The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inhibitory engrams in perception and memory
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Nervous systems use excitatory cell assemblies to encode and represent sensory percepts. Similarly, synaptically connected cell assemblies or “engrams” are thought to represent memories of past experience. Multiple lines of recent evidence indicate that brain systems create and use inhibitory replicas of excitatory representations for important cognitive functions. Such matched “inhibitory engrams” can form through homeostatic potentiation of inhibition onto postsynaptic cells that show increased levels of excitation. Inhibitory engrams can reduce behavioral responses to familiar stimuli, thereby resulting in behavioral habituation. In addition, by preventing inappropriate activation of excitatory memory engrams, inhibitory engrams can make memories quiescent, stored in a latent form that is available for context-relevant activation. In neural networks with balanced excitatory and inhibitory engrams, the release of innate responses and recall of associative memories can occur through focused disinhibition. Understanding mechanisms that regulate the formation and expression of inhibitory engrams in vivo may help not only to explain key features of cognition but also to provide insight into transdiagnostic traits associated with psychiatric conditions such as autism, schizophrenia, and posttraumatic stress disorder.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The recontextualized memory, in which the trauma is now located in a safer temporal and spatial context, may act as an inhibitory version of the original traumatic memory [50], which is now available to compete with the original traumatic memory.”
From Memory and Forgetting (2018) · cites this paper as [50]
Citations
Cites
Shrestha, S., & Offer, S. M. (2016) · Medical Epigenetics · doi:10.1159/000444713 · Cited by 8,951
A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder
Ehlers, A., & Clark, D. M. (2000) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00123-0 · Cited by 6,147
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science
Clark, A. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000477 · Cited by 5,924
Rao, R. P. N., & Ballard, D. H. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/4580 · Cited by 5,483 · cited 1×
“…created by local EI balancing mechanisms, the framework we propose also naturally accommodates inhibitory representations constructed through potential alternative mechanisms (Clark, 2013; Cooke et al., 2015; Kogo and Trengove, 2015; Ramaswami, 2014; Rao and Ballard, 1999; Wacongne et al., 2012).”
BackgroundThe Organization of Behavior; A Neuropsychological Theory.
Attneave, F., B., M., & Hebb, D. O. (1950) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1418888 · Cited by 5,146
The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory
(1950) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1950.02910470083028 · Cited by 4,272
Model of autism: increased ratio of excitation/inhibition in key neural systems
Rubenstein, J. L. R., & Merzenich, M. M. (2003) · Genes, Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1034/j.1601-183x.2003.00037.x · Cited by 2,768
Habituation: a model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior
Thompson, R. F., & Spencer, W. A. (1966) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0022681 · Cited by 2,608 · cited 6×
“This provides an explanation for the psychological phenomena of dishabituation and attentional override, two defining properties of habituation (Ramaswami, 2014; Rankin et al., 2009; Thompson and Spencer, 1966).”
BackgroundInfluentialNeocortical excitation/inhibition balance in information processing and social dysfunction
Yizhar, O., Fenno, L. E., Prigge, M., Schneider, F., Davidson, T. J., O’Shea, D. J., Sohal, V. S., Goshen, I., Finkelstein, J., Paz, J. T., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10360 · Cited by 2,454
Chaos in Neuronal Networks with Balanced Excitatory and Inhibitory Activity
van Vreeswijk, C., & Sompolinsky, H. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5293.1724 · Cited by 1,831
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- R Semon, Engraphic action of stimuli on the individual. The Mneme, ed TbL Simon (George Allen and Unwin, London, 1921).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Memory engrams: Recalling the past and imagining the future
Josselyn, S. A., & Tonegawa, S. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw4325 · Cited by 1,087
Beyond the Status Quo: A Role for Beta Oscillations in Endogenous Content (Re)Activation
Spitzer, B., & Haegens, S. (2017) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0170-17.2017 · Cited by 667
Memory Allocation: Mechanisms and Function
Josselyn, S. A., & Frankland, P. W. (2018) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-080317-061956 · Cited by 239
Getting rid of visual distractors: the why, when, how, and where
Chelazzi, L., Marini, F., Pascucci, D., & Turatto, M. (2019) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.02.004 · Cited by 200
Forgetting as a form of adaptive engram cell plasticity
Ryan, T. J., & Frankland, P. W. (2022) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-021-00548-3 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Barron, H. C., Vogels, T. P., Behrens, T. E., & Ramaswami, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
- Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (IN)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2017-06-13
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 6666-6674
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC5495250
- OpenAlex
- W2626706140
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- John Fell Fund, University of Oxford (John Fell OUP Research Fund) (153/046)
- Wellcome Trust (WT100000, WT104765MA)
- James S. McDonnell Foundation (JSMF) (JSMF220020372)
- Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) (15/IA/3123)
- Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India (DAE) (Core Funds to TIFR/NCBS)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- memory engrams, cell assemblies, habituation, latent memory, disinhibition, perception, excitation-inhibition balance, autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, post-traumatic stress disorder, transdiagnostic traits
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Autistic Disorder, Cognition, Humans, Memory, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Perception, Schizophrenia, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review