The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rethinking people’s conceptions of mental life
Open accessAbstract
Significance: How do ordinary people make sense of mental life? Pioneering work on the dimensions of mind perception has been widely interpreted as evidence that lay people perceive two fundamental components of mental life: experience and agency. However, using a method better suited to addressing this question, we discovered a very different conceptual structure. Our four studies consistently revealed three components of mental life—suites of capacities related to the body, the heart, and the mind—with each component encompassing related aspects of both experience and agency. This body–heart–mind framework distinguishes itself from the experience–agency framework by its clear and importantly different implications for dehumanization, moral reasoning, and other important social phenomena.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, the correspondence between these dimensions and phenomenality is not clear (Sytsma 2014) and more recent work has found evidence for alternative structures that cut across this distinction (e.g. Weisman et al. 2017, Malle 2019).”
From Folk psychological attributions of consciousness to large language models (2024) · cites this paper as Weisman et al. 2017
Citations
Cites
Dehumanization: An integrative review
Haslam, N. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4 · Cited by 2,919 · cited 1×
“If experience and agency are understood to be the two components of mental life, as has been widely assumed, it is logical to suppose that there may be two corresponding forms of dehumanization: the denial of experience, and the denial of agency (17).”
BackgroundGray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1134475 · Cited by 2,342 · cited 11×
“We followed the original analyses as described in the supplementary materials for the original study (1) as exactly as possible: We first computed mean relative ratings for each of the 13 characters, for each of the 18 mental capacities, and then conducted a PCA via singular-value decomposition on…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-6626 · Cited by 2,234
Bukimi no tani [the uncanny valley]
Mori, M. (1970) · Energy · Cited by 1,485
Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality
Gray, K., Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2012) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2012.651387 · Cited by 1,008
Cognitive Development: Foundational Theories Of Core Domains
Wellman, H. M., & Gelman, S. A. (1992) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.002005 · Cited by 986
Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley
Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.007 · Cited by 941 · cited 2×
“’s work suggests that people perceive robots to be very low on experience and middling on agency (1) and that increasing people’s perceptions of robots’ experience (but not agency) elicits feelings of uncanniness (3).”
BackgroundNot yet human: Implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences.
Goff, P. A., Eberhardt, J. L., Williams, M. J., & Jackson, M. C. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.292 · Cited by 880
Social cognitive development : frontiers and possible futures
Flavell, J. H., & Ross, L. D. (1981) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · Cited by 741
More than a body: Mind perception and the nature of objectification.
Gray, K. J., Knobe, J., Sheskin, M., Bloom, P., & Barrett, L. F. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025883 · Cited by 304
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- M Mori, The uncanny valley. Energy 7, 33–35 (1970).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A multidimensional conception and measure of human-robot trust
Malle, B. F., & Ullman, D. L. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819472-0.00001-0 · Cited by 282
Human or virtual: How influencer type shapes brand attitudes
Ozdemir, O., Kolfal, B., Messinger, P. R., & Rizvi, S. A. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107771 · Cited by 239
Nummenmaa, L., Hari, R., Hietanen, J. K., & Glerean, E. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1807390115 · Cited by 216
Holding Robots Responsible: The Elements of Machine Morality
Bigman, Y., Waytz, A. G., Alterovitz, R., & Gray, K. J. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.008 · Cited by 185
Algorithmic discrimination causes less moral outrage than human discrimination
Bigman, Y. E., Wilson, D., Arnestad, M. N., Waytz, A., & Gray, K. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0001250 · Cited by 198
Metadata
- Authors
- Weisman, K., Dweck, C. S., & Markman, E. M.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2017-10-11
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 43
- Pages
- 11374-11379
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC5664492
- OpenAlex
- W2764192991
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 22.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Keywords
- human uniqueness, dehumanization, moral reasoning, decision-making capacity, human-animal differences
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Cognition, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Processes, Middle Aged, Morals, Social Perception, Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review