The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rethinking people’s conceptions of mental life
Open accessAbstract
Significance: How do ordinary people make sense of mental life? Pioneering work on the dimensions of mind perception has been widely interpreted as evidence that lay people perceive two fundamental components of mental life: experience and agency. However, using a method better suited to addressing this question, we discovered a very different conceptual structure. Our four studies consistently revealed three components of mental life—suites of capacities related to the body, the heart, and the mind—with each component encompassing related aspects of both experience and agency. This body–heart–mind framework distinguishes itself from the experience–agency framework by its clear and importantly different implications for dehumanization, moral reasoning, and other important social phenomena.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, the correspondence between these dimensions and phenomenality is not clear (Sytsma 2014) and more recent work has found evidence for alternative structures that cut across this distinction (e.g. Weisman et al. 2017, Malle 2019).”
From Folk psychological attributions of consciousness to large language models (2024) · cites this paper as Weisman et al. 2017
Citations
Cites
Dehumanization: An integrative review
Haslam, N. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4 · Cited by 2,919 · cited 1×
“If experience and agency are understood to be the two components of mental life, as has been widely assumed, it is logical to suppose that there may be two corresponding forms of dehumanization: the denial of experience, and the denial of agency (17).”
BackgroundGray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1134475 · Cited by 2,342 · cited 11×
“We followed the original analyses as described in the supplementary materials for the original study (1) as exactly as possible: We first computed mean relative ratings for each of the 13 characters, for each of the 18 mental capacities, and then conducted a PCA via singular-value decomposition on…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-6626 · Cited by 2,234
Bukimi no tani [the uncanny valley]
Mori, M. (1970) · Energy · Cited by 1,485
Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality
Gray, K., Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2012) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2012.651387 · Cited by 1,008
Cognitive Development: Foundational Theories Of Core Domains
Wellman, H. M., & Gelman, S. A. (1992) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.002005 · Cited by 986
Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley
Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.007 · Cited by 941 · cited 2×
“’s work suggests that people perceive robots to be very low on experience and middling on agency (1) and that increasing people’s perceptions of robots’ experience (but not agency) elicits feelings of uncanniness (3).”
BackgroundNot yet human: Implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences.
Goff, P. A., Eberhardt, J. L., Williams, M. J., & Jackson, M. C. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.292 · Cited by 880
Social cognitive development : frontiers and possible futures
Flavell, J. H., & Ross, L. D. (1981) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · Cited by 741
More than a body: Mind perception and the nature of objectification.
Gray, K. J., Knobe, J., Sheskin, M., Bloom, P., & Barrett, L. F. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025883 · Cited by 304
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- M Mori, The uncanny valley. Energy 7, 33–35 (1970).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A multidimensional conception and measure of human-robot trust
Malle, B. F., & Ullman, D. L. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819472-0.00001-0 · Cited by 282
Human or virtual: How influencer type shapes brand attitudes
Ozdemir, O., Kolfal, B., Messinger, P. R., & Rizvi, S. A. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107771 · Cited by 239
Nummenmaa, L., Hari, R., Hietanen, J. K., & Glerean, E. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1807390115 · Cited by 216
Holding Robots Responsible: The Elements of Machine Morality
Bigman, Y., Waytz, A. G., Alterovitz, R., & Gray, K. J. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.008 · Cited by 185
Algorithmic discrimination causes less moral outrage than human discrimination
Bigman, Y. E., Wilson, D., Arnestad, M. N., Waytz, A., & Gray, K. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0001250 · Cited by 198
Mental State Attribution to Robots: A Systematic Review of Conceptions, Methods, and Findings
