Cited by 348Cellular transport and secretionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchExtracellular vesicles in disease

Architecture of the synaptotagmin–SNARE machinery for neuronal exocytosis

Open access
Zhou, Qiangjun, Lai, Ying, Bacaj, Taulant, Zhao, Minglei, Lyubimov, Artem Y., Uervirojnangkoorn, Monarin, Zeldin, Oliver B., Brewster, Aaron S. +12 more·2015·Nature

Abstract

Synaptotagmin-1 and neuronal SNARE proteins have central roles in evoked synchronous neurotransmitter release; however, it is unknown how they cooperate to trigger synaptic vesicle fusion. Here we report atomic-resolution crystal structures of Ca2+- and Mg2+-bound complexes between synaptotagmin-1 and the neuronal SNARE complex, one of which was determined with diffraction data from an X-ray free-electron laser, leading to an atomic-resolution structure with accurate rotamer assignments for many side chains. The structures reveal several interfaces, including a large, specific, Ca2+-independent and conserved interface. Tests of this interface by mutagenesis suggest that it is essential for Ca2+-triggered neurotransmitter release in mouse hippocampal neuronal synapses and for Ca2+-triggered vesicle fusion in a reconstituted system. We propose that this interface forms before Ca2+ triggering, moves en bloc as Ca2+ influx promotes the interactions between synaptotagmin-1 and the plasma membrane, and consequently remodels the membrane to promote fusion, possibly in conjunction with other interfaces.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper reports crystal structures of Ca2+- and Mg2+-bound synaptotagmin-1–neuronal SNARE complexes, including one determined from X-ray free electron laser diffraction data, revealing a large conserved Ca2+-independent primary interface. Mutagenesis and functional assays indicate this interface is required for efficient Syt1–SNARE binding and Ca2+-triggered evoked release/fusion, supporting a model in which the C2B–SNARE unit moves en bloc upon Ca2+ influx to remodel the membrane.

Key findings

  • The structures reveal three Syt1–SNARE interfaces (“primary,” “secondary,” and “tertiary”) plus a C2A–C2B interface; the primary interface is the largest, similar in both crystal forms and in Ca2+- versus Mg2+-bound structures, has relatively low B-factors, and is conserved across synaptotagmins/SNAP-25/syntaxin-1A homologs involved in fast synchronous release.
  • Mutating primary-interface regions reduced Syt1 binding to syntaxin-1A/SNARE complex by ~50% for region I or region II mutants and to ~33% for the Syt1 quintuple mutant; in single-vesicle content-mixing assays, these mutants reduced vesicle association and Ca2+-triggered fusion amplitude/synchronization but did not affect spontaneous fusion, with the Syt1 quintuple reducing Ca2+-triggered synchronization to the no-Syt1 control level.
  • In Syt1 cKO neurons, region I mutants retained some rescue of evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents, whereas region II mutants were nearly non-functional; triple and quintuple mutants showed more severe phenotypes, and E295A/Y338W rescued spontaneous-release unclamping while region II mutants did not.
  • XFEL data collection used 148 crystals; 113 produced 578 processable images, and the final long-unit-cell dataset used 309 images from 72 crystals. At LCLS, 61 of ~72 long-unit-cell crystals diffracted to at least 3.5 Å, versus 1 of 85 screened long-unit-cell crystals reaching 4.1 Å at APS; refined structures were at 3.50 Å (Ca2+-bound long unit cell), 3.60 Å (Ca2+-bound short unit cell), 4.10 Å (Mg2+-bound short unit cell), and 1.65 Å (Syt1 C2B quintuple mutant).

Methods

  • A Syt1 C2AB–linker–SNAP-25_C chimera plus SNAP-25_N, syntaxin-1A, and synaptobrevin-2 fragments was co-expressed in E. coli, purified, and crystallized as Ca2+- and Mg2+-bound Syt1–SNARE complexes; diffraction data were collected at LCLS XFEL and APS synchrotron beamlines, and structures were determined by molecular replacement and refined with Coot/CNS/phenix.refine.
  • Structure-guided mutations were validated by circular dichroism, size-exclusion chromatography, and a crystal structure of the Syt1 C2B quintuple mutant; functional tests included co-immunoprecipitation from Syt1 cKO neurons, single-vesicle content-mixing assays with full-length Syt1/SNAREs/complexin-1, and electrophysiological recordings in cultured hippocampal neurons.
  • Analyses included crystallographic data/refinement statistics, interface and electrostatic-potential analysis, sequence alignments, comparison with prior smFRET histograms, quantitative immunoblotting, and counting of spontaneous versus Ca2+-triggered fusion events.

Limitations

  • Stated: the XFEL diffraction data had poorer conventional merging statistics than rotation data, and it is difficult to assess their relative quality; lack of available XFEL beamtime prevented collecting a complete dataset beyond 3.5 Å. The authors also note that comparison with a prior NMR study was not possible because covalently attached lanthanide labels would likely disrupt the primary interface.
  • Stated: the minimal reconstituted system lacks other factors, which may explain why the R398Q/R399Q mutant had little effect on synchronization there and why spontaneous release behavior differed between neuronal cultures and the reconstituted assay.
  • Evident from the text: the crystal structures use a Syt1 C2AB fragment and truncated SNARE fragments, and the covalent linker was cleaved during crystallization; functional conclusions rely on designed mutants and may not fully capture full-length protein behavior in native membranes, although the paper argues the linker likely did not affect the final structures.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature14975

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

43 of 77 cited sources checked · 35 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingcitation

    A mutant affecting the polybasic region of Syt1 (R322E, K325E) exhibited a milder phenotype.

