Cited by 57Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesBehavioral Health and InterventionsPsychological Testing and Assessment

Questionnaires and task-based measures assess different aspects of self-regulation: Both are needed

Open access
Friedman, Naomi P., Banich, Marie T.·2019·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans the biological, physical, and social sciences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1915315116

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Task-based and self-report measures of cognitive control may best be considered separable constructs that are both relevant to mental health.

    “However, some evidence suggests that task-based and self-report measures of CC may best be considered separable constructs that are both relevant to mental health [209, 213], because they independently predict psychopathology in multiple regressions [157, 214, 215].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Friedman, N. P., & Banich, M. T.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2019-11-12
Volume
116
Issue
49
Pages
24396-24397
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2983814663
Cited by
57
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
HHS | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH063207, R01MH105501)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
self-regulation, questionnaire measures, self-regulation assessment, measurement validity
MeSH terms
Self-Control, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Task Performance and Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review