Thellman, S., de Graaf, M. M. A., & Ziemke, T. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3526112 · Cited by 185
Artificial Intelligence, Trust, and Perceptions of Agency
Puranam, P., & Vanneste, B. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2022.0041 · Cited by 215
Drivers are blamed more than their automated cars when both make mistakes
Awad, E., Levine, S., Kleiman-Weiner, M., Dsouza, S., Tenenbaum, J., Shariff, A. F., Bonnefon, J.-F., & Rahwan, I. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0762-8 · Cited by 116
Yun, J. H., Lee, E., & Kim, D. H. (2021) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21445 · Cited by 112
Trait knowledge forms a common structure across social cognition
Stolier, R. M., Hehman, E., & Freeman, J. B. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0800-6 · Cited by 94
People's Explanations of Robot Behavior Subtly Reveal Mental State Inferences
de Graaf, M. M. A., & Malle, B. F. (2019) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri.2019.8673308 · Cited by 100
Similarities and differences in concepts of mental life among adults and children in five cultures
Weisman, K., Legare, C. H., Smith, R., Dzokoto, V. A. A., Aulino, F., Ng, E., Dulin, J. C., Ross-Zehnder, N., Brahinsky, J., & Luhrmann, T. M. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01184-8 · Cited by 91
Self-citationFolk psychological attributions of consciousness to large language models
Colombatto, C., & Fleming, S. M. (2024) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niae013 · Cited by 96
“However, the correspondence between these dimensions and phenomenality is not clear (Sytsma 2014) and more recent work has found evidence for alternative structures that cut across this distinction (e.g. Weisman et al. 2017, Malle 2019).”
BackgroundTrust in Human and Virtual Live Streamers: The Role of Integrity and Social Presence
Wang, K., Wu, J., Sun, Y., Chen, J., Pu, Y., & Qi, Y. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2279410 · Cited by 99
Young, A., & Monroe, A. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103870 · Cited by 78
Social robots as depictions of social agents
Clark, H. H., & Fischer, K. (2022) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x22000668 · Cited by 94
Schiller, D., Yu, A. N. C., Alia‐Klein, N., Becker, S., Cromwell, H. C., Dolcos, F., Eslinger, P. J., Frewen, P., Kemp, A. H., Pace-Schott, E. F., et al. (2023) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105450 · Cited by 89
Children’s perceptions of the moral worth of live agents, robots, and inanimate objects
Sommer, K., Nielsen, M., Draheim, M., Redshaw, J., Vanman, E. J., & Wilks, M. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2019.06.009 · Cited by 72
Trust Repair Strategies with Self-Driving Vehicles: An Exploratory Study
Kohn, S. C., Quinn, D., Pak, R., de Visser, E. J., & Shaw, T. H. (2018) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931218621254 · Cited by 64
Rottman, J., Crimston, C. R., & Syropoulos, S. (2021) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12967 · Cited by 58
A growth mindset about human minds promotes positive responses to intelligent technology
Dang, J., & Liu, L. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104985 · Cited by 59
(2019) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 50
Attributions of social interactions: Driving among self-driving vs. conventional vehicles
Lee, Y., Momen, A., & LaFreniere, J. (2021) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101631 · Cited by 46
Santoro, E., & Monin, B. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104464 · Cited by 51
Understanding dehumanization: The role of agency and communion
Formanowicz, M., Goldenberg, A., Saguy, T., Pietraszkiewicz, A., Walker, M., & Gross, J. J. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.04.003 · Cited by 43
When is it wrong to eat animals? The relevance of different animal traits and behaviours
Leach, S., Sutton, R. M., Dhont, K., & Douglas, K. M. (2020) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2718 · Cited by 44
Sevillano, V., & Fiske, S. T. (2019) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430219851560 · Cited by 39
Koban, K., & Banks, J. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.108098 · Cited by 38
MacCormack, J. K., Henry, T. R., Davis, B. M., Oosterwijk, S., & Lindquist, K. A. (2019) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000699 · Cited by 47
Identifying psychological features of robots that encourage and discourage trust
Plaks, J. E., Rodriguez, L. B., & Ayad, R. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107301 · Cited by 38
Who Wants to Grant Robots Rights?