    “In contrast, a mutant that affects the polybasic region of Syt1 (R322E, K325E) exhibited a milder phenotype as reported previously30.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] Brewer, K. D. et al. Dynamic binding mode of a Synaptotagmin-1–SNARE complex in solution. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 555–564 (2015) source

      The Results section (‘Correlation of Syt1-SNARE complex binding with Syt1 function’; page unavailable) identifies R322E K325E as a polybasic-region double mutant and describes its impairment of neurotransmitter release as partial. It also says this mutant strongly impaired rescue of evoked release, while other double mutants had much milder effects. The source therefore supports an impairment, but not the unqualified description of this mutant’s phenotype as milder. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation

    All three interfaces between Syt1 and the SNARE complex fall within the range of smFRET efficiency histograms obtained previously.

    “All three interfaces between Syt1 and the SNARE complex fall within the range of smFRET efficiency histograms obtained previously28 (Extended Data Fig. 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] Choi, U. B. et al. Single-molecule FRET-derived model of the synaptotagmin 1-SNARE fusion complex. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 318–324 (2010) source
  • Premisecitation

    Syt1 interacts with the neuronal SNARE complex.

    “Syt1 also interacts with the neuronal SNARE complex based on immunoprecipitation and pull-downs24–27, single molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET)28, and nuclear magnetic resonance29,30 experiments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim4 of 7 sources checked
    • cites [24] Bennett, M. K., Calakos, N. & Scheller, R. H. Syntaxin: a synaptic protein implicated in docking of synaptic vesicles at presynaptic active zones. Science 257, 255–259 (1992) source
    • cites [25] Li, C. et al. Ca2+-dependent and -independent activities of neural and non-neural synaptotagmins. Nature 375, 594–599 (1995) source
    • cites [26] Pang, Z. P., Shin, O.-H., Meyer, A. C., Rosenmund, C. & Südhof, T. C. A gain-of-function mutation in synaptotagmin-1 reveals a critical role of Ca2+-dependent soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor complex binding in synaptic exocytosis. J. Neurosci. 26, 12556–12565 (2006) source
    • cites [27] Rickman, C. et al. Conserved prefusion protein assembly in regulated exocytosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 17, 283–294 (2006) source
    • cites [28] Choi, U. B. et al. Single-molecule FRET-derived model of the synaptotagmin 1-SNARE fusion complex. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 318–324 (2010) source
    • cites [29] Dai, H., Shen, N., Araç, D. & Rizo, J. A quaternary SNARE-synaptotagmin-Ca2+-phospholipid complex in neurotransmitter release. J. Mol. Biol. 367, 848–863 (2007) source
    • cites [30] Brewer, K. D. et al. Dynamic binding mode of a Synaptotagmin-1–SNARE complex in solution. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 555–564 (2015) source
  • Interpretationown data

    The effect of the Syt1 R322E, K325E mutant and reported observations suggest a functional role for the polybasic region.

    “The effect of the Syt1 R322E, K325E mutant (Fig. 4) as well as reported observations29,30,35,44,45 suggests a functional role for the polybasic region.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [29] Dai, H., Shen, N., Araç, D. & Rizo, J. A quaternary SNARE-synaptotagmin-Ca2+-phospholipid complex in neurotransmitter release. J. Mol. Biol. 367, 848–863 (2007) source
    • cites [30] Brewer, K. D. et al. Dynamic binding mode of a Synaptotagmin-1–SNARE complex in solution. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 555–564 (2015) source
    • cites [35] Gaffaney, J. D., Dunning, F. M., Wang, Z., Hui, E. & Chapman, E. R. Synaptotagmin C2B domain regulates Ca2+-triggered fusion in vitro: critical residues revealed by scanning alanine mutagenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 31763–31775 (2008) source
    • cites [44] Masumoto, T. et al. Ca2+-independent syntaxin binding to the C2B effector region of synaptotagmin. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 49, 1–8 (2012) source
    • cites [45] Mackler, J. & Reist, N. Mutations in the second C2 domain of synaptotagmin disrupt synaptic transmission at Drosophila neuromuscular junctions. J. Comp. Neurol. 436, 4–16 (2001) source
  • Interpretationreasoning

    Other dynamic or approximate models of the C2AB-SNARE complex obtained by NMR cannot be readily compared with the previous smFRET studies and the results presented here because of differences in conditions, covalent attachment of lanthanide labels, and lack of atomic resolution.

    “Other dynamic or approximate models of the C2AB-SNARE complex were obtained by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)29,30, but cannot be readily compared with the previous smFRET studies28 and the results presented here because of differences in conditions, particular covalent attachment of lanthanide labels30, and lack of atomic resolution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [29] Dai, H., Shen, N., Araç, D. & Rizo, J. A quaternary SNARE-synaptotagmin-Ca2+-phospholipid complex in neurotransmitter release. J. Mol. Biol. 367, 848–863 (2007) source
    • cites [30] Brewer, K. D. et al. Dynamic binding mode of a Synaptotagmin-1–SNARE complex in solution. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 555–564 (2015) source
    • cites [28] Choi, U. B. et al. Single-molecule FRET-derived model of the synaptotagmin 1-SNARE fusion complex. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 318–324 (2010) source
  • May combine two claims. 49
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 20
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Syt1 binds in a Ca2+-dependent manner to anionic membranes, with anionic phospholipids and synaptotagmin C2 domains together coordinating calcium.

