Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Importance of primer selection for the detection of hepatitis C virus RNA with the polymerase chain reaction assay.

Open access
Bukh, J, Purcell, R H, Miller, R H·1992·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

We compared four primer sets from conserved regions of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) genome for their ability to detect HCV RNA in a "nested" cDNA polymerase chain reaction assay on sera from 114 anti-HCV antibody-positive individuals from around the world. The different primer sets had equivalent sensitivity, detecting less than 1 chimpanzee ID50 (dose that infects 50%) when tested against reference strain H of HCV. We tested equal amounts of RNA extracted from the serum of each individual with the four primer sets. The set derived from two highly conserved domains within the 5' noncoding (NC) region of the HCV genome, which also share significant similarity with Pestivirus 5' NC sequences, was the most effective at detecting HCV RNA. All samples positive for HCV RNA with any other primer set were also positive with the primer set from the 5' NC region, and the latter was at least 3 times more likely to detect HCV infection than a primer set from within the nonstructural protein 3-like gene region (P less than 0.001). We had no false positive results in greater than 500 negative controls interspersed among the test samples. The 5' NC region primer set detected HCV-specific RNA, verified by high-stringency Southern blot hybridization and DNA sequencing, in 100% of 15 acute and 33 chronic non-A, non-B hepatitis patients from the United States, Europe, and Asia and 10 hepatocellular carcinoma patients from Africa and Asia that tested negative for the hepatitis B virus-encoded surface antigen. In conclusion, use of an appropriate primer set is crucial for detecting HCV RNA in the serum of infected individuals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.89.1.187

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 272

Metadata

Authors
Bukh, J., Purcell, R. H., & Miller, R. H.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1992-01
Volume
89
Issue
1
Pages
187-191
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1969130283
Cited by
272
References
28
FWCI
19.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Importance of primer selection for the detection of hepatitis C virus RNA with the polymerase chain reaction assay. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.89.1.187
The paper
Bukh, J., Purcell, R. H., & Miller, R. H. (1992). Importance of primer selection for the detection of hepatitis C virus RNA with the polymerase chain reaction assay. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.1.187

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.