Cited by 1,014Chemical Synthesis and AnalysisDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryClick Chemistry and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Encoded combinatorial chemistry.

Open access
Brenner, S, Lerner, R A·1992·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The diversity of chemical synthesis and the power of genetics are linked to provide a powerful, versatile method for drug screening. A process of alternating parallel combinatorial synthesis is used to encode individual members of a large library of chemicals with unique nucleotide sequences. After the chemical entity is bound to a target, the genetic tag can be amplified by replication and utilized for enrichment of the bound molecules by serial hybridization to a subset of the library. The nature of the chemical structure bound to the receptor is decoded by sequencing the nucleotide tag.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.89.12.5381

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [2]Geysen, H. M., Meloen, R. H. & Barteling, S. J. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 3998–4002.
  2. [6]Cwirla, S. E., Peters, E. A., Barrett, R. W. & Dower, W. J. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 6378–6382.
  3. [9]Crick, F. H. C., Griffith, J. S. & Orgel, L. E. (1957) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 43, 416–421.
  4. [10]Merrifield, B. (1984) Les Prix Nobel (Almqvist & Wiksell International, Stockholm), pp. 127–153.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Brenner, S., & Lerner, R. A.
Affiliations
Scripps Research Institute (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1992-06-15
Volume
89
Issue
12
Pages
5381-5383
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2017423606
Cited by
1,014
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
8.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Click Chemistry and Applications
Keywords
drug screening, gene tagging, ligand-receptor binding
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Base Sequence, Molecular Sequence Data, Peptides, Restriction Mapping, Drug Design, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review