The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The function of bursts of spikes during visual fixation in the awake primate lateral geniculate nucleus and primary visual cortex
Open accessAbstract
When images are stabilized on the retina, visual perception fades. During voluntary visual fixation, however, constantly occurring small eye movements, including microsaccades, prevent this fading. We previously showed that microsaccades generated bursty firing in the primary visual cortex (area V-1) in the presence of stationary stimuli. Here we examine the neural activity generated by microsaccades in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), and in the area V-1 of the awake monkey, for various functionally relevant stimulus parameters. During visual fixation, microsaccades drove LGN neurons by moving their receptive fields across a stationary stimulus, offering a likely explanation of how microsaccades block fading during normal fixation. Bursts of spikes in the LGN and area V-1 were associated more closely than lone spikes with preceding microsaccades, suggesting that bursts are more reliable than are lone spikes as neural signals for visibility. In area V-1, microsaccade-generated activity, and the number of spikes per burst, was maximal when the bar stimulus centered over a receptive field matched the cell's optimal orientation. This suggested burst size as a neural code for stimuli optimality (and not solely stimuli visibility). As expected, burst size did not vary with stimulus orientation in the LGN. To address the effectiveness of microsaccades in generating neural activity, we compared activity correlated with microsaccades to activity correlated with flashing bars. Onset responses to flashes were about 7 times larger than the responses to the same stimulus moved across the cells' receptive fields by microsaccades, perhaps because of the relative abruptness of flashes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yarbus, A. L. (1967) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-5379-7 · Cited by 3,304
Changes in visual perception at the time of saccades
Ross, J., Morrone, M. C., Goldberg, M. E., & Burr, D. C. (2001) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01685-4 · Cited by 631
Retinal ganglion cell synchronization by fixational eye movements improves feature estimation
Greschner, M., Bongard, M., Rujan, P., & Ammermüller, J. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn821 · Cited by 118
Cited by
The role of fixational eye movements in visual perception
Martinez-Conde, S., Macknik, S. L., & Hubel, D. H. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1348 · Cited by 1,255
Self-citationThe Neural Correlates of Consciousness: An Update
Tononi, G., & Koch, C. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1440.004 · Cited by 627
Microsaccades: Small steps on a long way
Rolfs, M. (2009) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.08.010 · Cited by 521
The impact of microsaccades on vision: towards a unified theory of saccadic function
Martinez-Conde, S., Otero-Millan, J., & Macknik, S. L. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3405 · Cited by 461
Self-citationKagan, I., Gur, M., & Snodderly, D. M. (2008) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/8.14.19 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Martinez-Conde, S., Macknik, S. L., & Hubel, D. H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2002-10-02
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 13920-13925
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2101096835
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The function of bursts of spikes during visual fixation in the awake primate lateral geniculate nucleus and primary visual cortex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.212500599
- The paper
- Martinez-Conde, S., Macknik, S. L., & Hubel, D. H. (2002). The function of bursts of spikes during visual fixation in the awake primate lateral geniculate nucleus and primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.212500599
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.