopp, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Ministry of Education (BR)
Corresponding author
Bugge, Anna
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05-22
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
228-236
ISSN
  • 0905-7188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0838
OpenAlex
W2609902022
Cited by
25
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • TrygFonden
  • Nordea-fonden
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
Keywords
physical education, school-based intervention, academic performance, mathematics achievement, elementary school students, extended school day
MeSH terms
Academic Success, Child, Denmark, Female, Humans, Male, Physical Education and Training, Schools, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review