The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mnemonic convergence in social networks: The emergent properties of cognition at a collective level
Open accessAbstract
Significance: Human memory is highly malleable. Because of this malleability, jointly remembering the past along with another individual often results in increased similarity between the conversational partners’ memories. We propose an approach that examines the conversation between a pair of participants as part of a larger network of social interactions that has the potential to reveal how human communities form collective memories. Empirical evidence indicating that dyadic-level conversational alignment processes give rise to community-wide shared memories is presented. We find that individual-level memory updating phenomena and social network structure are two fundamental factors that contribute to the emergence of collective memories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“And third, synchronization among individuals at a local level leads to the emergence of collective memories and beliefs at a community level (Coman et al., 2016).”
From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Coman et al., 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
The Psychology of Learning and Motivation
(2021) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(21)x0002-3 · Cited by 5,082
Borgatti, S. P. (2005) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.008 · Cited by 3,191
DiMaggio, P. (1997) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263 · Cited by 3,161
The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment
Centola, D. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185231 · Cited by 2,692
A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization
Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D. I., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., & Fowler, J. H. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11421 · Cited by 2,575
The Dissemination of Culture: A Model with Local Convergence and Global Polarization
Axelrod, R. (1997) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002797041002001 · Cited by 1,918
Borgatti, S. P. (2005) · Cited by 1,734
Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory.
Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1063 · Cited by 1,482
Collective Memory: The Two Cultures
Olick, J. K. (1999) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/0735-2751.00083 · Cited by 1,232
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 10.1207/S15327965PLI1403&4_21 · DOI
- N Mantel, The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27, 209–220 (1967).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gallagher, S. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198846345.001.0001 · Cited by 375
Active Forgetting: Adaptation of Memory by Prefrontal Control
Anderson, M. C., & Hulbert, J. C. (2021) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-072720-094140 · Cited by 279
“RIF has even been proposed as a key process shaping stable collective memories in social groups (Coman et al. 2016, Yamashiro &Hirst 2020).”
BackgroundCollective Memory from a Psychological Perspective
Hirst, W. C., Yamashiro, J. K., & Coman, A. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.010 · Cited by 285
“For instance, a study employing an innovative methodological advancement that allows for relatively large groups to be studied in experimental settings found that global mnemonic convergence was greater for nonclustered than clustered networks [67] (Figure 1).”
BackgroundSelf-citationComplex Contagions: A Decade in Review
Guilbeault, D., Becker, J. A., & Centola, D. M. (2018) · Computational social sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77332-2_1 · Cited by 229
The digital expansion of the mind: Implications of internet usage for memory and cognition.
Marsh, E. J., & Rajaram, S. (2019) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.11.001 · Cited by 186
Goldenberg, A., García, D., Halperin, E., & Gross, J. J. (2020) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721420901574 · Cited by 187
The dark side of meaning-making: How social exclusion leads to superstitious thinking
Graeupner, D., & Coman, A. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.10.003 · Cited by 162
Self-citationKlein, C., Clutton, P., & Dunn, A. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0225098 · Cited by 108
“Studies examining the structure of communication patterns within social networks have considered how homophily can affect the way beliefs spread and persist [47–48], how beliefs can be distorted through collective memory [49], and how it can exacerbate the spread of misinformation in particular [50].”
BackgroundIndividual Representation in a Community of Knowledge
Rabb, N., Fernbach, P. M., & Sloman, S. A. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.011 · Cited by 109
Collective minds: social network topology shapes collective cognition
Momennejad, I. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0315 · Cited by 105
Self-citationCharacterizing the mechanisms of social connection
Delgado, M. R., Fareri, D. S., & Chang, L. J. (2023) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.09.012 · Cited by 88
“We posit that achieving a mutual understanding of the world carries with it a shared affective signal(50) that serves as a reinforcer, contributing to both feelings of reward that enhance a connection with others and our collective cognition.(140) How do we know what another person is thinking or feeling?”
BackgroundFinding positive meaning in memories of negative events adaptively updates memory
Speer, M. E., Ibrahim, S., Schiller, D., & Delgado, M. R. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26906-4 · Cited by 81
Building a collective memory: the case for collective forgetting
Hirst, W. C., & Coman, A. (2018) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.002 · Cited by 72
Self-citationAbel, M., Umanath, S., Fairfield, B., Takahashi, M., Roediger, H. L., III, & Wertsch, J. V. (2019) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.02.001 · Cited by 95
American origins: Political and religious divides in US collective memory
Yamashiro, J. K., Engen, A. V., & Roediger, H. L., III (2019) · Memory Studies · doi:10.1177/1750698019856065 · Cited by 69
“Such clustering in social networks impacts not only relatively transient phenomena like the sharing of political Tweets, but also convergence onto collective memories, which become shared within but not between network clusters (Coman et al., 2016).”
