The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spatial games and the maintenance of cooperation.
Open accessAbstract
The Prisoner's Dilemma (PD) is a widely employed metaphor for problems associated with the evolution of cooperative behavior. We have recently proposed an alternative approach to the PD, by exploring "spatial games" in which players--who are either pure cooperators, C, or pure defectors, D--interact with neighbors in some spatial array; in each generation, players add up the scores from all encounters, and in the next generation a given cell is retained by its previous owner or taken over by a neighbor, depending on who has the largest score. Over a wide range of the relevant parameters, we find that C and D persist together indefinitely (without any of the complex strategies that remember past encounters, and anticipate future ones, which characterize essentially all previous work on the iterated PD). Our earlier work, however, dealt with symmetric spatial lattices in two dimensions, deterministic winning and discrete time. We show here that the essential results remain valid in more realistic situations where the spatial distributions of cells are random in two or three dimensions, and where winning is partly probabilistic (rather than being determined by the largest local total). The essential results also remain valid (pace Huberman and Glance [Huberman, B. A. & Glance, N. S. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 7716-7718]) when interactions occur in continuous rather than discrete time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7466396 · Cited by 20,065
A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner's Dilemma game
Nowak, M., & Sigmund, K. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/364056a0 · Cited by 1,797
Self-citationSmith, J. M. (1974) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,141
The Further Evolution of Cooperation
Axelrod, R., & Dion, D. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.242.4884.1385 · Cited by 840
TIT FOR TAT in sticklebacks and the evolution of cooperation
Milinski, M. (1987) · Nature · doi:10.1038/325433a0 · Cited by 604
Evolutionary games and computer simulations.
Huberman, B. A., & Glance, N. S. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.16.7716 · Cited by 568
Cited by
Barthélemy, M. (2011) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.11.002 · Cited by 2,469
Strategy selection in structured populations
Tarnita, C. E., Ohtsuki, H., Antal, T., Fu, F., & Nowak, M. A. (2009) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.03.035 · Cited by 281
Self-citationCooperation and the Emergence of Role Differentiation in the Dynamics of Social Networks
Eguíluz, V. M., Zimmermann, M. G., Cela‐Conde, C. J., & Miguel, M. S. (2005) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/428716 · Cited by 270
Evolution of cooperation by generalized reciprocity
Pfeiffer, T., Rutte, C., Killingback, T., Taborsky, M., & Bonhoeffer, S. (2005) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2988 · Cited by 217
Self-citationEhrlich, P. R., & Levin, S. A. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030194 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Nowak, M. A., Bonhoeffer, S., & May, R. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1994-05-24
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4877-4881
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1999807601
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 18.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial games and the maintenance of cooperation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.91.11.4877
- The paper
- Nowak, M. A., Bonhoeffer, S., & May, R. M. (1994). Spatial games and the maintenance of cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.11.4877
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.