de Graaf, M. D., Hindriks, F., & Hindriks, K. (2021) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.1145/3434074.3446911 · Cited by 33
Mind the Machines: Applying Implicit Measures of Mind Perception to Social Robotics
Li, Z., Terfurth, L., Woller, J. P., & Wiese, E. (2022) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri53351.2022.9889356 · Cited by 40
The Minds of God(s) and Humans: Differences in Mind Perception in Fiji and North America
Willard, A. K., & McNamara, R. A. (2019) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12703 · Cited by 39
Abubshait, A., & Wykowska, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2020.565825 · Cited by 33
Socially evaluative contexts facilitate mentalizing
Woo, B. M., Tan, E., Yuen, F. L., & Hamlin, J. K. (2022) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2022.10.003 · Cited by 34
People's judgments of humans and robots in a classic moral dilemma
Malle, B. F., Scheutz, M. J., Cusimano, C., Voiklis, J., Komatsu, T., Thapa, S., & Aladia, S. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105958 · Cited by 32
Trafton, J. G., McCurry, J. M., Zish, K., & Frazier, C. R. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3640011 · Cited by 28
Cognition Beyond the Human: Cognitive Psychology and the New Animism
ojalehto, B., Seligman, R. A., & Medin, D. L. (2020) · Ethos · doi:10.1111/etho.12264 · Cited by 28
Anthis, J. R., Pauketat, J. V. T., Ladak, A., & Manoli, A. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713329 · Cited by 24
Advancing the RDoC initiative through the assessment of caregiver social processes
King, L. S., Salo, V. C., Kujawa, A., & Humphreys, K. L. (2021) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s095457942100064x · Cited by 27
Who Wants to Grant Robots Rights?
de Graaf, M. M. A., Hindriks, F., & Hindriks, K. V. (2022) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2021.781985 · Cited by 22
Service robots and artificial morality: an examination of robot behavior that violates human privacy
Söderlund, M. (2023) · Journal of Service Theory and Practice · doi:10.1108/jstp-09-2022-0196 · Cited by 29
Kohn, S. C., Momen, A., Wiese, E., Lee, Y., & Shaw, T. H. (2019) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181319631381 · Cited by 23
Evidence of the unidimensional structure of mind perception
Tzelios, K., Williams, L. A., Omerod, J., & Bliss‐Moreau, E. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-23047-6 · Cited by 21
Momen, A., Visser, E. D., Wolsten, K., Cooley, K., Walliser, J., & Tossell, C. C. (2023) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2023.063 · Cited by 22
Avatars in Pain: Visible Harm Enhances Mind Perception in Humans and Robots
Świderska, A., & Küster, D. (2018) · Perception · doi:10.1177/0301006618809919 · Cited by 24
Factors that influence robot acceptance
Xu, L., & Yu, F. (2019) · Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version) · doi:10.1360/tb-2019-0136 · Cited by 21
Mind perception and moral judgment in autism
Akechi, H., Kikuchi, Y., Tojo, Y., Hakarino, K., & Hasegawa, T. (2018) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.1970 · Cited by 19
Kopp, T. (2024) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-023-01082-1 · Cited by 26
Autism attenuates the perception of the mind-body divide
Berent, I., Theodore, R. M., & Valencia, E. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2211628119 · Cited by 21
Attributions of intent and moral responsibility to AI agents
Ayad, R., & Plaks, J. E. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100107 · Cited by 23
Children prefer to learn from smart devices, but do not trust them more than humans
Wojcik, E. H., Prasad, A., Hutchinson, S. P., & Shen, K. (2021) · International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100406 · Cited by 20
Socially intelligent machines that learn from humans and help humans learn
Gweon, H., Fan, J. E., & Kim, B. (2023) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2022.0048 · Cited by 24
Children's Responding to Humanlike Agents Reflects an Uncanny Valley
Strait, M. K., Urry, H. L., & Muentener, P. (2019) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri.2019.8673088 · Cited by 20
