Cited by 58Pancreatic function and diabetesTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineDiabetes Management and Research

A therapeutic convection–enhanced macroencapsulation device for enhancing β cell viability and insulin secretion

Open access
Yang, Kisuk, O’Cearbhaill, Eoin D., Liu, Sophie S., Zhou, Angela, Chitnis, Girish D., Hamilos, Allison E., Xu, Jun, Verma, Mohan K. S. +9 more·2021·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is characterized by the autoimmune destruction of pancreatic β cells and it burdens millions worldwide. T1D patients typically require the life-long administration of insulin or immunosuppressive agents following transplantation. A macroencapsulation device (MED) acts as a bioartificial pancreas and can immunoprotect encapsulated β cells. However, conventional MEDs suffer from limited, cell-loading capacity and slow, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) because of the sole reliance on diffusion. Here, we developed a convection-enhanced MED (ceMED) to afford 3D capsule geometry for maximized cell loading and faster GSIS driven by convection. Overall, we demonstrated that the ceMED significantly improves nutrient exchange that enhances cell viability and GSIS, ultimately leading to a rapid reduction of hyperglycemia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2101258118

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A PTFE macroencapsulation device that actively pumped fluid through a hollow fiber running through its center demonstrated enhanced nutrient exchange that promoted cell survival and allowed for a greater cell density to be successfully loaded into the device.

    “For example, a PTFE macroencapsulation device that actively pumped fluid through a hollow fiber running through its center demonstrated enhanced nutrient exchange that promoted cell survival and allowed for a greater cell density to be successfully loaded into the device.”
  • Insulin secretion and blood glucose control were enhanced when the active fluid flow device was transplanted into diabetic rats.

    “Insulin secretion and blood glucose control was also enhanced when transplanted into diabetic rats.”
  • A decreased fibrotic response was observed with the active fluid flow setup.

    “Interestingly, they also observed a decreased fibrotic response with their active fluid flow setup.”
  • Relying on active fluid flow rather than passive diffusion for nutrient transport can greatly enhance the viability and performance of islets within a macroencapsulation device.

    “this study highlights that relying on active fluid flow rather than passive diffusion for nutrient transport can greatly enhance the viability and performance of islets within a macroencapsulation device.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]A. M. J. Shapiro., Islet transplantation in seven patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus using a glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regimen. N. Engl. J. Med. 343, 230– 238 (2000). 10911004

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, K., O’Cearbhaill, E. D., Liu, S. S., Zhou, A., Chitnis, G. D., Hamilos, A. E., Xu, J., Verma, M. K. S., Giraldo, J. A., Kudo, Y., Lee, E. A., Lee, Y., Pop, R., Langer, R., Melton, D. A., Greiner, D. L., & Karp, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Breakthrough T1D (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Harvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139;
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Karp, Jeffrey M.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2021-09-09
Volume
118
Issue
37
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W3197355082
Cited by
58
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 2
FWCI
9.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • HHS | National Institutes of Health (HL095722, U01DK104218)
  • Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (3-SRA-2013-282)
  • Incheon National University (Research Grant in 2021)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
islet transplantation, type 1 diabetes, beta-cell viability, insulin secretion, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, immunoprotection, hyperglycemia, glucose tolerance, fibrosis
MeSH terms
Insulin Secretion, Cell Encapsulation, Animals, Cell Survival, Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Insulin, Islets of Langerhans, Male, Islets of Langerhans Transplantation, Drug Delivery Systems, Convection, Insulin-Secreting Cells, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review