Cited by 13Cellular transport and secretionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchLipid Membrane Structure and Behavior

A lever hypothesis for Synaptotagmin-1 action in neurotransmitter release

Open access
Jaczynska, Klaudia, Esser, Victoria, Xu, Junjie, Sari, Levent, Lin, Milo M., Rosenmund, Christian, Rizo, Josep·2025·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Neurotransmitter release is triggered in microseconds by Ca 2+ -binding to the Synaptotagmin-1 C 2 -domains and by SNARE complexes that form four-helix bundles between synaptic vesicles and plasma membranes, but the coupling mechanism between Ca 2+ -sensing and membrane fusion is unknown. Release requires extension of SNARE helices into juxtamembrane linkers that precede transmembrane regions (linker zippering) and binding of the Synaptotagmin-1 C 2 B domain to SNARE complexes through a “primary interface” comprising two regions (I and II). The Synaptotagmin-1 Ca 2+ -binding loops were believed to accelerate membrane fusion by inducing membrane curvature, perturbing lipid bilayers, or helping bridge the membranes, but SNARE complex binding through the primary interface orients the Ca 2+ -binding loops away from the fusion site, hindering these putative activities. To clarify this paradox, we have used NMR and fluorescence spectroscopy. NMR experiments reveal that binding of C 2 B domain arginines to SNARE acidic residues at region II remains after disruption of region I, and that a mutation that impairs spontaneous and Ca 2+ -triggered neurotransmitter release enhances binding through region I. Moreover, fluorescence assays show that Ca 2+ does not induce dissociation of Synaptotagmin-1 from membrane-anchored SNARE complex but causes reorientation of the C 2 B domain. Based on these results and electrophysiological data described by Toulme et al. ( https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2409636121 ), we propose that upon Ca 2+ binding the Synaptotagmin-1 C 2 B domain reorients on the membrane and dissociates from the SNAREs at region I but not region II, acting remotely as a lever that pulls the SNARE complex and facilitates linker zippering or other SNARE structural changes required for fast membrane fusion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2417941121

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lever model specifically accounts for synchronous release; asynchronous release likely involves high-affinity sensors such as Syt7 or Doc2.

    “This lever model specifically accounts for synchronous release; in contrast, asynchronous release likely involves high-affinity sensors such as Syt7 or Doc2, which operate when the primary interface is not yet mechanically locked by Syt1 or through distinct Ca2+-independent reorientation pathways, reflecting the diverse calcium sensitivities observed in different release modes [24,27].”

    From Molecular Physiology of the Neuronal Synapse (2026) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) identifies Syt1 as essential for fast, synchronous release, and the Results describe a lever hypothesis for fast membrane fusion. Our copy does not support the attributed account of asynchronous release involving Syt7 or Doc2, nor the proposed alternative pathways; searches for asynchronous release and those sensors found no relevant passage. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The "lever hypothesis" proposes that upon calcium binding, the Syt1 C2B domain reorients on the membrane, leading to selective dissociation from SNAREs at region I while maintaining contact at region II, allowing Syt1 to act as a remote lever exerting a pulling force on the SNARE complex.

    “The “lever hypothesis” offers an explanation: upon calcium binding, the Syt1 C2B domain undergoes a reorientation on the membrane [27]. This reorientation leads to a selective dissociation from SNAREs at region I of the primary interface while maintaining contact at region II. This differential interaction and conformational change allows Syt1 to act as a remote lever, exerting a pulling force on”

    From Molecular Physiology of the Neuronal Synapse (2026) · cites this paper as [27]

  • SynCAM1 promotes the recruitment of GluA1-containing AMPA receptors.

    “SynCAM1, for instance, promotes the recruitment of GluA1-containing AMPA receptors [27].”

    From Molecular Physiology of the Neuronal Synapse (2026) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Results passages discuss Synaptotagmin-1, Ca2+, and SNARE-complex interactions, not SynCAM1 or AMPA-receptor recruitment. Searches for “SynCAM1 GluA1-containing AMPA receptors” and “recruitment of AMPA receptors by SynCAM1” found no passage addressing the claim; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [32]J. S. Rhee, Augmenting neurotransmitter release by enhancing the apparent Ca2+ affinity of synaptotagmin 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 18664– 18669 (2005). 16352718 PMC1311909

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaczynska, K., Esser, V., Xu, J., Sari, L., Lin, M. M., Rosenmund, C., & Rizo, J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Rosenmund, Christian
  • Rizo, Josep
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2024-12-30
Volume
122
Issue
1
Pages
e2417941121-e2417941121
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W4405896282
Cited by
13
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 4
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R35 NS097333)
  • Welch Foundation (I-1304)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (278001972-TRR186)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
Keywords
synaptotagmin-1, neurotransmitter release, SNARE complex, C2B domain, synaptic vesicle exocytosis
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Animals, Calcium, Cell Membrane, Humans, Membrane Fusion, Protein Binding, Synaptic Vesicles, Neurotransmitter Agents, SNARE Proteins, Synaptotagmin I

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review