Cited by 121Misinformation and Its ImpactsDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsDeception detection and forensic psychology

Perceived social presence reduces fact-checking

Open access
Jun, Youjung, Meng, Rachel, Johar, Gita Venkataramani·2017·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: The dissemination of unverified content (e.g., “fake” news) is a societal problem with influence that can acquire tremendous reach when propagated through social networks. This article examines how evaluating information in a social context affects fact-checking behavior. Across eight experiments, people fact-checked less often when they evaluated claims in a collective (e.g., group or social media) compared with an individual setting. Inducing momentary vigilance increased the rate of fact-checking. These findings advance our understanding of whether and when people scrutinize information in social environments. In an era of rapid information diffusion, identifying the conditions under which people are less likely to verify the content that they consume is both conceptually important and practically relevant.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1700175114

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jun, Y., Meng, R., & Johar, G. V.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2017-05-22
Volume
114
Issue
23
Pages
5976-5981
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2619683052
Cited by
121
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
FWCI
39.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • ACR North American Advances
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
perceived social presence, fact-checking, social media, sustained attention, information evaluation, social evaluation
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Research, Social Perception, Internet, Information Dissemination, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review