Cited by 101Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesSexual Differentiation and DisordersGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Integrated functional genomic analyses of Klinefelter and Turner syndromes reveal global network effects of altered X chromosome dosage

Open access
Zhang, Xianglong, Hong, David, Ma, Shining, Ward, Thomas, Ho, Marcus, Pattni, Reenal, Duren, Zhana, Stankov, Atanas +5 more·2020·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

In both Turner syndrome (TS) and Klinefelter syndrome (KS) copy number aberrations of the X chromosome lead to various developmental symptoms. We report a comparative analysis of TS vs. KS regarding differences at the genomic network level measured in primary samples by analyzing gene expression, DNA methylation, and chromatin conformation. X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) silences transcription from one X chromosome in female mammals, on which most genes are inactive, and some genes escape from XCI. In TS, almost all differentially expressed escape genes are down-regulated but most differentially expressed inactive genes are up-regulated. In KS, differentially expressed escape genes are up-regulated while the majority of inactive genes appear unchanged. Interestingly, 94 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) overlapped between TS and female and KS and male comparisons; and these almost uniformly display expression changes into opposite directions. DEGs on the X chromosome and the autosomes are coexpressed in both syndromes, indicating that there are molecular ripple effects of the changes in X chromosome dosage. Six potential candidate genes ( RPS4X , SEPT6 , NKRF , CX0rf57 , NAA10 , and FLNA ) for KS are identified on Xq, as well as candidate central genes on Xp for TS. Only promoters of inactive genes are differentially methylated in both syndromes while escape gene promoters remain unchanged. The intrachromosomal contact map of the X chromosome in TS exhibits the structure of an active X chromosome. The discovery of shared DEGs indicates the existence of common molecular mechanisms for gene regulation in TS and KS that transmit the gene dosage changes to the transcriptome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1910003117

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is evidence of a unique and tissue-specific genome-wide methylation and transcription landscape in TS extending to both the X chromosome and the autosomes.

    “There is evidence of a unique and tissue-specific genome-wide methylation and transcription landscape in TS extending to both the X chromosome and the autosomes.103-109”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, X., Hong, D., Ma, S., Ward, T., Ho, M., Pattni, R., Duren, Z., Stankov, A., Bade Shrestha, S., Hallmayer, J., Wong, W. H., Reiss, A. L., & Urban, A. E.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305;
Corresponding author
  • Hong, David
  • Wong, Wing Hung
  • Reiss, Allan L.
  • Urban, Alexander E.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2020-02-18
Volume
117
Issue
9
Pages
4864-4873
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W3007250801
Cited by
101
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6
FWCI
9.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
HHS | NIH | National Human Genome Research Institute (HG007735)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
Klinefelter syndrome, Turner syndrome, X chromosome dosage, X chromosome inactivation, copy number alterations, gene expression, DNA methylation, chromatin conformation, co-expression network, candidate genes, RPS4X, SEPT6, NAA10, filamin A
MeSH terms
Animals, Chromatin, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Klinefelter Syndrome, Male, Mammals, Repressor Proteins, Turner Syndrome, X Chromosome, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Gene Dosage, DNA Methylation, Genomics, Chromosomes, Human, X, Receptor, PAR-2, X Chromosome Inactivation, Septins, Transcriptome, Karyotype, N-Terminal Acetyltransferase A, N-Terminal Acetyltransferase E, Filamins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review