Cited by 152Treatment of Major DepressionTryptophan and brain disordersStress Responses and Cortisol

Acetyl- l -carnitine deficiency in patients with major depressive disorder

Open access
Nasca, Carla, Bigio, Benedetta, Lee, Francis S., Young, Sarah P., Kautz, Marin M., Albright, Ashly, Beasley, James, Millington, David S. +5 more·2018·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The lack of biomarkers to identify target populations greatly limits the promise of precision medicine for major depressive disorder (MDD), a primary cause of ill health and disability. The endogenously produced molecule acetyl-l-carnitine (LAC) is critical for hippocampal function and several behavioral domains. In rodents with depressive-like traits, LAC levels are markedly decreased and signal abnormal hippocampal glutamatergic function and dendritic plasticity. LAC supplementation induces rapid and lasting antidepressant-like effects via epigenetic mechanisms of histone acetylation. This mechanistic model led us to evaluate LAC levels in humans. We found that LAC levels, and not those of free carnitine, were decreased in patients with MDD compared with age- and sex-matched healthy controls in two independent study centers. Secondary exploratory analyses showed that the degree of LAC deficiency reflected both the severity and age of onset of MDD. Moreover, these analyses showed that the decrease in LAC was larger in patients with a history of treatment-resistant depression (TRD), among whom childhood trauma and, specifically, a history of emotional neglect and being female, predicted the decreased LAC. These findings suggest that LAC may serve as a candidate biomarker to help diagnose a clinical endophenotype of MDD characterized by decreased LAC, greater severity, and earlier onset as well as a history of childhood trauma in patients with TRD. Together with studies in rodents, these translational findings support further exploration of LAC as a therapeutic target that may help to define individualized treatments in biologically based depression subtype consistent with the spirit of precision medicine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1801609115

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maladaptive epigenetic changes can be reversed or normalized by psychological interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and mindfulness.

    “maladaptive epigenetic changes can be reversed or normalized by psychological interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and mindfulness”

    From The clinical use of epigenetics in psychiatry: a narrative review of epigenetic mechanisms, key candidate genes, and precision psychiatry (2025) · cites this paper as [57]

    The Abstract discusses epigenetic effects of acetyl-L-carnitine supplementation in rodent models, not psychological interventions. Searches for CBT, mindfulness, and reversal or normalization of epigenetic changes found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nasca, C., Bigio, B., Lee, F. S., Young, S. P., Kautz, M. M., Albright, A., Beasley, J., Millington, D. S., Mathé, A. A., Kocsis, J. H., Murrough, J. W., McEwen, B. S., & Rasgon, N.
Affiliations
  • Rockefeller University (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Duke University Health System (US)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2018-07-30
Volume
115
Issue
34
Pages
8627-8632
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2886666079
Cited by
152
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7
FWCI
11.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Robertson Foundation (NA)
  • Hope for Depression Research Foundation (NA)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
acetyl-L-carnitine, major depressive disorder, treatment-resistant depression, biomarkers, hippocampal function, histone acetylation, childhood trauma, emotional neglect, depression severity, age of onset, precision medicine, antidepressant-like effects
MeSH terms
Acetylcarnitine, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Carnitine, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review