    “Syt1 binds in a Ca2+-dependent manner to anionic membranes; during binding, anionic phospholipids and synaptotagmin C2 domains together coordinate calcium14–17.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [14] Davletov, B. A. & Südhof, T. C. A single C2 domain from synaptotagmin I is sufficient for high affinity Ca2+/phospholipid binding. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 26386–26390 (1993) source
    • cites [15] Brose, N., Petrenko, A. G., Südhof, T. C. & Jahn, R. Synaptotagmin: a calcium sensor on the synaptic vesicle surface. Science 256, 1021–1025 (1992) source
    • cites [16] Fernández-Chacón, R. et al. Synaptotagmin I functions as a calcium regulator of release probability. Nature 410, 41–49 (2001) source
    • cites [17] Vrljic, M. et al. Post-translational modifications and lipid binding profile of insect cell-expressed full-length mammalian synaptotagmin 1. Biochemistry 50, 9998–10012 (2011) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Spontaneous release in the reconstituted system reflects fusion probability at exactly zero Ca2+ concentration, whereas spontaneous release in neurons is driven by resting Ca2+ concentrations and is largely blocked by removing all calcium.

    “We note that spontaneous release observed in our reconstituted system38 reflects the fusion probability at exactly zero Ca2+ concentration (that is, in absence of a Ca2+-sensor for mini-release) whereas spontaneous release in neurons is driven by resting Ca2+-concentrations and is largely blocked by removing all calcium41.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [38] Lai, Y. et al. Complexin inhibits spontaneous release and synchronizes Ca2+-triggered synaptic vesicle fusion by distinct mechanisms. Elife 3, 1–14 (2014) source
    • cites [41] Xu, J., Pang, Z. P., Shin, O.-H. & Südhof, T. C. Synaptotagmin-1 functions as a Ca2+ sensor for spontaneous release. Nature Neurosci. 12, 759–766 (2009) source

      The Results section (“Spontaneous release is Ca2+-dependent”) reports that intracellular Ca2+ chelation blocked more than 95% of spontaneous mIPSCs, supporting the claim about removing calcium. But the Discussion says release is likely triggered by Ca2+ sparks rather than resting presynaptic Ca2+ concentrations. The citation is attached to the neuronal-release claim, not the description of the reconstituted system. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A reasonably complete data set was obtained from a few hundred images using 148 crystals, in contrast to the tens of thousands to millions of crystals typically used in XFEL-based crystallography.

    “Moreover, in contrast to the tens of thousands to millions of crystals typically used in XFEL-based crystallography experiments34, we obtained a reasonably complete data set from a few hundred images using 148 crystals (Methods).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [34] Redecke, L. et al. Natively inhibited Trypanosoma brucei cathepsin B structure determined by using an X-ray laser. Science 339, 227–230 (2013) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Region I mutants retained some rescue ability, whereas region II mutants were nearly non-functional, including the R398Q, R399Q mutant.

    “Interestingly, the region I mutants retained some rescue ability, in contrast to region II mutants that were nearly non-functional (Figs. 4a, b), including the R398Q, R399Q mutant as previously reported36.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] Xue, M., Ma, C., Craig, T. K., Rosenmund, C. & Rizo, J. The Janus-faced nature of the C2B domain is fundamental for synaptotagmin-1 function. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 1160–1168 (2008) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Upon Ca2+ binding to the Syt1 C2B domain, the Ca2+ binding loops partially insert into the membrane with a preference for membrane curvature, possibly supported by ionic interactions via the polybasic region and with continuing maintenance of the Syt1-SNARE interface.

    “Upon Ca2+ binding to the Syt1 C2B domain, the Ca2+ binding loops partially insert into the membrane23 with a preference for membrane curvature20,21, possibly supported by ionic interactions via the polybasic region and with continuing maintenance of the Syt1-SNARE interface.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [23] Rufener, E., Frazier, A. A., Wieser, C. M., Hinderliter, A. & Cafiso, D. S. Membrane-bound orientation and position of the synaptotagmin C2B domain determined by site-directed spin labeling. Biochemistry 44, 18–28 (2005) source
    • cites [20] Hui, E., Johnson, C. P., Yao, J., Dunning, F. M. & Chapman, E. R. Synaptotagmin-mediated bending of the target membrane is a critical step in Ca2+-regulated fusion. Cell 138, 709–721 (2009) source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [21] Martens, S., Kozlov, M. M. & McMahon, H. T. How synaptotagmin promotes membrane fusion. Science 316, 1205–1208 (2007) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Covalent lanthanide labels attached to SNAP-25 residues 41 and 166 would likely disrupt the primary interface, so the crystal structures cannot be compared with that NMR study.

    “In a recent study, lanthanide labels were covalently attached to SNAP-25 residues 41 and 166 for pseudocontact chemical shift NMR measurements in the presence of 125 thiocyanate30; these covalent labels would likely disrupt the primary interface (Fig. 2c), so it is not possible to compare our crystal structures with this NMR study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] Brewer, K. D. et al. Dynamic binding mode of a Synaptotagmin-1–SNARE complex in solution. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 555–564 (2015) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The observed smFRET histograms suggested several possible interfaces between Syt1 and the SNARE complex.

    “The observed smFRET histograms28 suggested several possible interfaces between Syt1 and the SNARE complex.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] Choi, U. B. et al. Single-molecule FRET-derived model of the synaptotagmin 1-SNARE fusion complex. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 318–324 (2010) source

      The Discussion (page not provided) says that broad, multi-peaked intermolecular smFRET distributions suggest multiple conformations of the Syt1–SNARE complex. It does not say that the histograms suggest several distinct binding interfaces; the Results instead describe a dominant modeled interface. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A gain-of-function mutation in the Ca2+-binding region of the C2A domain suggested that the Syt1-SNARE interaction may be functionally important.

    “A gain-of-function mutation in the Ca2+-binding region of the C2A domain suggested that the Syt1-SNARE interaction may be functionally important26, but the molecular basis and the significance of the interaction between Syt1 and the SNARE complex remain unknown.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Pang, Z. P., Shin, O.-H., Meyer, A. C., Rosenmund, C. & Südhof, T. C. A gain-of-function mutation in synaptotagmin-1 reveals a critical role of Ca2+-dependent soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor complex binding in synaptic exocytosis. J. Neurosci. 26, 12556–12565 (2006) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The gain-of-function mutation D232N in the Ca2+-binding region of the C2A domain is close to the tertiary interface and is also part of the C2A-C2B interface.

