Cited by 878Behavioral Health and InterventionsEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator

Higgins, E. Tory, Shah, James, Friedman, Ronald·1997·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.515

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The premise behind reaction-time measures is that higher accessibility leads to more efficient approach and avoidance tendencies unconsciously.

    “The premise behind this approach is that higher accessibility leads to more efficient approach and avoidance tendencies unconsciously.”

    From The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as Higgins, Shah, & Friedman, 1997

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Higgins, E. T., Shah, J., & Friedman, R.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1997
Volume
72
Issue
3
Pages
515-525
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W4296148530
Cited by
878
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 44
FWCI
16.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
goal achievement, emotional responses, regulatory focus, moderator effects, approach-avoidance motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review