BackgroundCultural selection shapes network structure
Smolla, M., & Akçay, E. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw0609 · Cited by 62
“On the other hand, networks with less efficient information diffusion can increase the chance to collectively discover a global maximum (23, 25), innovate a wider variety of solutions to a given problem (23, 26), or retain more information in a collective memory-retrieval situation (27).”
BackgroundThe Emerging Science of Interacting Minds
Wheatley, T. P., Thornton, M. A., Stolk, A., & Chang, L. J. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231200177 · Cited by 68
“Social-network analyses have already gained in popularity in social psychology and allied subfields in recent years (Baek et al., 2021; Coman et al., 2016; Morelli et al., 2017; Paluck et al., 2016).”
BackgroundSocial media interventions for precision public health: promises and risks
Dunn, A. G., Mandl, K. D., & Coiera, E. W. (2018) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-018-0054-0 · Cited by 62
Is there memory in the head, in the wild?
Barnier, A. J., & Hoskins, A. (2018) · Memory Studies · doi:10.1177/1750698018806440 · Cited by 57
“…al. (eds), 2018), has argued that macro-level social processes such as collective memory can and should be traced back to individual-level psychological processes; to individual patterns of memory accessibility albeit influenced by social interactions such as in conversations (Coman et al., 2016).”
BackgroundBridge ties bind collective memories
Momennejad, I., Duker, A., & Coman, A. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09452-y · Cited by 45
Self-citationAdvancing the ‘We’ Through Narrative
Gallagher, S., & Tollefsen, D. P. (2017) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-017-9452-1 · Cited by 42
Collective memory shapes the organization of individual memories in the medial prefrontal cortex
Gagnepain, P., Vallée, T., Heiden, S., Decorde, M., Gauvain, J., Laurent, A., Klein-Peschanski, C., Viader, F., Peschanski, D., & Eustache, F. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0779-z · Cited by 43
Cognition in a Social Context: A Social-Interactionist Approach to Emergent Phenomena
Vlasceanu, M., Enz, K., & Coman, A. (2018) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721418769898 · Cited by 67
“For instance, we found a sizable impact of conversations on the community’s mnemonic convergence with fairly limited social presence (i.e., computer-mediated chat interactions among participants; Coman et al., 2016).”
BackgroundSelf-citationA rubric for human-like agents and NeuroAI
Momennejad, I. (2022) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0446 · Cited by 42
Self-citationParadox of diversity in the collective brain
Schimmelpfennig, R., Razek, L., Schnell, E., & Muthukrishna, M. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0316 · Cited by 41
“For example, conformist learning and learning from common sources [131–133], norm enforcement [134,135], symbolic markers of in-group membership [136], collective memories [137,138], and the forces of cultural-group selection.”
BackgroundCollective memory: An hourglass between the collective and the individual
Cordonnier, A., Rosoux, V., Gijs, A.-S., & Luminet, O. (2022) · Memory Mind & Media · doi:10.1017/mem.2022.1 · Cited by 44
“…perspective: how memories are reinforced (usually through repetition across time, e.g., Roediger et al 2009); how they are shared across networks (Coman et al 2016); how they are manipulated (consciously or not) by other people or contaminated by information from other sources (Maswood and…”
BackgroundA social path to human-like artificial intelligence
Duéñez‐Guzmán, E. A., Sadedin, S., Wang, J. X., McKee, K. R., & Leibo, J. Z. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00754-x · Cited by 50
“Behavioural experiments show that topology influences the diffusion of innovations 73 , the propagation of beliefs 74 and collective memory dynamics 75 .”
Stone, C. B., Luminet, O., Jay, A. C. V., Klein, O., Licata, L., & Hirst, W. C. (2020) · Memory Studies · doi:10.1177/1750698019900949 · Cited by 34
Kashima, Y., Coman, A., Pauketat, J. V. T., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2019) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073919875215 · Cited by 36
Self-citationVlasceanu, M., & Coman, A. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.07.015 · Cited by 25
Self-citationHow Facebook, fake news and friends are warping your memory
Spinney, L. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/543168a · Cited by 29
Expanding cognition: A brief consideration of technological advances over the past 4000 years.
