The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exposure to rising inequality shapes Americans' opportunity beliefs and policy support
Open accessAbstract
Significance: Although rising economic inequality in the United States has alarmed many, research across the social sciences repeatedly concludes that Americans are largely unconcerned about it. We argue that this conclusion may be premature. Here, we present the results of three experiments that test a different perspective—the opportunity model of beliefs about inequality. Tempering the conclusions of past work, the findings suggest that perceptions of rising economic inequality spark skepticism about the existence of economic opportunity in society that, in turn, may motivate support for equity-enhancing policies. Hence, this work calls for new theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of rising economic inequality, especially those that bridge disciplinary boundaries, as well as the largely separate experimental and correlational literatures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In another experiment, participants were more likely to express that it is the government's responsibility to reduce inequality when they had been informed about the income distribution and the rising levels of inequality in the US (McCall et al., 2017).”
From Factual belief polarization between Democrats and Republicans: source or epiphenomenon of ideological and affective polarization? (2024) · cites this paper as McCall et al., 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“exposing American participants to information about the rising economic inequality, compared to control information, led to stronger perceptions that economic success is due to structural factors rather than individual effort.”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as McCall, Burk, Laperrière, and Richeson (2017)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In the largest of the three studies, involving a representative sample of American adults, it was also found that information about rising inequality led to greater endorsement of policies that could be implemented by government and by business to reduce inequality.”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as McCall, Burk, Laperrière, and Richeson (2017)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2013) · Cited by 44,563
Unequal democracy: the political economy of the new gilded age
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-1746 · Cited by 2,314
Income Inequality, Equality of Opportunity, and Intergenerational Mobility
Corak, M. (2013) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.27.3.79 · Cited by 1,898
Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe
Alesina, A., & Glaeser, E. L. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0199267669.001.0001 · Cited by 1,500
Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution
Fong, C. M. (2001) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/s0047-2727(00)00141-9 · Cited by 1,120
Building a Better America—One Wealth Quintile at a Time
Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610393524 · Cited by 1,119
How Elastic Are Preferences for Redistribution? Evidence from Randomized Survey Experiments
Kuziemko, I., Norton, M. I., Saez, E., & Stantcheva, S. (2015) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20130360 · Cited by 1,109
Belief in a Just World and Redistributive Politics
Bénabou, R., & Jean Tirole, Z. (2006) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.699 · Cited by 1,065
Antecedents and Consequences of System-Justifying Ideologies
Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x · Cited by 1,063
American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword.
Manza, J., & Lipset, S. M. (1996) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2077274 · Cited by 1,009
Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe. A World of Difference
van Doorn, L., Alesina, A., & Glaeser, E. L. (2005) · Population · doi:10.2307/4150792 · Cited by 1,003
Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1251936 · Cited by 960
Beliefs About Inequality: American's Views of What Is and What Ought To Be
Alwin, D. F., Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1987) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2071506 · Cited by 960
Facing Up to the American Dream: Race, Class, and the Soul of the Nation.
Young, A. A., & Hochschild, J. L. (1996) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2077080 · Cited by 684
The demographic and political composition of Mechanical Turk samples
Levay, K. E., Freese, J., & Druckman, J. N. (2016) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244016636433 · Cited by 676
On the Precipice of a “Majority-Minority” America
Craig, M. A., & Richeson, J. A. (2014) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614527113 · Cited by 611
Self-citationWhat's Fair?: American Beliefs about Distributive Justice.
Hamilton, V. L., & Hochschild, J. L. (1983) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2066819 · Cited by 530
Beliefs about Inequality: Americans' Views of What Is and What Ought to Be
Ohsfeldt, R. L., Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1987) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1059348 · Cited by 472
Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies
Brooks, C., & Manza, J. (2007) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226075952.001.0001 · Cited by 427
Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality
McCoy, S. K., & Major, B. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.009 · Cited by 414
What's Fair? American Beliefs about Distributive Justice
Cohen, R. L., & Hochschild, J. L. (1984) · Political Psychology · doi:10.2307/3791196 · Cited by 401
American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword
Nelles, H. V. (1997) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.1086/ahr/102.3.749 · Cited by 319
Americans overestimate social class mobility
Kraus, M. W., & Tan, J. J. X. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.01.005 · Cited by 297
African American, Hispanic, and White Beliefs about Black/White Inequality, 1977-2004
Hunt, M. O. (2007) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240707200304 · Cited by 287
Subjective Status Shapes Political Preferences
Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., Lundberg, K. B., Kay, A. C., & Payne, B. K. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614553947 · Cited by 234 · cited 1×
“…research on the topic (in economics, political science, sociology, and psychology) has largely concluded that Americans are uninformed of the strikingly high levels of income inequality in the country and, even when informed, are at best ambivalent supporters of policies to reduce it (3 – 7).”