Algorithmic discrimination causes less desire for moral punishment than human discrimination
Xu, L., Yu, F., & Peng, K. (2022) · Acta Psychologica Sinica · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2022.01076 · Cited by 18
Constrained Choice: Children's and Adults’ Attribution of Choice to a Humanoid Robot
Flanagan, T., Rottman, J., & Howard, L. H. (2021) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13043 · Cited by 19
How People Infer a Humanlike Mind from a Robot BodyPreprint
Zhao, X., Phillips, E. J., & Malle, B. F. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/w6r24 · Cited by 18
Strohminger, N., & Jordan, M. R. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105068 · Cited by 15
Kelemen, D. A., Brown, S. A., & Pizza, L. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.101990 · Cited by 16
Innocence over utilitarianism: Heightened moral standards for robots in rescue dilemmas
Sundvall, J. R. I., Drosinou, M., Hannikainen, I. R., Elovaara, K., Halonen, J., Herzon, V., Kopecký, R., Košová, M. J., Koverola, M., Kunnari, A., et al. (2023) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2936 · Cited by 20
The illusion of the mind–body divide is attenuated in males
Berent, I. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-33079-1 · Cited by 15
Kasper, A., Frébert, N., & Testé, B. (2022) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000478 · Cited by 15
The Human AffectomePreprint
Schiller, D., Yu, A. N. C., Alia‐Klein, N., Becker, S., Cromwell, H. C., Dolcos, F., Eslinger, P. J., Frewen, P., Kemp, A. H., Pace-Schott, E. F., et al. (2022) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/9nu32 · Cited by 17
What will society think about AI consciousness? Lessons from the animal case
Caviola, L., Sebo, J., & Birch, J. (2025) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2025.06.002 · Cited by 15
Dimensions of wisdom perception across twelve countries on five continents
Rudnev, M., Barrett, H. C., Buckwalter, W., Machery, É., Stich, S., Barr, K., Bencherifa, A., Clancy, R. F., Crone, D. L., Deguchi, Y., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50294-0 · Cited by 13
The role of agency and communion in dehumanization — an integrative perspective
Formanowicz, M., Bulska, D., & Shnabel, N. (2022) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101236 · Cited by 12
Lay Concepts of Art, Craft, and Manufacture and the Implications for Sustainable Consumption
Judge, M., Fernando, J. W., Paladino, Á., Mikołajczak, G., & Kashima, Y. (2020) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12368 · Cited by 12
Dong, J., Yu, S., Choi, K., & Jeon, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2025.1529421 · Cited by 12
Chung, K., Park, J. Y., Park, K., & Kim, Y. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20175016 · Cited by 10
Towards Turing Test 2.0—Attribution of Moral Status and Personhood to Human and Non-Human Agents
Lukaszewicz, A., & Fortuna, P. (2022) · Postdigital Science and Education · doi:10.1007/s42438-022-00303-6 · Cited by 6
Beliefs about Origins and Eternal Life: How Easy Is Formal Religious Theory Development?
Kelemen, D., Emmons, N. A., Brown, S. A., & Gallik, C. (2021) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2021.1909031 · Cited by 7
Mind-reading machines: Distinct user responses to thought-detecting and emotion-detecting robots.
Grundke, A., Stein, J., & Appel, M. (2022) · Technology Mind and Behavior · doi:10.1037/tmb0000053 · Cited by 9
Elaborating humanness: a direct comparison between mindful and mindless entities
Ruzzante, D., & Vaes, J. (2022) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101235 · Cited by 9
Ladak, A., Wilks, M., Loughnan, S., & Anthis, J. R. (2025) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713130 · Cited by 19
Banks, J., Koban, K., & Haggadone, B. A. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3572036 · Cited by 10
Studying Mind Perception in Social Robotics Implicitly
Pekçetin, T. N., Barinal, B., Tunç, J., Acartürk, C., & Ürgen, B. A. (2023) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3568162.3577001 · Cited by 11
Clark, H. H., & Fischer, K. (2023) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x22002825 · Cited by 9
Gender Categories as Dual‐Character Concepts?