    “Interestingly, the gain-of-function mutation D232N in the Ca2+-binding region of the C2A domain26 is close to the tertiary interface and it is also part of the C2A-C2B interface (Fig. 1b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Pang, Z. P., Shin, O.-H., Meyer, A. C., Rosenmund, C. & Südhof, T. C. A gain-of-function mutation in synaptotagmin-1 reveals a critical role of Ca2+-dependent soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor complex binding in synaptic exocytosis. J. Neurosci. 26, 12556–12565 (2006) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The palmitoylated cysteine residues of SNAP-25 would be able to interact with the plasma membrane, and the membrane-proximal side of syntaxin is closely juxtaposed with the membrane, as inferred by the requirement of tight membrane-coupling of syntaxin for evoked release.

    “The palmitoylated cysteine residues of SNAP-25 would be able to interact with the plasma membrane, and the membrane-proximal side of syntaxin is closely juxtaposed with the membrane, as inferred by the requirement of tight membrane-coupling of syntaxin for evoked release47.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [47] Zhou, P., Bacaj, T., Yang, X., Pang, Z. P. & Südhof, T. C. Lipid-anchored SNAREs lacking transmembrane regions fully support membrane fusion during neurotransmitter release. Neuron 80, 470–483 (2013) source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Assays based on lipid mixing alone can produce misleading results since lipid mixing can occur without content mixing.

    “More importantly, assays based on lipid mixing alone can produce misleading results since lipid mixing can occur without content mixing86.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [86] Zick, M. & Wickner, W. T. A distinct tethering step is vital for vacuole membrane fusion. Elife 3, e03251 (2014) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Ramachandran analysis with MolProbity indicated that 98% of residues are in favored regions and none are in disallowed regions for the quintuple mutant of the Syt1 C2B domain.

    “Ramachandran analysis with MolProbity75 indicated that 98% of the residues are in the favored regions and none are in disallowed regions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [75] Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: All-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 12–21 (2010) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Addition of complexin-1 greatly enhanced Ca2+-triggered amplitude and synchronization, and suppressed spontaneous release in this system.

    “Moreover, addition of complexin-1 greatly enhanced Ca2+-triggered amplitude and synchronization, and suppressed spontaneous release in this system38.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] Lai, Y. et al. Complexin inhibits spontaneous release and synchronizes Ca2+-triggered synaptic vesicle fusion by distinct mechanisms. Elife 3, 1–14 (2014) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The size distributions of the SV and PM vesicles were analyzed by cryo-EM.

    “The size distributions of the SV and PM vesicles were analyzed by cryo-EM, as described previously37.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37] Diao, J. et al. Synaptic proteins promote calcium-triggered fast transition from point contact to full fusion. Elife 1, e00109 (2012) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The single vesicle-vesicle assay uses full-length Syt1 and monitors content mixing, a correlate for neurotransmitter release.

    “Our single vesicle-vesicle assay thus uses full-length Syt1 and it monitors content mixing, a correlate for neurotransmitter release37,38,81.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [37] Diao, J. et al. Synaptic proteins promote calcium-triggered fast transition from point contact to full fusion. Elife 1, e00109 (2012) source
    • cites [38] Lai, Y. et al. Complexin inhibits spontaneous release and synchronizes Ca2+-triggered synaptic vesicle fusion by distinct mechanisms. Elife 3, 1–14 (2014) source
    • cites [81] Kyoung, M. et al. In vitro system capable of differentiating fast Ca2+-triggered content mixing from lipid exchange for mechanistic studies of neurotransmitter release. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, E304–E313 (2011) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A variety of complexin-1 truncations and mutations qualitatively reproduced effects observed in neuronal cultures for both spontaneous and Ca2+-triggered release, lending credence to this reconstituted system to investigate mechanistic questions.

    “A variety of complexin-1 truncations and mutations qualitatively reproduced effects observed in neuronal cultures for both spontaneous and Ca2+-triggered release38, lending credence to this reconstituted system to investigate mechanistic questions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] Lai, Y. et al. Complexin inhibits spontaneous release and synchronizes Ca2+-triggered synaptic vesicle fusion by distinct mechanisms. Elife 3, 1–14 (2014) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Ramachandran analysis with MolProbity indicated that 98% of residues are in favored regions and none are in disallowed regions for both the Ca2+- and Mg2+-bound Syt1-SNARE complexes in the short unit cell crystal form.

    “Ramachandran analysis with MolProbity75 indicated that 98% of the residues are in the favored regions and none are in disallowed regions for both the Ca2+- and Mg2+-bound Syt1-SNARE complexes in the short unit cell crystal form”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [75] Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: All-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 12–21 (2010) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Similar improvements in limiting resolution of XFEL versus synchrotron diffraction images have been observed for GPCRs.

    “We note that similar improvements in limiting resolution of XFEL versus synchrotron diffraction images have been observed for GPCRs60.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [60] Cohen, A. E. et al. Goniometer-based femtosecond crystallography with X-ray free electron lasers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17122–17127 (2014) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Ramachandran analysis with MolProbity indicated that 97% of residues are in favored regions and none are in disallowed regions for the Ca2+-bound Syt1-SNARE complex in the long unit cell crystal form.

