Cited by 357Cytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsNF-κB Signaling Pathways

Cooperative transcriptional activity of Jun and Stat3 beta, a short form of Stat3.

Open access
Schaefer, T S, Sanders, L K, Nathans, D·1995·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

To identify proteins that regulate the transcriptional activity of c-Jun, we have used the yeast two-hybrid screen to detect mammalian polypeptides that might interact functionally with the N-terminal segment of c-Jun, a known regulatory region. Among the proteins identified is a short form of Stat3 (designated Stat3 beta). Stat3 beta is missing the 55 C-terminal amino acid residues of the long form (Stat3 alpha) and has 7 additional amino acid residues at its C terminus. In the absence of added cytokines, expression of Stat3 beta (but not Stat3 alpha) in transfected cells activated a promoter containing the interleukin 6 responsive element of the rat alpha 2-macroglobulin gene; coexpression of Stat3 beta and c-Jun led to enhanced cooperative activation of the promoter. Nuclear extracts of cells transfected with a Stat3 beta expression plasmid formed a complex with an oligonucleotide containing a Stat3 binding site, whereas extracts of cells transfected with a Stat3 alpha plasmid did not. We conclude that there is a short form of Stat3 (Stat3 beta), that Stat3 beta is transcriptionally active under conditions where Stat3 alpha is not, and that Stat3 beta and c-Jun are capable of cooperative activation of certain promoters.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.92.20.9097

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Initial support for STAT3β acting as a dominant-negative regulator came with the repression and/or down-regulation of a number of recognized STAT3α target genes when STAT3β was overexpressed.

    “Initial support for this came with the repression and/or down-regulation of a number of recognized STAT3α target genes when STAT3β was overexpressed [10,48].”

    From Selective STAT3-α or -β expression reveals spliceform-specific phosphorylation kinetics, nuclear retention and distinct gene expression outcomes (2012) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Results report that overexpressed STAT3β stimulated the α2-macroglobulin–TK promoter; STAT3α, not STAT3β, slightly repressed reporter expression. The Discussion likewise describes STAT3β as activating this promoter, rather than acting as a dominant-negative regulator. Our copy does not report down-regulation of multiple STAT3α target genes by STAT3β. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Although STATs bind a similar DNA binding site, they may interact with co-activators or co-repressors to regulate different sets of their own downstream targets.

    “Although they bind to a similar DNA binding site, STATs may interact with co-activator or co-repressor to regulate different sets of their own downstream targets (5”

    From STAT3 Contributes to the Mitogenic Response of Hepatocytes during Liver Regeneration (2002) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Discussion (page not provided) reports cooperative activation of a promoter by Stat3β and c-Jun and suggests this could matter for responses involving other STAT proteins. It does not establish that STATs generally bind similar DNA sites or interact with co-repressors to regulate different sets of downstream targets. The similar-site discussion in the introduction concerns Jun and Fos proteins, not STATs. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [5]Fu, X.-Y., Kessler, D. S., Veals, S. A., Levy, D. E. & Darnell, J. E., Jr. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 8555–8559.
  2. [6]Żhong, Z., Wen, Z. & Darnell, J. E., Jr. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 4806–4810.
  3. [11]Ryder, K., Lau, L. F. & Nathans, D. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 1487–1491.
  4. [10]Nathans, D., Christy, B. A., Dubois, R., Lanahan, A., Sanders, L. K. & Nakabeppu, Y. (1991) in Origins of Human Cancer: A Comprehensive Review, eds. Brugge, J., Curran, T., Harlow, E. G., McCormick, F. (Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press, Plainview, NY), pp. 353–364.
  5. [12]Curran, T. & Vogt, P. K. (1992) in Transcriptional Regulation, eds. McKnight, S. L. & Yamamoto, K. R. (Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press, Plainview, NY), pp. 797–831.
  6. [14]Ryder, K., Lanahan, A., Perez-Albuerne, E. & Nathans, D. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 1500–1503.
  7. [23]Chevray, P. M. & Nathans, D. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 5789-5793.
  8. [29]Gorman, C. M., Merlino, G. T., Willingham, M. C., Pastan, I. & Howard, B. H. (1982) Proc. Natl. Acad. Šci. USA 79, 6777–6781.
  9. [34]Schindler, C., Fu, X.-Y., Improta, T., Aebersold, R. & Darnell, J. E., Jr. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 7836–7839.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schaefer, T. S., Sanders, L. K., & Nathans, D.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1995-09-26
Volume
92
Issue
20
Pages
9097-9101
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1974968368
Cited by
357
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
12.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › NF-κB Signaling Pathways
Keywords
c-Jun, short isoform, transcription factor interaction, STAT3 binding sites, promoter activation
MeSH terms
alpha-Macroglobulins, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, DNA-Binding Proteins, Mammals, Molecular Sequence Data, Oligodeoxyribonucleotides, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Recombinant Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Thymidine Kinase, Transcription, Genetic, Transfection, Chloramphenicol O-Acetyltransferase, Trans-Activators, Interleukin-6, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-jun, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos, Sequence Deletion, Transcription Factor AP-1, Two-Hybrid System Techniques, STAT3 Transcription Factor, Rats, Protein Multimerization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review