Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 387

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Defective propagation of signals generated by sympathetic nerve stimulation in the liver of connexin32-deficient mice.

Open access
Nelles, E, Bützler, C, Jung, D, Temme, A, Gabriel, H D, Dahl, U, Traub, O, Stümpel, F, Jungermann, K, Zielasek, J, Toyka, K V, Dermietzel, R, Willecke, K·1996·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The gap junctional protein connexin32 is expressed in hepatocytes, exocrine pancreatic cells, Schwann cells, and other cell types. We have inactivated the connexin32 gene by homologous recombination in the mouse genome and have generated homozygous connexin32-deficient mice that were viable and fertile but weighed on the average approximately 17% less than wild-type controls. Electrical stimulation of sympathetic nerves in connexin32-deficient liver triggered a 78% lower amount of glucose mobilization from glycogen stores, when compared with wild-type liver. Thus, connexin32-containing gap junctions are essential in mouse liver for maximal intercellular propagation of the noradrenaline signal from the periportal (upstream) area, where it is received from sympathetic nerve endings, to perivenous (downstream) hepatocytes. In connexin32-defective liver, the amount of connexin26 protein expressed was found to be lower than in wild-type liver, and the total area of gap junction plaques was approximately 1000-fold smaller than in wild-type liver. In contrast to patients with connexin32 defects suffering from X chromosome-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMTX) due to demyelination in Schwann cells of peripheral nerves, connexin32-deficient mice did not show neurological abnormalities when analyzed at 3 months of age. It is possible, however, that they may develop neurodegenerative symptoms at older age.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.93.18.9565

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 387

Metadata

Authors
Nelles, E., Bützler, C., Jung, D., Temme, A., Gabriel, H. D., Dahl, U., Traub, O., Stümpel, F., Jungermann, K., Zielasek, J., Toyka, K. V., Dermietzel, R., & Willecke, K.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1996-09-03
Volume
93
Issue
18
Pages
9565-9570
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2014105239
Cited by
387
References
1
FWCI
9.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defective propagation of signals generated by sympathetic nerve stimulation in the liver of connexin32-deficient mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.93.18.9565
The paper
Nelles, E., Bützler, C., Jung, D., Temme, A., Gabriel, H. D., Dahl, U., Traub, O., Stümpel, F., Jungermann, K., Zielasek, J., Toyka, K. V., Dermietzel, R., & Willecke, K. (1996). Defective propagation of signals generated by sympathetic nerve stimulation in the liver of connexin32-deficient mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.18.9565

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.