    “and that 97% of the residues are in the favored regions and none are in disallowed regions for the Ca2+-bound Syt1-SNARE complex in the long unit cell crystal form.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [75] Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: All-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 12–21 (2010) source

      The 'Torsion-angle combinations: updated Ramachandran and rotamer analyses' section (page not specified) confirms that MolProbity evaluates Ramachandran conformations and reports percentages of favored residues and outliers. It does not report an analysis of the Ca2+-bound Syt1-SNARE complex or substantiate the claimed 97% favored and zero disallowed residues. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The C2A domain forming the tertiary interface is in the same orientation in both crystal forms and in Ca2+- and Mg2+-bound structures, and the interacting side chains are in similar positions.

    “The C2A domain that forms the tertiary interface is in the same orientation in both crystal forms and in the Ca2+- and Mg2+-bound crystal structures (Extended Data Figs. 5c, d) and the interacting side chains are in similar positions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The residues involved in the primary interface have relatively low temperature factors and well-defined electron densities, suggesting a specific interaction.

    “The residues involved in the primary interface have relatively low temperature factors, among the lowest in these structures (Extended Data Fig. 5e), and the electron densities of the sidechains that form this interface are well-defined (Figs. 2c, d), suggesting a specific interaction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The secondary interface involves another Syt1 C2B domain and the SNARE complex, while the tertiary interface involves a Syt1 C2A domain and the SNARE complex.

    “The secondary interface involves another Syt1 C2B domain and the SNARE complex, while the tertiary interface involves a Syt1 C2A domain and the SNARE complex (Fig. 1b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    The primary interface between the Syt1 C2B domain and the SNARE complex is large, specific, Ca2+-independent, and conserved.

    “The structures revealed several interfaces, including a large, specific, Ca2+-independent, and conserved interface.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The primary interface is very similar in both complexes and both crystal forms, suggesting it is not affected by crystal packing.

    “The largest, primary interface between the Syt1 C2B domain and the SNARE complex is very similar in both complexes (Fig. 1b) and in both crystal forms (Extended Data Fig. 5a), suggesting that it is not affected by crystal packing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Removal of Syt1 abolished synchronous release monitored by eIPSCs, a phenotype rescued by re-introduction of WT but not mutant Syt1 cDNA.

    “As expected7, removal of Syt1 abolished synchronous release monitored by recording evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents (eIPSCs), a phenotype that can be rescued by re-introduction of WT but not mutant Syt1 cDNA (Figs. 4a, b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] Geppert, M. et al. Synaptotagmin I: a major Ca2+ sensor for transmitter release at a central synapse. Cell 79, 717–727 (1994) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The electron density maps from the XFEL data were notably superior to those of the synchrotron datasets and of sufficient quality to obtain accurate rotamers for most sidechains, including at interfaces.

    “The electron density maps obtained from the XFEL diffraction data were notably superior to those of the synchrotron datasets (Methods). In particular, the electron density maps calculated from the XFEL data set were of sufficient quality to obtain accurate rotamers for most sidechains, including those at the interfaces between molecules (Extended Data Figs. 2d–f).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The primary interface is divided into two regions dominated by polar interactions: region I comprises SNAP-25 E37, K40, N159, M163, D166 and Syt1 E295, K297, N336 and Y338; region II comprises SNAP-25 D51, E52, E55, syntaxin-1A D231, E234, E238, and Syt1 R281, K288, R398, and R399.

    “We divide the primary interface into two regions (Fig. 2) dominated by polar interactions: region I comprises SNAP-25 E37, K40, N159, M163, D166 and Syt1 E295, K297, N336 and Y338; region II comprises SNAP-25 D51, E52, E55, syntaxin-1A D231, E234, E238, and Syt1 R281, K288, R398, and R399.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The E295A, Y338W mutant could rescue the unclamping of spontaneous release phenotype while region II mutants (or combinations thereof) could not.

    “Interestingly, the E295A, Y338W mutant could rescue this phenotype while the region II mutants (or combinations thereof) could not (Figs. 4f, g).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The paper reports atomic-resolution crystal structures of a Syt1-SNARE complex in two different crystal forms and in the presence of either Ca2+ or Mg2+.

    “Here we report atomic-resolution crystal structures of Ca2+- and Mg2+-bound complexes between synaptotagmin-1 and the neuronal SNARE complex, one of which was determined with diffraction data from an X-ray free electron laser, leading to an atomic-resolution structure with accurate rotamer assignments for many sidechains.”
    • Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
      “Here we report atomic-resolution crystal structures of a Syt1-SNARE complex in two different crystal forms and in the presence of either Ca2+ or Mg2+.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The primary interface is very similar in Ca2+-bound and Mg2+-bound crystal structures, implying a Ca2+-independent interface.

    “The primary interface is also very similar in the Ca2+-bound as well as in the Mg2+-bound crystal structures (Extended Data Fig. 5d), implying a Ca2+-independent interface.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Mutation of either region I or II of the primary interface reduced Syt1 binding to syntaxin-1A/SNARE complex by ~50%, and simultaneous mutation of both regions reduced binding to ~33% compared to WT Syt1.

    “Mutation of either regions I and II of the primary interface reduced Syt1 binding to syntaxin-1A/SNARE complex by ~50%, and simultaneous mutation of both regions (“Syt1 quintuple”) reduced binding to ~33% as compared to a Syt1 WT construct introduced in the same manner (Figs. 3b, c).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The SNARE complex is positively charged and Syt1 is negatively charged in region I, whereas the opposite is observed for region II.

    “The SNARE complex is positively charged and Syt1 is negatively charged in region I, whereas the opposite is observed for region II.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All Syt1 mutants underwent facilitation and the severity of the phenotype for each mutant correlated well with the results for single evoked release.

    “All Syt1 mutants underwent facilitation and the severity of the phenotype for each mutant correlated well with the results for single evoked release.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    ATP has no effect on spontaneous and Ca2+-triggered fusion and only a mild effect on vesicle association, suggesting that functionally important Syt1-SNARE interactions are not affected by ionic shielding.

