Cited by 240Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementHealthcare Systems and Public HealthHealth disparities and outcomes

US life expectancy stalls due to cardiovascular disease, not drug deaths

Open access
Mehta, Neil K., Abrams, Leah R., Myrskylä, Mikko·2020·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

After decades of robust growth, the rise in US life expectancy stalled after 2010. Explanations for the stall have focused on rising drug-related deaths. Here we show that a stagnating decline in cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality was the main culprit, outpacing and overshadowing the effects of all other causes of death. The CVD stagnation held back the increase of US life expectancy at age 25 y by 1.14 y in women and men, between 2010 and 2017. Rising drug-related deaths had a much smaller effect: 0.1 y in women and 0.4 y in men. Comparisons with other high-income countries reveal that the US CVD stagnation is unusually strong, contributing to a stark mortality divergence between the US and peer nations. Without the aid of CVD mortality declines, future US life expectancy gains must come from other causes—a monumental task given the enormity of earlier declines in CVD death rates. Reversal of the drug overdose epidemic will be beneficial, but insufficient for achieving pre-2010 pace of life expectancy growth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1920391117

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mehta, N. K., Abrams, L. R., & Myrskylä, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Myrskylä, Mikko
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2020-03-16
Volume
117
Issue
13
Pages
6998-7000
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W3010657346
Cited by
240
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 1
FWCI
54.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
Funders
HHS | NIH | National Institute on Aging (R03AG060404, 2T32AG027708-06A1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
life expectancy, cardiovascular mortality, drug overdose deaths, causes of death, sex differences in mortality, high-income countries, United States mortality trends
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Cause of Death, Female, Humans, Life Expectancy, Male, United States, Drug Overdose

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review