Recognition of nonhybridizing base pairs during nucleotide excision repair of DNA
Open accessAbstract
Nondistorting C4′ backbone adducts serve as molecular tools to analyze the strategy by which a limited number of human nucleotide excision repair (NER) factors recognize an infinite variety of DNA lesions. We have constructed composite DNA substrates containing a noncomplementary site adjacent to a nondistorting C4′ adduct to show that the loss of hydrogen bonding contacts between partner strands is an essential signal for the recruitment of NER enzymes. This specific conformational requirement for excision is mediated by the affinity of xeroderma pigmentosum group A (XPA) protein for nonhybridizing sites in duplex DNA. XPA recognizes defective Watson–Crick base pair conformations even in the absence of DNA adducts or other covalent modifications, apparently through detection of hydrophobic base components that are abnormally exposed to the double helical surface. This recognition function of XPA is enhanced by replication protein A (RPA) such that, in combination, XPA and RPA constitute a potent molecular sensor of denatured base pairs. Our results indicate that the XPA–RPA complex may promote damage recognition by monitoring Watson–Crick base pair integrity, thereby recruiting the human NER system preferentially to sites where hybridization between complementary strands is weakened or entirely disrupted.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
G4s and non-B DNA structures in general have been shown to trigger genomic instability through wrongfully stimulating DNA damage and repair responses which initially maintain genome integrity.
“Notably, G4s and non-B DNA structures in general have been shown to trigger genomic instability through wrongfully stimulating DNA damage and repair responses which initially maintain genome integrity.”
From G-quadruplex-mediated genomic instability drives SNVs in cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [81]
The Results (page not available in our copy) show that nonhybridizing bases stimulate nucleotide excision repair when paired with a C4′ adduct, supporting the narrower point that altered base pairing can recruit a repair response. The paper does not examine G4s or non-B DNA structures generally, or show that inappropriate repair of those structures causes genomic instability; it reports that mismatched bases alone caused no excision. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Reconstitution of Human DNA Repair Excision Nuclease in a Highly Defined System
Mu, D., Park, C.-H., Matsunaga, T., Hsu, D. S., Reardon, J. T., & Sancar, A. (1995) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.270.6.2415 · Cited by 476 · see citing works
RPA involvement in the damage-recognition and incision steps of nucleotide excision repair
He, Z., Henricksen, L. A., Wold, M. S., & Ingles, C. J. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/374566a0 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Preferential binding of the xeroderma pigmentosum group A complementing protein to damaged DNA
Jones, C. J., & Wood, R. D. (1993) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00096a021 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- [1]Friedberg E C, Walker G C, Siede W. DNA Repair and Mutagenesis. Washington, DC: Am. Soc. Microbiol.; 1995. pp. 634–649. [Google Scholar]
- [2]Hoeijmakers J H J. Eur J Cancer. 1994;30:1912–1921. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(94)00381-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [3]Hanawalt P C. Science. 1994;266:1957–1958. doi: 10.1126/science.7801121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [4]Sancar A. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:43–81. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.000355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- [5]Wood R D. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:135–167. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.001031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [6]Huang J-C, Hsu D S, Kazantsev A, Sancar A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:12213–12217. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.25.12213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [7]Reardon J T, Bessho T, Kung H C, Bolton P H, Sancar A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:9463–9468. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.17.9463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- [9]Aboussekhra A, Biggerstaff M, Shivji M K K, Vilpo J A, Moncollin V, Podust V N, Protic M, Hübscher U, Egly J-M, Wood R D. Cell. 1995;80:859–868. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90289-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- [10]Gunz D, Hess M T, Naegeli H. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:25089–25098. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.41.25089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [11]Svoboda D L, Taylor J-S, Hearst J E, Sancar A. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:1931–1936. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12]Hess M T, Gunz D, Luneva N, Geacintov N E, Naegeli H. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17:7069–7076. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.12.7069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [13]Hess M T, Naegeli H, Capobianco M. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:27867–27872. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.43.27867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [14]Mu D, Tursun M, Duckett D R, Drummond J T, Modrich P, Sancar A. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17:760–769. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.2.760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [15]Moggs J G, Szymkowski D E, Yamada M, Karran P, Wood R D. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:480–490. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.3.480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [16]Hess M T, Schwitter U, Petretta M, Giese B, Naegeli H. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:6664–6669. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.13.6664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- [17]Matsunaga T, Mu M, Park C-H, Reardon J T, Sancar A. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:20862–20869. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.35.20862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [19]Henricksen L A, Umbricht C B, Wold M S. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:11121–11132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20]Sibghat-Ullah, Husain I, Carlton W, Sancar A. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17:4471–4484. