Cited by 102Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesCarbon Nanotubes in CompositesCatalysts for Methane Reforming

Pyrolysis–catalysis upcycling of waste plastic using a multilayer stainless-steel catalyst toward a circular economy

Open access
Liu, Qingyu, Jiang, Dongyang, Zhou, Hui, Yuan, Xiangzhou, Wu, Chunfei, Hu, Changsong, Luque, Rafael, Wang, Shurong +3 more·2023·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Current un-sustainable plastic management is exacerbating plastic pollution, an urgent shift is thus needed to create a recycling society. Such recovering carbon (C) and hydrogen (H) from waste plastic has been considered as one practical route to achieve a circular economy. Here, we performed a simple pyrolysis-catalysis deconstruction of waste plastic via a monolithic multilayer stainless-steel mesh catalyst to produce multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and H 2 , which are important carbon material and energy carrier to achieve sustainable development. Results revealed that the C and H recovery efficiencies were as high as 86% and 70%, respectively. The unique oxidation-reduction process and improvement of surface roughness led to efficient exposure of active sites, which increased MWCNTs by suppressing macromolecule hydrocarbons. The C recovery efficiency declined by only 5% after 10 cycles, proving the long-term employment of the catalyst. This catalyst can efficiently convert aromatics to MWCNTs by the vapor–solid–solid mechanism and demonstrate good universality in processing different kinds of waste plastics. The produced MWCNTs showed potential in applications of lithium-ion batteries and telecommunication. Owing to the economic profits and environmental benefits of the developed route, we highlighted its potential as a promising alternative to conventional incineration, simultaneously achieving the waste-to-resource strategy and circular economy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2305078120

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Liu et al. used acid-washed stainless-steel mesh to catalyze waste plastic pyrolysis, achieving 86% carbon recovery and 70% hydrogen recovery, confirming that the catalyst efficiently converted aromatics into MWCNTs via a vapor-solid mechanism.

    “Liu et al. [48] employed acid-washed stainless-steel mesh-where removal of the surface chromium oxide layer exposed Fe/Ni active sites-to catalyze waste plastic pyrolysis.This achieved 86% carbon recovery and 70% hydrogen recovery, confirming that the catalyst efficiently converted aromatics into MWCNTs via a vapor-solid mechanism.”

    From Functional carbon materials from waste plastics: synthesis and applications (2025) · cites this paper as [48]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Q., Jiang, D., Zhou, H., Yuan, X., Wu, C., Hu, C., Luque, R., Wang, S., Chu, S., Xiao, R., & Zhang, H.
Affiliations
  • Southeast University (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Guangdong University of Technology (CN)
  • University of Reggio Calabria (IT)
  • State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Huiyan
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2023-09-11
Volume
120
Issue
39
Pages
e2305078120-e2305078120
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W4386590309
Cited by
102
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 5
FWCI
8.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Government of Jiangsu Province
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20200399)
  • Southeast University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Keywords
monolithic catalysts, multi-walled carbon nanotubes, hydrogen production, carbon recovery, circular economy, plastic pollution, catalyst reusability, waste-to-resource, lithium-ion battery anodes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review