    “We observed no effect on both spontaneous and Ca2+-triggered fusion, and only a mild effect on vesicle association (Figs. 3d–g, right group of mutants), suggesting that the functionally important interactions between Syt1 and the SNARE complex are not affected by ionic shielding.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    During high frequency stimulation, WT cultured hippocampal neurons displayed depression while Syt1 cKO neurons showed asynchronous release with robust facilitation.

    “During high frequency stimulation, WT cultured hippocampal neurons displayed depression while Syt1 cKO neurons showed asynchronous release with robust facilitation (Figs. 4c–e).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both groups of mutants reduce the amplitude and decrease the synchronization of Ca2+-triggered fusion, but do not affect spontaneous fusion.

    “Likewise, both groups of mutants reduce the amplitude and decrease the synchronization of Ca2+-triggered fusion, but they do not affect spontaneous fusion (Figs. 3e–g).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    There were consistently two crystal forms in the same drop with identical morphology, referred to as short unit cell and long unit cell crystal forms.

    “There were consistently two crystal forms in the same drop with identical morphology, referred to as “short unit cell” crystal form and “long unit cell” crystal form, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Improved diffraction quality could be achieved by placing consecutive shots far apart across the length of the crystal from one another, then later filling between the first and second shots in the same shuttling manner.

    “During data collection we observed that improved diffraction quality could be achieved by placing consecutive shots far apart (i.e., across the length of the crystal from one another), then later “filling” between the first and second shots in the same “shuttling” manner.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Only one out of 85 screened crystals in the long unit cell crystal form diffracted to 4.1 Å resolution at the APS NE-CAT microfocus synchrotron beamline.

    “Only one out of 85 screened crystals in the long unit cell crystal form diffracted to 4.1 Å resolution at the APS NE-CAT microfocus synchrotron beamline”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Exposure to Cre-recombinase results in the total absence of synchronous release, which is typical for Syt1 KO neurons.

    “Exposure to Cre-recombinase results in the total absence of synchronous release which is typical for Syt1 KO neurons (Fig. 4a, b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Only 1 out of 85 screened crystals in the long unit cell form diffracted to 4.1 Å at APS, while 61 out of about 72 long unit cell crystals diffracted to at least 3.5 Å at LCLS.

    “It is notable that only 1 out of 85 screened crystals in the long unit cell form diffracted to 4.1 Å at APS, while 61 out of ~ 72 long unit cell crystals diffracted to at least 3.5 Å at LCLS.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The long unit cell form occurred much more frequently, at about 80%.

    “The long unit cell form occurred much more frequently (about 80%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The primary interfaces have relatively low B-factors, similar to the majority of the structure, while parts of the C2A and C2B domains involved in the secondary and tertiary interfaces have higher B-factors.

    “Note that the primary interfaces have relatively low B-factors, similar to the majority of the structure, while parts of the C2A and C2B domains involved in the secondary and tertiary interfaces have higher B-factors”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The short unit cell crystal form produced a limiting resolution of 3.6 Å at APS NE-CAT, but the density maps are substantially less well defined for sidechains compared to the LCLS data set.

    “Interestingly, while the short unit cell crystal form produced a limiting resolution of 3.6 Å at APS NE-CAT, the density maps are substantially less well defined for sidechains compared to the LCLS data set (compare Extended Data Figs. 2c–f and Figs. 3b, c).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Of the 148 crystals used in the experiment, 113 produced 578 images that could be processed; the other crystals did not diffract or showed multiple lattices.

    “Of the 148 crystals used in the experiment, 113 crystals produced 578 images that could be processed; the other crystals did not diffract or showed multiple lattices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The primary interface is very similar in both crystal forms: the RMSD for the primary interface between both crystal forms is 0.38 Å (bright-orange) and 0.42 Å (white) for complex I and complex II, respectively.

    “The primary interface is very similar in both crystal forms: the RMSD for the primary interface between both crystal forms is 0.38 Å (bright-orange) and 0.42 Å (white) for complex I and complex II, respectively”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Using a reverse vapor-diffusion method led to thicker crystal plates and eventually produced Bragg peaks past 4 Å resolution.

    “Using a reverse vapor-diffusion method led to thicker crystal plates (Extended Data Fig. 1e), and eventually produced Bragg peaks past 4 Å resolution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The entire crystal was damaged when exposed at room temperature, requiring many more crystals and much more time to collect a complete diffraction dataset.

    “Furthermore, the entire crystal was damaged when exposed at room temperature, requiring many more crystals and much more time to collect a complete diffraction dataset.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The final model of the quintuple mutant of the Syt1 C2B domain consists of four Syt1 C2B molecules in the asymmetric unit.

    “The final model consists of four Syt1 C2B molecules in the asymmetric unit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This morphological change of the plasma membrane juxtaposes the membranes closer than the critical distance (0.9 nm) to promote stalk formation, and subsequently leads to fusion pore opening.

    “This morphological change of the plasma membrane juxtaposes the membranes closer than the critical distance (0.9 nm) to promote stalk formation48 (Fig. 5d), and subsequently leads to fusion pore opening (Fig. 5e).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [48] Aeffner, S., Reusch, T., Weinhausen, B. & Salditt, T. Energetics of stalk intermediates in membrane fusion are controlled by lipid composition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E1609–E1618 (2012) source
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Prior to Ca2+ influx, there is a membrane juxtaposed, hemifusion-free state, the likely starting state for fast Ca2+ triggered fusion, and a partially folded trans-SNARE complex.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The Syt1 C2B-SNARE unit can assemble in the pre-Ca2+ state.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The primary Syt1-SNARE interface is critical for the role of Syt1 as a Ca2+ sensor of evoked release, but is not required for spontaneous release in neurons.