Yamashiro, J. K., & Roediger, H. L., III (2019) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.12.004 · Cited by 27
How do socio-ecological factors shape culture? Understanding the process of micro–macro interactions
Uchida, Y., Takemura, K. N., & Fukushima, S. (2019) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.033 · Cited by 30
The synchronization of collective beliefs: From dyadic interactions to network convergence.
Vlasceanu, M., Morais, M. J., Duker, A., & Coman, A. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000265 · Cited by 25
“Finally, we observe the effects, with sizes typical of similar paradigms (Coman et al., 2016; Murayama et al., 2014; Vlasceanu & Coman, 2018) lasting for at least one week.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationWalsh, J., Vaida, N., Coman, A., & Fiske, S. T. (2022) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/15291006231161337 · Cited by 26
“And third, synchronization among individuals at a local level leads to the emergence of collective memories and beliefs at a community level (Coman et al., 2016).”
BackgroundSelf-citationStone, C. B., & Jay, A. C. V. (2019) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3564 · Cited by 27
Consumo de información en redes sociales durante la crisis de la COVID-19 en España.
Rico, C. M. L., Esteban, J. L. G., & Hernández-Martínez, A. (2020) · Revista de Comunicación y Salud · doi:10.35669/rcys.2020.10(2).461-481 · Cited by 23
“Diversos estudios muestran como contar repetidamente los hechos los afianza en nuestra memoria (Coman et al., 2016) pero ¿qué ocurre si lo que repetimos es falso?. Daniel Schacter, que estudia la memoria en la Universidad de Harvard en Cambridge, Massachusetts, afirma que: "El desarrollo de…”
BackgroundThe impact of information sources on COVID-19 knowledge accumulation and vaccination intention
Vlasceanu, M., & Coman, A. (2022) · International Journal of Data Science and Analytics · doi:10.1007/s41060-021-00307-8 · Cited by 23
“Critically, individual level effects have been found to propagate in social networks [52, 53], and social networks can amplify the spread of behaviors that are both harmful and beneficial during an epidemic [54].”
BackgroundSelf-citationGrysman, A., Harris, C. B., Barnier, A. J., & Savage, G. R. (2019) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2019.1673428 · Cited by 22
Maswood, R., Luhmann, C. C., & Rajaram, S. (2021) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2021.1928222 · Cited by 26
“…mainly as overlapping information that a group of individuals remember or forget (e.g., Brown et al., 2009; Choi et al., 2014; Choi et al., 2017; Coman et al., 2016; Congleton & Rajaram, 2014; Cuc et al., 2006; Cuc et al., 2007; Geana et al., 2019; Luhmann & Rajaram, 2015; Mommenejad et al.,…”
InfluentialVlasceanu, M., Dyckovsky, A. M., & Coman, A. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231185776 · Cited by 23
“For example, an initial assessment of whether a set of beliefs is shared by the members of a community can be performed by computing the degree of synchronization or alignment between the different individuals within a community (Coman et al., 2016; Vlasceanu et al., 2020).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Multiple Perspectives Theory of Mental States in Communication
Heller, D., & Brown‐Schmidt, S. (2023) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13322 · Cited by 26
AI imaginaries shape technological identity and digital futures
Zhong, B., Song, Y., Feng, G. C., Shi, J. J., Zhu, Y., Xie, L., Zhou, W. A., Yu, S.-N., Lu, Y., Qin, Y., et al. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2025.108682 · Cited by 28
Learning in a Family Business Through Intermarriage: A Rhetorical History Perspective
McAdam, M., Clinton, E. A., Hamilton, E., & Gartner, W. B. (2023) · Family Business Review · doi:10.1177/08944865231157040 · Cited by 17
“…variations in families and businesses when studying family business, we suggest that a family business can be conceived of as a mnemonic community (Coman et al., 2016; Coraiola & Murcia, 2020; Feldman & Feldman, 2006; Hjorth & Dawson, 2016; Suddaby & Jaskiewicz, 2020), that is, families can be…”
BackgroundNetwork Structure Impacts the Synchronization of Collective Beliefs
Vlasceanu, M., Morais, M. J., & Coman, A. (2021) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/15685373-12340120 · Cited by 16
Self-citationHirst, W. C., & Sozer, E. E. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-26556-4_37 · Cited by 16
An experimental study of the formation of collective memories in social networks
Geana, A., Duker, A., & Coman, A. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.05.001 · Cited by 15
“To construct a mnemonic sensitivity score, we followed Coman et al. (2016) and computed reinforcement/ suppression (R/S) scores for each of the 34 studied items.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationA framework for vicarious and collective memory, future projections and narrative identity
Thomsen, D. K., Fıvush, R., Coman, A., Hirst, W. C., Luminet, O., & Pillemer, D. B. (2025) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-025-00429-x · Cited by 20
“Social networks that are divided into cliques are less likely to converge on a representation than are social networks without cliques 111 (Fig.”
