Cited by 87Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

The murine β-globin locus control region regulates the rate of transcription but not the hyperacetylation of histones at the active genes

Open access
Schübeler, Dirk, Groudine, Mark, Bender, M. A.·2001·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Locus control regions (LCRs) are defined by their ability to confer high-level tissue-specific expression to linked genes in transgenic assays. Previously, we reported that, at its native site, the murine β-globin LCR is required for high-level β-globin gene expression, but is not required to initiate an open chromatin conformation of the locus. To further investigate the mechanism of LCR-mediated transcriptional enhancement, we have analyzed allele-specific β-globin expression and the pattern of histone acetylation in the presence and absence of the LCR. In single cells from mice heterozygous for a deletion of the LCR, β-globin expression from the LCR-deleted allele is consistently low (≈1–4% of wild type). Thus, the endogenous LCR enhances globin gene expression by increasing the rate of transcription from each linked allele rather than by increasing the probability of establishing transcription per se . Furthermore, in erythroid cells from mice homozygous for the highly expressing wild-type β-globin locus, hyperacetylation of histones H3 and H4 is localized to the LCR and active genes. In mice homozygous for the LCR deletion reduced histone hyperacetylation is observed in LCR proximal sequences; however, deletion of the LCR has no effect on the localized hyperacetylation of the genes. Together, our results suggest that, in its native genomic context, the LCR follows the rate model of enhancer function, and that the developmentally specific hyperacetylation of the globin genes is independent of both the rate of transcription and the presence of the LCR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.201394698

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. [1]Bulger M, Groudine M. Genes Dev. 1999;13:2465–2477. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.19.2465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  2. [2]Engel J D, Tanimoto K. Cell. 2000;100:499–502. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80686-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  3. [3]Higgs D R. Cell. 1998;95:299–302. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81761-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  4. [5]Reik A, Telling A, Zitnik G, Cimbora D, Epner E, Groudine M. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:5992–6000. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.10.5992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  5. [7]Fiering S, Whitelaw E, Martin D I. BioEssays. 2000;22:381–387. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(200004)22:4<381::AID-BIES8>3.0.CO;2-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  6. [8]Francastel C, Walters M C, Groudine M, Martin D I. Cell. 1999;99:259–269. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81657-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  7. [9]Molete J M, Petrykowska H, Bouhassira E E, Feng Y Q, Miller W, Hardison R C. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:2969–2980. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.9.2969-2980.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  8. [10]Chen H, Lin R J, Xie W, Wilpitz D, Evans R M. Cell. 1999;98:675–686. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80054-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  9. [11]Parekh B S, Maniatis T. Mol Cell. 1999;3:125–129. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80181-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  10. [12]Schubeler D, Francastel C, Cimbora D M, Reik A, Martin D I, Groudine M. Genes Dev. 2000;14:940–950. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. [13]Cosma M P, Tanaka T, Nasmyth K. Cell. 1999;97:299–311. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80740-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  12. [14]Agalioti T, Lomvardas S, Parekh B, Yie J, Maniatis T, Thanos D. Cell. 2000;103:667–678. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00169-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  13. [15]Krebs J E, Kuo M H, Allis C D, Peterson C L. Genes Dev. 1999;13:1412–1421. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.11.1412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  14. [16]Shang Y, Hu X, DiRenzo J, Lazar M A, Brown M. Cell. 2000;103:843–852. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00188-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  15. [17]Elefant F, Su Y, Liebhaber S A, Cooke N E. EMBO J. 2000;19:6814–6822. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.24.6814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  16. [18]Litt M D, Simpson M, Recillas-Targa F, Prioleau M, Felsenfeld G. EMBO J. 2001;20:2224–2235. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.9.2224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  17. [19]McMurry M T, Krangel M S. Science. 2000;287:495–498. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. [20]Forsberg E C, Downs K M, Christensen H M, Im H, Nuzzi P A, Bresnick E H. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:14494–14499. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.26.14494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  19. [21]Bender M A, Reik A, Close J, Telling A, Epner E, Fiering S, Hardison R, Groudine M. Blood. 1998;92:4394–4403. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. [22]Fiering S, Epner E, Robinson K, Zhuang Y, Telling A, Hu M, Martin D I, Enver T, Ley T J, Groudine M. Genes Dev. 1995;9:2203–2213. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.18.2203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  21. [23]Reitman M, Lee E, Westphal H, Felsenfeld G. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:3990–3998. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.7.3990-3998.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  22. [25]Strahl B D, Allis C D. Nature (London) 2000;403:41–45. doi: 10.1038/47412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  23. [26]Gaensler K M, Kitamura M, Kan Y W. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:11381–11385. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.23.11381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  24. [27]Felsenfeld G. Cell. 1996;86:13–19. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80073-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  25. [28]Hebbes T R, Clayton A L, Thorne A W, Crane-Robinson C. EMBO J. 1994;13:1823–1830. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06451.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  26. [29]Weatherall D J. In: The Molecular Basis of Blood Diseases. Stamatoyannopoulos G, Nienhus A W, Majerus P W, Varmus H, editors. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1994. pp. 157–206. [Google Scholar]
  27. [30]Xu Y, Davidson L, Alt F W, Baltimore D. Immunity. 1996;4:377–385. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80251-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  28. [31]Ronai D, Berru M, Shulman M J. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:7031–7040. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.10.7031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  29. [32]Walters M C, Magis W, Fiering S, Eidemiller J, Scalzo D, Groudine M, Martin D I. Genes Dev. 1996;10:185–195. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.2.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  30. [33]Madisen L, Groudine M. Genes Dev. 1994;8:2212–2226. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.18.2212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  31. [34]Madisen L, Krumm A, Hebbes T R, Groudine M. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:6281–6292. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.11.6281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schübeler, D., Groudine, M., & Bender, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2001-09-11
Volume
98
Issue
20
Pages
11432-11437
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2083892058
Cited by
87
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL65440, R01HL065440)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R37DK044746, DK 44746)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
locus control region, beta-globin gene, histone hyperacetylation, histone H3, histone H4, transcription rate, allele-specific expression, erythroid cells, open chromatin, tissue-specific gene expression
MeSH terms
Acetylation, Alleles, Animals, Gene Expression Regulation, Globins, Histones, Probability, Transcription, Genetic, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Locus Control Region, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review