    “Together, these observations support the notion that the primary Syt1-SNARE interface is critical for the role of Syt1 as a Ca2+ sensor of evoked release, but that this Syt1-SNARE interface is not required for spontaneous release in neurons, consistent with the differential effect of Syt1 mutations on spontaneous and evoked release11–13.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [11] Yoshihara, M. & Littleton, J. T. Synaptotagmin I functions as a calcium sensor to synchronize neurotransmitter release. Neuron 36, 897–908 (2002) source
    • cites [12] Maximov, A. & Südhof, T. C. Autonomous function of synaptotagmin 1 in triggering synchronous release independent of asynchronous release. Neuron 48, 547–554 (2005) source
    • cites [13] Kochubey, O. & Schneggenburger, R. Synaptotagmin increases the dynamic range of synapses by driving Ca2+-evoked release and by clamping a near-linear remaining Ca2+ sensor. Neuron 69, 736–748 (2011) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    All of these interactions may be anchored by the primary interface, which is the most stable and extensive contact site.

    “All of these interactions may be anchored by the primary interface, which is the most stable and extensive contact site.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Tests of the primary interface by mutagenesis suggest that it is essential for Ca2+-triggered neurotransmitter release in neuronal synapses and for Ca2+-triggered vesicle fusion in a reconstituted system.

    “Tests of this interface by mutagenesis suggest that it is essential for Ca2+-triggered neurotransmitter release in neuronal synapses and for Ca2+-triggered vesicle fusion in a reconstituted system.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Other synaptotagmin isoforms not involved in fast synchronous release exhibit sequence variations and differences in electrostatic potential maps in both regions, suggesting that the primary interface may be specific for fast synchronous release.

    “In contrast, other synaptotagmin isoforms not involved in fast synchronous release exhibit sequence variations and differences in the electrostatic potential maps in both regions (Extended Data Figs. 6a, b), suggesting that the primary interface may be an interaction that is specific for fast synchronous release.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The entire Syt1-SNARE assembly would be poised to confer cooperativity upon Ca2+-triggering on a sub-millisecond timescale.

    “This entire Syt1-SNARE assembly would thus be poised to confer cooperativity upon Ca2+-triggering on a sub-millisecond timescale.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Prior to Ca2+ influx, there is a membrane juxtaposed, hemifusion-free state, the likely starting state for fast Ca2+ triggered fusion, and a partially folded trans-SNARE complex.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The Syt1 C2B-SNARE unit can assemble in the pre-Ca2+ state.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Increased ensemble lipid mixing was observed upon addition of the soluble Syt1 C2AB fragment and Ca2+.

    “For example, increased ensemble lipid mixing was observed upon addition of the soluble Syt1 C2AB fragment and Ca2+ (ref. 21).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] Martens, S., Kozlov, M. M. & McMahon, H. T. How synaptotagmin promotes membrane fusion. Science 316, 1205–1208 (2007) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Only a lack of available XFEL beamtime prevented the authors from collecting a complete diffraction dataset beyond 3.5 Å.

    “In fact, only a lack of available XFEL beamtime prevented us from collecting a complete diffraction dataset beyond 3.5 Å.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The presence and purity of reconstituted proteins was confirmed by SDS-PAGE, and the directionality of the membrane proteins facing outward was assessed by chymotrypsin digestion followed by SDS-PAGE.

    “As described previously81, the presence and purity of reconstituted proteins was confirmed by SDS-PAGE of the vesicle preparations, and the directionality of the membrane proteins (facing outward) was assessed by chymotrypsin digestion followed by SDS-PAGE.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [81] Kyoung, M. et al. In vitro system capable of differentiating fast Ca2+-triggered content mixing from lipid exchange for mechanistic studies of neurotransmitter release. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, E304–E313 (2011) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    As a consequence of the 16-degree rotation, the interactions between residues R281, K288, R398 of the Syt1 C2B (I′) domain and residues E224, E228 of syntaxin-1A are slightly changed.

    “as a consequence, the interactions between residues R281, K288, R398 of the Syt1 C2B (I′) domain and residues E224, E228 of syntaxin-1A are slightly changed by this rotation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The best constructs resulted in a Syt1-SNARE complex that eluted in a mono-disperse peak and remained stable in SDS-PAGE without boiling, a hallmark for neuronal SNARE complex formation.

    “The best constructs resulted in a Syt1-SNARE complex that eluted in a mono-disperse peak in the final size-exclusion chromatography step, and that remained stable in SDS-PAGE without boiling, a hallmark for neuronal SNARE complex formation (Extended Data Fig. 1b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The role of the region II interacting residues was unclear in the absence of structural information, which now reveals that they are part of a larger interface between Syt1 and the SNARE complex.

    “However, the role of these residues was unclear in the absence of structural information, which now reveals that they are part of a larger interface between Syt1 and the SNARE complex.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The role of the region II interacting residues was unclear in the absence of structural information.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    In retrospect, the increased ensemble lipid mixing result was probably caused by an effect on vesicle association since multivalent binding of the soluble Syt1 C2AB fragment can induce vesicle clustering.

    “However, in retrospect, this result was probably caused by an effect on vesicle association since multivalent binding of the soluble Syt1 C2AB fragment can induce vesicle clustering19.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] Araç, D. et al. Close membrane-membrane proximity induced by Ca2+-dependent multivalent binding of synaptotagmin-1 to phospholipids. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 209–217 (2006) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The maps from XFEL data, superior to those of the short unit cell data crystal structure collected at APS NE-CAT at comparable limiting resolution, enabled better investigation of the binding interfaces between Syt1 and the SNARE complex, and were essential for the structural portion of the study.