Self-citationFrom Symbols to Embeddings: A Tale of Two Representations in Computational Social Science
Chen, H., Yang, C. H., Zhang, X., Liu, Z., Sun, M., & Jin, J. (2021) · Journal of Social Computing · doi:10.23919/jsc.2021.0011 · Cited by 19
Quantifying the selective forgetting and integration of ideas in science and technology.
Candia, C., & Uzzi, B. (2021) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000863 · Cited by 17
“Some of these factors go from psychological phenomena (e.g., moral emotions elicited by particular messages (Brady et al., 2017)) to socio-structural phenomena (e.g., the communities’ underlying network structures in which the cultural products diffuse (Coman et al., 2016)).”
BackgroundMaking the Right Decision: Intensifying the Worth of a Chosen Option
Higgins, E. T., Nakkawita, E., Rossignac‐Milon, M., Pinelli, F., & Jun, Y. (2020) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1194 · Cited by 14
“Importantly, this effect can occur in large-scale social networks, especially if these are clustered (Coman et al., 2016).”
Political and nonpolitical belief change elicits behavioral change.
Vlasceanu, M., McMahon, C. E., Bavel, J. J. V., & Coman, A. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000455 · Cited by 12
Self-citationRelational AI: Facilitating Intergroup Cooperation with Socially Aware Conversational Support
Claggett, E. L., Kraut, R. E., & Shirado, H. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713757 · Cited by 23
“Research by Coman et al. suggests that when people are encouraged to communicate with others who have different perspectives, they can reach a consensus [30].”
Editors’ Introduction: Remembering With Others: Conversational Dynamics and Mnemonic Outcomes
Bietti, L. M., & Stone, C. B. (2019) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12443 · Cited by 11
Predicting the decay of collective memory
Coman, A. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0480-7 · Cited by 10
Self-citationPeople are represented and remembered through their relationships with othersPreprint
Jolly, E., Sadhukha, S., Iqbal, M., Molani, Z., Walsh, T., Manning, J. R., & Chang, L. J. (2023) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/bw9r2 · Cited by 12
Self-views converge during enjoyable conversations
Welker, C. L., Wheatley, T. P., Cason, G., Gorman, C., & Meyer, M. L. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2321652121 · Cited by 10
Oxytocin in Human Social Network Cooperation
Han, X., & Ma, Y. (2024) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/10738584241293366 · Cited by 10
MEMCONS: How Contemporaneous Note‐Taking Shapes Memory for Conversation
Brown‐Schmidt, S., Jaeger, C. B., Evans, M. J., & Benjamin, A. S. (2023) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13271 · Cited by 7
Collaborative Remembering and Collective Memory
Rajaram, S. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190917982.013.75 · Cited by 7
The Emotion-Induced Belief-Amplification Effect.
Vlasceanu, M., Goebel, J., & Coman, A. (2020) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 6
Self-citationWhat is the relationship between collective memory and metacognition?
Lund, A. E., & Russell, C. (2022) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2022.07.006 · Cited by 6
Forgetting in Social Chains: The Impact of Cognition on Information Propagation
Drost-Lopez, J., & Coman, A. (2018) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/15685373-12340036 · Cited by 6
“…is, thus, to provide an empirically tractable framework to investigate the impact of Downloaded from Brill.com11/07/2022 04:29:13PM via Princeton University Library Journal of Cognition and Culture 18 (2018) 390–409 socio-cognitive processes on large-scale mnemonic convergence (Coman et al., 2016).”
BackgroundSelf-citationShen, S., Gong, Z., Zhou, B., & Słowiński, R. (2025) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102844 · Cited by 5
How can governments respond to policy bubbles driven by dysfunctional emotions?
