The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interactions between saturated acyl chains confer detergent resistance on lipids and glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins: GPI-anchored proteins in liposomes and cells show similar behavior.
Open accessAbstract
Proteins anchored by GPI are poorly solubilized from cell membranes by cold nonionic detergents because they associate with detergent-resistant membranes rich in cholesterol and sphingolipids. In this study, we demonstrated that cholesterol and sphingolipid-rich liposomes were incompletely solubilized by Triton X-100. GPI-anchored placental alkaline phosphatase incorporated in these liposomes was also not solubilized by cold Triton X-100. As sphingolipids have much higher melting temperatures (Tm) than cellular phospholipids, a property correlated with Tm might cause detergent inextractability. In support of this idea, we found that the low-Tm lipid dioleoyl phosphatidylcholine (DOPC) was efficiently extracted from detergent-resistant liposomes by Triton X-100, whereas the high-Tm lipid dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (DPPC) was not. The fluorescence polarization of liposome-incorporated diphenylhexatriene was measured to determine the "fluidity" of the detergent-resistant liposomes. We found that these liposomes were about as fluid as DPPC/cholesterol liposomes, which were present in the liquid-ordered phase, and much less fluid than DOPC or DOPC/cholesterol liposomes. These findings may explain the behavior of GPI-anchored proteins, which often have saturated fatty acyl chains and should prefer a less-fluid membrane. Therefore, we propose that acyl chain interactions can influence the association of GPI-anchored proteins with detergent-resistant membrane lipids. The affinity of GPI-anchored proteins for a sphingolipid-rich membrane phase that is not in the liquid crystalline state may be important in determining their cellular localization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Functional rafts in cell membranes
Simons, K., & Ikonen, E. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/42408 · Cited by 9,757
Lipid rafts and signal transduction
Simons, K., & Toomre, D. (2000) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/35036052 · Cited by 5,371
Lipid rafts as a membrane-organizing principle
Lingwood, D., & Simons, K. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1174621 · Cited by 4,417
The mystery of membrane organization: composition, regulation and roles of lipid rafts
Sezgin, E., Levental, I., Mayor, S., & Eggeling, C. (2017) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.16 · Cited by 2,124
Schneiter, R., Brügger, B., Sandhoff, R., Zellnig, G., Leber, A., Lampl, M., Athenstaedt, K., Hrastnik, C., Eder, S., Daum, G., et al. (1999) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.146.4.741 · Cited by 493
Montixi, C., Langlet, C., Bernard, A., Thimonier, J., Dubois, C., Wurbel, M., Chauvin, J., Pierres, M., & He, H. (1998) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/17.18.5334 · Cited by 460
Lipid rafts, cholesterol, and the brain
Korade, Z., & Kenworthy, A. K. (2008) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.02.019 · Cited by 342
Simons, M., Krämer, E.-M., Thiele, C., Stoffel, W., & Trotter, J. (2000) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.151.1.143 · Cited by 293
Liang, X., Nazarian, A., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Bornmann, W., Tempst, P., & Resh, M. D. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m104018200 · Cited by 227
Leventis, R., & Silvius, J. R. (2001) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(01)75873-0 · Cited by 206
Metadata
- Authors
- Schroeder, R., London, E., & Brown, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1994-12-06
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 12130-12134
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1974928798
- Cited by
- 691
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.