BackgroundMovin’ on Up? How Perceptions of Social Mobility Affect Our Willingness to Defend the System
Day, M. V., & Fiske, S. T. (2016) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550616678454 · Cited by 231
Facing up to the American dream: race, class, and the soul of the nation
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-4228 · Cited by 224
Income Mobility Breeds Tolerance for Income Inequality: Cross-National and Experimental Evidence
Shariff, A. F., Wiwad, D., & Aknin, L. B. (2016) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616635596 · Cited by 202
Americans' Social Policy Preferences in the Era of Rising Inequality
McCall, L., & Kenworthy, L. (2009) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592709990818 · Cited by 197
Self-citationSvallfors, S. (2006) · Stanford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781503625624 · Cited by 196
Exposure to inequality affects support for redistribution
Sands, M. L. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1615010113 · Cited by 178
The moral economy of class: class and attitudes in comparative perspective
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-5350 · Cited by 154
The undeserving rich: American beliefs about inequality, opportunity, and redistribution
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-4724 · Cited by 143
Lowery, B. S., Chow, R. M., Knowles, E. D., & Unzueta, M. M. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0024598 · Cited by 105
Would Equal Opportunity Mean More Mobility?Preprint
Jencks, C., & Tach, L. (2005) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.779507 · Cited by 100
A Choice Mind-Set Increases the Acceptance and Maintenance of Wealth Inequality
Savani, K., & Rattan, A. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611434540 · Cited by 93
Johnson, I. R., & Fujita, K. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611423670 · Cited by 71
The Double Bind: The Politics of Racial and Class Inequalities in the Americas
Hooker, J., & Tillery, A. B. (2016) · Cited by 70
Franko, W. W. (2016) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/686025 · Cited by 51
Americans Still Overestimate Social Class Mobility: A Pre-Registered Self-Replication
Kraus, M. W. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01709 · Cited by 50
First-Year Teachers’ Uphill Struggle to Implement Inquiry Instruction
Chichekian, T., Shore, B. M., & Tabatabai, D. (2016) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244016649011 · Cited by 50
Economic inequality and belief in meritocracy in the United States
Solt, F., Hu, Y., Hudson, K., Song, J., & Yu, D. (2016) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/2053168016672101 · Cited by 47
The Political Implications of American Concerns About Economic Inequality
Wright, G. W. (2017) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-017-9399-3 · Cited by 34
Chapter Two. Would Equal Opportunity Mean More Mobility?
Jencks, C., & Tach, L. (2006) · Stanford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781503625495-004 · Cited by 33
Political and Policy Responses to Problems of Inequality and Opportunity: Past, Present, and Future
McCall, L. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25991-8_12 · Cited by 26
Self-citationEconomic Inequality and Belief in Meritocracy in the United StatesPreprint
Solt, F., Hu, Y., Hudson, K., et al. (2016) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/x9qsf · Cited by 5
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- ; Congressional Budget Office Trend in the Distribution of Household Income Between 1979 and 2007 (The Congress of the United States, Washington, DC, 2011).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour
Manstead, A. S. R. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12251 · Cited by 831
Jost, J. T. (2019) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12297 · Cited by 567
The Misperception of Racial Economic Inequality
Kraus, M. W., Onyeador, I. N., Daumeyer, N. M., Rucker, J. M., & Richeson, J. A. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619863049 · Cited by 266
“…reminders about how the current economic system is unjust in ways that unfairly disadvantage racial minorities because they violate beliefs that the opportunity structure in society is fair are likely to increase support for redistributive policies (Day & Fiske, 2017; McCall et al., 2017).”
BackgroundSelf-citationFrom ‘having’ to ‘being’: self‐worth and the current crisis of American society
Lamont, M. (2019) · British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12667 · Cited by 227
Davidai, S. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.07.012 · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- McCall, L., Burk, D., Laperrière, M., & Richeson, J. A.
- Affiliations
- The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2017-08-22
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 9593-9598
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC5594671
- OpenAlex
- W2747618620
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 9
- FWCI
- 35.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Russell Sage Foundation (83-13-05)
- National Science Foundation (TESS)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Keywords
- economic inequality, structural inequality, individual effort, policy support, inequality reduction, public skepticism, information exposure, social mobility, United States
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Humans, Income, Politics, Public Policy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Models, Economic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