Maor, M. H. (2025) · Policy and Society · doi:10.1093/polsoc/puaf008 · Cited by 5
Interpersonal neural synchronization underlies mnemonic similarity during collaborative remembering
Zhang, H., Wang, H., Long, Y., Jiang, Y., & Lu, C. (2023) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108732 · Cited by 5
How Collective Memories Emerge
Rajaram, S., Peña, T., & Greeley, G. D. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197568675.003.0020 · Cited by 5
Remembering conversation in group settings
Brown‐Schmidt, S., Jaeger, C. B., Lord, K. M., & Benjamin, A. S. (2024) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-024-01630-8 · Cited by 4
“Using these similarity metrics, we can calculate a measure of mnemonic similarity that quantifies the similarity of recall by taking into account the idea units that are uniformly recalled or not (indicators of similarity) or recalled by some but not others (Coman et al., 2016).”
Beer, J. J. D., & Wyk, B.-E. V. (2019) · NWU self-directed learning series · doi:10.4102/aosis.2019.bk133.05 · Cited by 4
Rice Landrace Conservation Practice through Collective Memory and Toraja Foodways
Ranteallo, I. C., Alam, M., Nasution, A. H., Kolopaking, L. M., Lubis, D. P., Zuhud, E. A. M., & Andilolo, I. R. (2020) · Society · doi:10.33019/society.v8i2.211 · Cited by 4
“Individual-level memory updating phenomena and social network structure are two fundamental factors that contribute to the emergence of collective memories (Coman et al., 2016).”
BackgroundFrom individual to collective: Collective memory from a psychological perspective
Yaojun, G. E., & Li, H. (2021) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2021.02073 · Cited by 4
“…1 （4）记忆的网络聚合 集体记忆的形成是个体记忆不断实现“共享”的过程。如果将“对话”视为 社会交流的一部分，那么伴随着这种心理机制的扩展，它就会重塑一个社群的集 体记忆。目前集体记忆心理学研究虽以“两人配对”的对话语境为主，但为了进 一步检验相关机制在大群体中的适用性，心理学家扩大了样本范围，不仅验证了 记忆的网络聚合现象，而且揭示了其形成原因以及群体规模、网络结构特征等对 记忆产生的影响（Stone et al., 2010; Coman et al., 2012; Coman et al., 2016）。 关于记忆网络聚合的原因，可以归因于对话引起的强化和检索诱发遗忘。 Coman 和 Hirst…”
Vlasceanu, M., & Coman, A. (2022) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3972 · Cited by 5
Self-citationSAMPL: The Spreading Activation and Memory PLasticity ModelPreprint
Sievers, B., & Momennejad, I. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/778563 · Cited by 3
Self-citationLaw, K. F., Syropoulos, S., Young, L., & O’Connor, B. B. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-21466-9 · Cited by 3
Vlasceanu, M., Dudı́k, M., & Momennejad, I. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533069 · Cited by 6
“Understanding the organizational structure of a social network has been shown to be instrumental in identifying the relative influence of each individual within the community [41, 74] and predicting the spread of memories [23, 54], practices [22], and behaviors [19] through the community.”
BackgroundSelf-citationCollective cognition based analysis of community structure discovery algorithms
Xiong, P., Liu, Z., Wei, P., & Liu, T. (2024) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2024.101241 · Cited by 3
Heuristics Facilitates the Evolution of Transitive Inference and Social Hierarchy in a Large Group
Doi, K., & Nakamaru, M. (2023) · Acta Biotheoretica · doi:10.1007/s10441-023-09459-5 · Cited by 3
Sozer, E. E., Yamashiro, J. K., & Hirst, W. C. (2023) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-023-01472-w · Cited by 4
“…analytical eye on one-off conversational interactions, the effects of communication on mnemonic convergence have at times been examined in broader contexts, for instance, across social networks and across time (Coman et al., 2016; Momennejad et al., 2019; Momennejad, 2022; Vlasceanu et al., 2018).”
Bietti, L. M., & Mayor, E. (2023) · Memory Mind & Media · doi:10.1017/mem.2023.5 · Cited by 3
“(2019) using the chat environment presented by Coman et al .”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialModalities and Criteria of Shared Memory
Candau, J. (2023) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/727893 · Cited by 4
“The ninth criterion is group conformation (C9), that is, the structure of the social networks that individuals are part of (Coman et al. 2016).”