Guo, C., Dweck, C. S., & Markman, E. M. (2021) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12954 · Cited by 12
Self-citationNaive psychology depends on naive physicsPreprint
Liu, S., Outa, J., & Akbıyık, S. (2024) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/u6xdz · Cited by 9
Giger, J., Piçarra, N., Pochwatko, G., Almeida, N., Almeida, A. S., & Costa, N. (2024) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/2024/5569587 · Cited by 8
Are artificial agents perceived similarly to humans? Knowns, unknowns and the road ahead
Rubo, M., & Neumann, I. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1565170 · Cited by 10
What is (and was) a person? Evidence on historical mind perceptions from natural language
Ash, E., Stammbach, D., & Tobia, K. P. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105501 · Cited by 10
Young infants' expectations about a self-propelled agent's body
Choi, Y., Seok, J. H., & Luo, Y. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105629 · Cited by 8
When does “no” mean no? Insights from sex robots
Grigoreva, A. D., Rottman, J., & Tasimi, A. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105687 · Cited by 9
Animals are diverse: distinct forms of animalized dehumanization
Sevillano, V., & Fiske, S. T. (2023) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101265 · Cited by 8
Spelke, E. S. (2023) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x23002443 · Cited by 14
Investigating the Dimensions of Mind Perception
McMurtrie, B. L. (2023) · Journal of European Psychology Students · doi:10.59477/jeps.594 · Cited by 7
Lie, Repent, Repeat: Exploring Apologies after Repeated Robot Deception
Rogers, K., Webber, R. J. A., Chang, J., Zubizarreta, G. G., & Howard, A. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3610977.3634980 · Cited by 7
Kitchens, M. B., & Meier, B. P. (2025) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2025.2503006 · Cited by 9
The “Hard Problem of Consciousness” Arises from Human Psychology
Berent, I. (2023) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00094 · Cited by 8
Do Companies Think and Feel? Mind Perception of Organizations
Tang, S., & Gray, K. J. (2023) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13320 · Cited by 7
Malle, B. F., & Phillips, E. (2023) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/dzvn4 · Cited by 7
Lee, Y.-J., & Kim, S.-H. (2025) · Comput. Hum. Behav. Artif. Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100192 · Cited by 11
Common ground improves learning with conversational agents
Körner, A., Tolzin, A., Janson, A., Leimeister, J. M., & Rummer, R. (2025) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2025.2541222 · Cited by 7
Choosing the “Perfect” Scale: A Primer to Evaluate Existing Scales in HRI
Saad, L., Roesler, E., Phillips, E. K., & Trafton, J. G. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3772066 · Cited by 7
Real-World Implicit Association Task for Studying Mind Perception: Insights for Social Robotics
Pekçetin, T. N., Evsen, Ş., Pekçetin, S., Acarturk, C., & Urgen, B. (2024) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3610978.3640706 · Cited by 6
Consciousness, Phenomenal Consciousness, and Free Will
Sytsma, J. M., & Snater, M. (2023) · Bloomsbury Academic eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781350266353.0007 · Cited by 6
Experimental Philosophy of Consciousness
Reuter, K. (2024) · doi:10.1093/9780198918905.003.0017 · Cited by 6
Chen, A., Kim, S. S. Y., Dharmasiri, A., Russakovsky, O., & Fan, J. E. (2025) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3706599.3719710 · Cited by 9
Agentic and communal motivations underlying human–AI interactions
Dang, J., & Liu, L. (2025) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.70065 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Weisman, K., Dweck, C. S., & Markman, E. M.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2017-10-11
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 43
- Pages
- 11374-11379
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC5664492
- OpenAlex
- W2764192991
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 22.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Keywords
- human uniqueness, dehumanization, moral reasoning, decision-making capacity, human-animal differences
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Cognition, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Processes, Middle Aged, Morals, Social Perception, Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review