    “These maps, superior to those of the short unit cell data crystal structure collected at the APS NE-CAT microfocus synchrotron beamline at comparable limiting resolution (Extended Data Figs. 3b, c), enabled us to better investigate the binding interfaces between Syt1 and the SNARE complex, and was thus essential for the structural portion of our study.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The LCLS diffraction data set proved notably superior to the particular synchrotron-derived datasets collected in terms of limiting resolution and quality of the electron density maps, and was thus essential for more accurately determining side chain positions.

    “Taken together, the LCLS diffraction data set proved notably superior to the particular synchrotron-derived datasets that we collected in terms of limiting resolution and quality of the electron density maps, and was thus essential for more accurately determining side chain positions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Taking into account the smaller number of molecules in the asymmetric unit of the short unit cell crystal form, there are still fewer Ca2+ sites observed in maps derived from the APS data set, suggesting that Ca2+-binding sites have been affected by radiation damage.

    “Taking into account the smaller number of molecules in the asymmetric unit of the short unit cell crystal form (2 Syt1 and 1 SNARE complex compared 3 Syt1 and 2 SNARE complexes), there are still fewer Ca2+ sites that were observed in maps derived from the data set collected at APS, suggesting that Ca2+-binding sites have been affected by radiation damage.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    A subset of the interacting residues of region II were suggested to be functionally important in previous studies: Syt1 R398, R399, and SNAP-25 D51, E52, E55.

    “A subset of the interacting residues of region II were suggested to be functionally important in previous studies: Syt1 R398, R399 (refs. 35,36,78), and SNAP-25 D51, E52, E55 (refs. 27,79,80).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites refs. 35,36,78

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites refs. 27,79,80

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

66 of 66
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Prior to Ca2+ influx, there is a membrane juxtaposed, hemifusion-free state, the likely starting state for fast Ca2+ triggered fusion, and a partially folded trans-SNARE complex.

    “Prior to Ca2+ influx, we assume a membrane juxtaposed, hemifusion-free state (Fig. 5c), the likely starting state for fast Ca2+ triggered fusion37, and a partially folded trans-SNARE complex46.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The Syt1 C2B-SNARE unit can assemble in the pre-Ca2+ state.

    “We assume that the Syt1 C2B-SNARE unit can assemble in this state since the primary interface involves residues within the folded region of the trans-SNARE complex.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The atomic-resolution structure of the complex between Syt1 and the neuronal SNARE complex has been elusive.

    “However, the atomic-resolution structure of the complex between Syt1 and the neuronal SNARE complex (referred to as Syt1-SNARE complex) has been elusive.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The molecular basis and the significance of the interaction between Syt1 and the SNARE complex remain unknown.

    “but the molecular basis and the significance of the interaction between Syt1 and the SNARE complex remain unknown.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    It is unknown how Syt1 and neuronal SNARE proteins cooperate to trigger synaptic vesicle fusion.

    “However, it is unknown how they cooperate to trigger synaptic vesicle fusion.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    It is unknown at the atomic level of detail how these factors cooperate with SNAREs to promote synaptic transmission.

    “but it is unknown at the atomic level of detail how these factors cooperate with SNAREs to promote synaptic transmission.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Interactions in region I have not been implicated in any previous studies.

    “Moreover, interactions in region I (Fig. 2a) have not been implicated in any previous studies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The role of the region II interacting residues was unclear in the absence of structural information.

    “However, the role of these residues was unclear in the absence of structural information, which now reveals that they are part of a larger interface between Syt1 and the SNARE complex.”
8 of 8

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 95 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, Q., Lai, Y., Bacaj, T., Zhao, M., Lyubimov, A. Y., Uervirojnangkoorn, M., Zeldin, O. B., Brewster, A. S., Sauter, N. K., Cohen, A. E., Soltis, S. M., Alonso-Mori, R., Chollet, M., Lemke, H. T., Pfuetzner, R. A., Choi, U. B., Weis, W. I., Diao, J., Südhof, T. C., & Brunger, A. T.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Südhof, Thomas C.
Venue
Nature
Published
2015-08-17
Volume
525
Issue
7567
Pages
62-67
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2128007435
Cited by
348
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 6
FWCI
18.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • U.S. Department of Energy (76SF00515, DE–AC02–76SF00515, P41 GM103403, P41GM103393, AC02‐76SF00515, DE-AC02-)
  • National Institutes of Health (3p41gm103403-15s1, 8p41gm103393-33, DE-AC02-76SF00515, R37 MH63105, P41 GM103403, P41 GM103393, MH086403, GM103403, GM102520, GM095887)
  • Office of Science (AC02-76SF00515, P41GM103393, DE-AC02-76SF0051 5, DE-AC02, 76SF00515)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R37 MH063105, MH086403, P50 MH086403, R37MH63105)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01-GM095887, R01 GM102520, P41-GM-103393, R01 GM077071, GM095887, DE-AC02-76SF00515, P41GM103403, GM102520, GM-103403)
  • Basic Energy Sciences (DE-AC02, P41GM103393, 76SF00515, AC02-76SF00515, GM103403, DE-AC-02-76SF00515)
  • Biological and Environmental Research (P41 GM103393, DE- AC0276SF00515)
  • SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (DEAC02−76SF00515, AC02‐76SF00515, P41GM103393)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
Keywords
synaptotagmin-1, synaptic vesicle fusion, neurotransmitter release, calcium-triggered exocytosis, protein complex crystal structure, hippocampal synapses, membrane remodeling
MeSH terms
Animals, Binding Sites, Calcium, Cell Membrane, Electrons, Exocytosis, Hippocampus, Lasers, Magnesium, Membrane Fusion, Models, Biological, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Synaptic Transmission, Neurons, Synaptic Vesicles, Crystallography, X-Ray, SNARE Proteins, Synaptotagmins, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-12.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-12.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review