BackgroundGallagher, S. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198846345.003.0006 · Cited by 3
Whitley, D. S. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96942-4_2 · Cited by 2
Abel, M., Umanath, S., & Barzykowski, K. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197568675.003.0010 · Cited by 2
Toward a Dynamical—in the Field—Approach to Collective Memory
Coman, A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197568675.003.0019 · Cited by 2
Self-citationCollective memory from a cognitive perspective
Hirst, W. C., Cadwell, O. G., Stackow, T., Vasquez, A. N., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102145 · Cited by 2
Gallagher, S. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198846345.003.0007 · Cited by 2
Theoretical Perspectives from Other Disciplines
Finley, J. R., Naaz, F., & Goh, F. W. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-99169-6_6 · Cited by 2
The More, the Merrier? A Study on Group Structure's Impact on Individual and Collective Memory
Xiao, Q., Luo, X., Chu, Y., Tang, W., Zhang, Y., Xu, H., & Liu, X. (2025) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.70064 · Cited by 1
Yalçın, M. G., & Önal, E. S. (2025) · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/casp.70142 · Cited by 4
“Prior research has shown that group conversations (Edwards and Middleton 1986, 1988) can alter the memories of both speakers and listeners (Hirst and Echterhoff 2012), leading to mnemonic convergence within social networks (Coman et al. 2016; Yamashiro and Hirst 2014).”
Sesele, K., & Marais, L. (2025) · Resources Policy · doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105725 · Cited by 1
Social Support for Causal Coherence
Grysman, A. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009492140.010 · Cited by 1
Gündelik Hayatın Sosyolojisi: Toplumsal Hafıza ve Anılar
Akbaş, A. (2025) · Habitus toplumbilim dergisi · doi:10.62156/habitus.1711039 · Cited by 1
Collective Memory Is More Than What We Remember: Quantifying Interconnections
Rajaram, S., Greeley, G. D., & Jin, J. (2026) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09637214251398487 · Cited by 1
Assessing How Fact‐Checks Influence Accuracy and Consensus Judgments: Evidence From the Olympics
Wack, M., Allan, J. N., Boatwright, B., & Cranmer, G. A. (2026) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.70293 · Cited by 2
“The dynamics of social influence are further elucidated by Coman et al. ( 2016 ), who discuss the concept of mnemonic convergence in social networks.”
Bilişsel Psikoloji Bakış Açısından Sosyal Etkileşimin Toplumsal Bellek Üzerindeki Rolü
Mutlutürk, A. (2020) · Psikoloji Çalışmaları / Studies in Psychology · doi:10.26650/sp2019-0063 · Cited by 2
Roediger, H. L., III, & Yamashiro, J. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108290876.008 · Cited by 1
Gallagher, S. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198846345.003.0001 · Cited by 1
Effects of memory conversation and group identity on collective memory
Qianlin, G. U. O., & Jian, G. U. A. N. (2023) · Acta Psychologica Sinica · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2023.01016 · Cited by 2
“数据分析采用 SPSS 22.0 软件。首先, 根据材料的 6 个文本内容, 已划分出每个文本包 含的总记忆项目数(20~22 个)。然后, 根据每个被试对话前回忆和对话后回忆的文本材料, 判 定被试记住的记忆项目数(对话前记作“M-Pre”, 对话后记作“M-Post”)。研究采用个体和集体 两种水平的记忆结果作为因变量, 其中个体水平记忆结果为自由回忆项目数, 同时为了量化 集体记忆的结果, 参考已有研究, 采用记忆收敛度(MC-Pre、MC-Post)、共同记住(RR-Pre、 RR-Post)和共同忘记(FF-Pre、FF-Post)项目数的计算方式来代表集体记忆分数(Stone…”
InfluentialSauteur, T. (2023) · Cortica · doi:10.26034/cortica.2023.4208 · Cited by 1
Durability of retrieval-induced forgetting: Effects of different practice schedules
Sozer, E. E., Fagin, M. M., Meksin, R., & Hirst, W. C. (2024) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-024-01634-4 · Cited by 1
“These studies found that the strength of SSRIF changes as a function of these demands (Coman et al., 2016; Koppel et al., 2014; Mao et al., 2021).”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Coman, A., Momennejad, I., Drach, R. D., & Geana, A.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- State University of New York (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2016-06-29
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 8171-8176
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC4961177
- OpenAlex
- W2471181430
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 7.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Memory, History, Trauma, Identity
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Keywords
- collective memory, social networks, information sharing, memory updating, emergent properties, computer-mediated communication, information dissemination
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Cognition, Communication, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Recall, Young Adult, Social Networking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
