Cited by 49Personal Information Management and User BehaviorDigital Media and PhilosophyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

“Cognitive control in media multitaskers” ten years on: A meta-analysis

Open access
Parry, Douglas A., Le Roux, Daniel B.·2021·Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace

Abstract

In the decade since Ophir, Nass, and Wagner’s (2009) seminal study numerous researchers have investigated possible associations between media multitasking and cognitive control. Extending recent reviews, the present study provides a synthesis of extant research into this association across measurement approachs and cognitive functions. Following a systematic search and selection process, 118 assessments were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, the pooled effect size of the association, across measurement approaches and cognitive control functions, is small. This association is moderated both by the measurement approach as well as by the outcome variables targeted. These differences are tested and explained in detail. Building on the findings, it is recommended that research be conducted to determine the sources of heterogeneity in outcomes, understand differences between measurement approaches, and address causality and theoretical mechanisms. Overall, the review suggests that, ten years on, we are no closer to understanding ‘cognitive control in media multitaskers.’

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5817/cp2021-2-7

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Repeated exposure to short, emotionally salient, and algorithmically sequenced music-based clips may gradually train students into patterns of attention fragmentation.

    “Repeated exposure to short, emotionally salient, and algorithmically sequenced music-based clips may gradually train students into patterns of attention fragmentation”

    From Algorithmic short-video music consumption and academic related functions: a three-wave longitudinal study of university students (2026) · cites this paper as Parry and le Roux, 2021

    The Rationale for Associations Between Media Multitasking and Cognitive Control (page not provided) discusses the hypothesis that repeated media multitasking can habituate people to broader distributions of attention. It does not address short, emotionally salient, algorithmically sequenced music clips or students specifically. The Address Causality and Theoretical Mechanisms section (page not provided) says the evidence cannot establish whether media multitasking causes changes in cognitive control. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Burgess, P.W. (2004). Theory and methodology in executive function research. In P. Rabbitt (Ed.), Methodology of frontal and executive function (pp. 81-116). Psychology Press.
  3. Ernst, T. (2014). Beeinflusst Multitasking das eigene Gluck?: Die Auswirkung von Medien-Multitasking auf das subjektive Wohlbefinden von Studierenden [Does multitasking affect happiness?: The effect of media multitasking on the subjective well-being of students] [Unpublished bachelor's thesis]. Zurich University for Applied Sciences.
  4. Gilbert, S. J., & Burgess, P. W. (2008). Primer: Executive function. Current Biology, 18(3), R110-R114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.12.014 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Irwin, M. L. (2017). The dynamics of media use, attention, and behavioral control [Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University]. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1492700316011036
  6. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Prentice Hall.
  7. Liebenberg & S. Gruner (Eds.), ICT Education (pp. 19-36). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69670-6_2 · DOI
  8. van Koningsbruggen, G. M., Hartmann, T., & Du, J. D. (2018). Always on? Explicating impulsive influences on media use. In P. Vorderer, D. Hefner, L. Reinecke, & C. Klimmt (Eds.), Permanently online, permanently connected (pp. 51-60). Routledge.
  9. Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii-xxiii. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4132319
  10. Wiradhany, W., & Koerts, J. (2021). Everyday functioning-related cognitive correlates of media multitasking: A mini meta-analysis. Media Psychology, 24(2), 276-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1685393 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parry, D. A., & Le Roux, D. B.
Affiliations
Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Venue
Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace
Published
2021-04-26
Volume
15
Issue
2
ISSN
1802-7962 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3157962720
Cited by
49
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
media multitasking, cognitive control, executive function, measurement methods, outcome heterogeneity, causal mechanisms, digital media use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review