The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A thymidine triphosphate shape analog lacking Watson–Crick pairing ability is replicated with high sequence selectivity
Open accessAbstract
Compound 1 (F), a nonpolar nucleoside analog that is isosteric with thymidine, has been proposed as a probe for the importance of hydrogen bonds in biological systems. Consistent with its lack of strong H-bond donors or acceptors, F is shown here by thermal denaturation studies to pair very poorly and with no significant selectivity among natural bases in DNA oligonucleotides. We report the synthesis of the 5′-triphosphate derivative of 1 and the study of its ability to be inserted into replicating DNA strands by the Klenow fragment (KF, exo − mutant) of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I. We find that this nucleotide derivative (dFTP) is a surprisingly good substrate for KF; steady-state measurements indicate it is inserted into a template opposite adenine with efficiency ( V max / K m ) only 40-fold lower than dTTP. Moreover, it is inserted opposite A (relative to C, G, or T) with selectivity nearly as high as that observed for dTTP. Elongation of the strand past F in an F–A pair is associated with a brief pause, whereas that beyond A in the inverted A–F pair is not. Combined with data from studies with F in the template strand, the results show that KF can efficiently replicate a base pair (A–F/F–A) that is inherently very unstable, and the replication occurs with very high fidelity despite a lack of inherent base-pairing selectivity. The results suggest that hydrogen bonds may be less important in the fidelity of replication than commonly believed and that nucleotide/template shape complementarity may play a more important role than previously believed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Insertion of specific bases during DNA synthesis past the oxidation-damaged base 8-oxodG
Shibutani, S., Takeshita, M., & Grollman, A. P. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/349431a0 · Cited by 2,224
How good is fluorine as a hydrogen bond acceptor?
Howard, J. A. K., Hoy, V. J., O'Hagan, D., & Smith, G. T. (1996) · Tetrahedron · doi:10.1016/0040-4020(96)00749-1 · Cited by 737
FIDELITY MECHANISMS IN DNA REPLICATION
Echols, H., & Goodman, M. F. (1991) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.60.070191.002401 · Cited by 712
Loeb, L. A., & Kunkel, T. A. (1982) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.51.070182.002241 · Cited by 511
Biochemical Basis of DNA Replication Fidelity
Goodman, M. F., Creighton, S., Bloom, L. B., Petruska, J., & Kunkel, T. A. (1993) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.3109/10409239309086792 · Cited by 446
Conversion of Mono- and Oligodeoxyribonucleotides to 5'-Triphosphates1
Hoard, D. E., & Ott, D. G. (1965) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01086a031 · Cited by 434
Takeshita, M., Chang, C. N., Johnson, F., Will, S., & Grollman, A. P. (1987) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)61093-2 · Cited by 400
Kinetic mechanism of DNA polymerase I (Klenow)
Kuchta, R. D., Mizrahi, V., Benkovic, P. A., Johnson, K. A., & Benkovic, S. J. (1987) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00399a057 · Cited by 350
DNA polymerase insertion fidelity. Gel assay for site-specific kinetics.
Boosalis, M. S., Petruska, J., & Goodman, M. F. (1987) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)47850-7 · Cited by 332
Sagher, D., & Strauss, B. (1983) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00288a026 · Cited by 320
Cited by
Kunkel, T. A., & Bebenek, K. (2000) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.69.1.497 · Cited by 1,003
C-Nucleosides: Synthetic Strategies and Biological Applications
Hocek, M. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9002165 · Cited by 383
Active Site Tightness and Substrate Fit in DNA Replication
Kool, E. T. (2002) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.110601.135453 · Cited by 350
Self-citationRecent progress in non-native nucleic acid modifications
McKenzie, L. K., El-Khoury, R., Thorpe, J. D., Damha, M. J., & Hollenstein, M. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs01430c · Cited by 300
Determinants of Mutation Rate Variation in the Human Germline
Ségurel, L., Wyman, M. J., & Przeworski, M. (2014) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-031714-125740 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Moran, S., Ren, R. X.-F., & Kool, E. T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1997-09-30
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 10506-10511
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2081653306
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 7.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A thymidine triphosphate shape analog lacking Watson–Crick pairing ability is replicated with high sequence selectivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.94.20.10506
- The paper
- Moran, S., Ren, R. X.-F., & Kool, E. T. (1997). A thymidine triphosphate shape analog lacking Watson–Crick pairing ability is replicated with high sequence selectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.20.10506
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.