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.12.4471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [21]Wood R D, Robins P, Lindahl T. Cell. 1988;53:97–106. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90491-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [22]Huang J-C, Svoboda D, Reardon J T, Sancar A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:3664–3668. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.8.3664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [23]Cleaver J E, States J C. Biochem J. 1997;328:1–12. doi: 10.1042/bj3280001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [24]Li L, Elledge S J, Peterson C A, Bales E S, Legerski R J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:5012–5016. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.11.5012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [25]Park C-H, Sancar A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:5017–5021. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.11.5017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- [26]Loakes D, Brown D M, Linde S, Hill F. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995;23:2361–2366. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.13.2361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [27]Coverley D, Kenny M, Munn M, Rupp W D, Lane D P, Wood R D. Nature (London) 1991;349:538–541. doi: 10.1038/349538a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [28]Kim C, Paulus B F, Wold M S. Biochemistry. 1994;33:14197–14206. doi: 10.1021/bi00251a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [29]Matsunaga T, Park C-H, Bessho T, Mu D, Sancar A. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:11047–11050. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.19.11047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [31]Li L, Lu X, Peterson C A, Legerski R J. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15:5396–5402. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.10.5396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [32]Wold M S. Annu Rev Biochem. 1997;66:61–92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [33]Reardon J T, Mu D, Sancar A. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:19451–19456. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.32.19451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- [34]Ahn B, Grossman L. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:21462–21470. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.35.21462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [35]Hunter W N, Brown T, Anand N N, Kennard O. Nature (London) 1986;320:552–555. doi: 10.1038/320552a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [36]Verri A, Mazzarello P, Spadari S, Focher F. Biochem J. 1992;287:1007–1010. doi: 10.1042/bj2871007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [37]Klimasauskas S, Roberts R J. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995;23:1388–1395. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.8.1388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [38]Zhao X, Liu J, Hsu D S, Zhao S, Taylor J-S, Sancar A. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:32580–32590. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.51.32580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [39]Jing Y, Kao J F-L, Taylor J-S. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;26:3845–3853. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.16.3845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [40]Sugasawa K, Ng J M, Masutani C, Iwai S, van der Spek P J, Eker A P, Hanaoka F, Bootsma D, Hoeijmakers J H. Mol Cell. 1998;2:223–232. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80132-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer
Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35077232 · Cited by 3,939 · see citing works
Nucleotide excision repair and human syndromes
de Boer, J., & Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. (2000) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/21.3.453 · Cited by 674 · see citing works
Molecular Mechanisms of Mammalian Global Genome Nucleotide Excision Repair
Gillet, L. C. J., & Schärer, O. D. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040483f · Cited by 642 · see citing works
A multistep damage recognition mechanism for global genomic nucleotide excision repair
Sugasawa, K., Okamoto, T., Shimizu, Y., Masutani, C., Iwai, S., & Hanaoka, F. (2001) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.866301 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Sugasawa, K., Akagi, J.-I., Nishi, R., Iwai, S., & Hanaoka, F. (2009) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.035 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Dynamic alternative DNA structures in biology and disease
Wang, G., & Vasquez, K. M. (2023) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-022-00539-9 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Nucleotide excision repair and cancer
Leibeling, D., Laspe, P., & Emmert, S. (2006) · Journal of Molecular Histology · doi:10.1007/s10735-006-9041-x · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Critical DNA damage recognition functions of XPC‐hHR23B and XPA‐RPA in nucleotide excision repair
Thoma, B. S., & Vasquez, K. M. (2003) · Molecular Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1002/mc.10143 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Xeroderma pigmentosum genes: Functions inside and outside DNA repair
Sugasawa, K. (2007) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgm282 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
G-quadruplex-mediated genomic instability drives SNVs in cancer
Richl, T., Kuper, J., & Kisker, C. (2024) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkae098 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Buschta-Hedayat, N., Buterin, T., Hess, M. T., Missura, M., & Naegeli, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-05-25
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 6090-6095
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC26840
- OpenAlex
- W1994982452
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Diffusion and Search Dynamics
- Keywords
- nucleotide excision repair, XPA, replication protein A, DNA damage recognition, hydrogen bonding, DNA conformation, xeroderma pigmentosum
- MeSH terms
- Base Sequence, Binding Sites, DNA, DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, HeLa Cells, Humans, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Nucleic Acid Denaturation, Oligodeoxyribonucleotides, Substrate Specificity, Xeroderma Pigmentosum, Base Pairing, Replication Protein A, Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group A Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review