Cited by 103DNA Repair MechanismsDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryDiffusion and Search Dynamics

Recognition of nonhybridizing base pairs during nucleotide excision repair of DNA

Open access
Buschta-Hedayat, Neda, Buterin, Tonko, Hess, Martin T., Missura, Miriam, Naegeli, Hanspeter·1999·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Nondistorting C4′ backbone adducts serve as molecular tools to analyze the strategy by which a limited number of human nucleotide excision repair (NER) factors recognize an infinite variety of DNA lesions. We have constructed composite DNA substrates containing a noncomplementary site adjacent to a nondistorting C4′ adduct to show that the loss of hydrogen bonding contacts between partner strands is an essential signal for the recruitment of NER enzymes. This specific conformational requirement for excision is mediated by the affinity of xeroderma pigmentosum group A (XPA) protein for nonhybridizing sites in duplex DNA. XPA recognizes defective Watson–Crick base pair conformations even in the absence of DNA adducts or other covalent modifications, apparently through detection of hydrophobic base components that are abnormally exposed to the double helical surface. This recognition function of XPA is enhanced by replication protein A (RPA) such that, in combination, XPA and RPA constitute a potent molecular sensor of denatured base pairs. Our results indicate that the XPA–RPA complex may promote damage recognition by monitoring Watson–Crick base pair integrity, thereby recruiting the human NER system preferentially to sites where hybridization between complementary strands is weakened or entirely disrupted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6090

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • G4s and non-B DNA structures in general have been shown to trigger genomic instability through wrongfully stimulating DNA damage and repair responses which initially maintain genome integrity.

    “Notably, G4s and non-B DNA structures in general have been shown to trigger genomic instability through wrongfully stimulating DNA damage and repair responses which initially maintain genome integrity.”

    From G-quadruplex-mediated genomic instability drives SNVs in cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [81]

    The Results (page not available in our copy) show that nonhybridizing bases stimulate nucleotide excision repair when paired with a C4′ adduct, supporting the narrower point that altered base pairing can recruit a repair response. The paper does not examine G4s or non-B DNA structures generally, or show that inappropriate repair of those structures causes genomic instability; it reports that mismatched bases alone caused no excision. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. [1]Friedberg E C, Walker G C, Siede W. DNA Repair and Mutagenesis. Washington, DC: Am. Soc. Microbiol.; 1995. pp. 634–649. [Google Scholar]
  2. [2]Hoeijmakers J H J. Eur J Cancer. 1994;30:1912–1921. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(94)00381-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  3. [3]Hanawalt P C. Science. 1994;266:1957–1958. doi: 10.1126/science.7801121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  4. [4]Sancar A. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:43–81. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.000355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  5. [5]Wood R D. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:135–167. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.001031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  6. [6]Huang J-C, Hsu D S, Kazantsev A, Sancar A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:12213–12217. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.25.12213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  7. [7]Reardon J T, Bessho T, Kung H C, Bolton P H, Sancar A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:9463–9468. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.17.9463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  8. [9]Aboussekhra A, Biggerstaff M, Shivji M K K, Vilpo J A, Moncollin V, Podust V N, Protic M, Hübscher U, Egly J-M, Wood R D. Cell. 1995;80:859–868. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90289-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  9. [10]Gunz D, Hess M T, Naegeli H. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:25089–25098. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.41.25089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  10. [11]Svoboda D L, Taylor J-S, Hearst J E, Sancar A. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:1931–1936. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. [12]Hess M T, Gunz D, Luneva N, Geacintov N E, Naegeli H. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17:7069–7076. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.12.7069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  12. [13]Hess M T, Naegeli H, Capobianco M. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:27867–27872. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.43.27867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  13. [14]Mu D, Tursun M, Duckett D R, Drummond J T, Modrich P, Sancar A. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17:760–769. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.2.760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  14. [15]Moggs J G, Szymkowski D E, Yamada M, Karran P, Wood R D. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:480–490. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.3.480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  15. [16]Hess M T, Schwitter U, Petretta M, Giese B, Naegeli H. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:6664–6669. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.13.6664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  16. [17]Matsunaga T, Mu M, Park C-H, Reardon J T, Sancar A. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:20862–20869. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.35.20862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  17. [19]Henricksen L A, Umbricht C B, Wold M S. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:11121–11132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. [20]Sibghat-Ullah, Husain I, Carlton W, Sancar A. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17:4471–4484. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.12.4471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  19. [21]Wood R D, Robins P, Lindahl T. Cell. 1988;53:97–106. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90491-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  20. [22]Huang J-C, Svoboda D, Reardon J T, Sancar A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:3664–3668. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.8.3664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  21. [23]Cleaver J E, States J C. Biochem J. 1997;328:1–12. doi: 10.1042/bj3280001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  22. [24]Li L, Elledge S J, Peterson C A, Bales E S, Legerski R J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:5012–5016. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.11.5012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  23. [25]Park C-H, Sancar A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:5017–5021. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.11.5017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  24. [26]Loakes D, Brown D M, Linde S, Hill F. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995;23:2361–2366. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.13.2361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  25. [27]Coverley D, Kenny M, Munn M, Rupp W D, Lane D P, Wood R D. Nature (London) 1991;349:538–541. doi: 10.1038/349538a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  26. [28]Kim C, Paulus B F, Wold M S. Biochemistry. 1994;33:14197–14206. doi: 10.1021/bi00251a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  27. [29]Matsunaga T, Park C-H, Bessho T, Mu D, Sancar A. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:11047–11050. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.19.11047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  28. [31]Li L, Lu X, Peterson C A, Legerski R J. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15:5396–5402. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.10.5396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  29. [32]Wold M S. Annu Rev Biochem. 1997;66:61–92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  30. [33]Reardon J T, Mu D, Sancar A. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:19451–19456. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.32.19451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  31. [34]Ahn B, Grossman L. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:21462–21470. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.35.21462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  32. [35]Hunter W N, Brown T, Anand N N, Kennard O. Nature (London) 1986;320:552–555. doi: 10.1038/320552a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  33. [36]Verri A, Mazzarello P, Spadari S, Focher F. Biochem J. 1992;287:1007–1010. doi: 10.1042/bj2871007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  34. [37]Klimasauskas S, Roberts R J. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995;23:1388–1395. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.8.1388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  35. [38]Zhao X, Liu J, Hsu D S, Zhao S, Taylor J-S, Sancar A. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:32580–32590. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.51.32580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  36. [39]Jing Y, Kao J F-L, Taylor J-S. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;26:3845–3853. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.16.3845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  37. [40]Sugasawa K, Ng J M, Masutani C, Iwai S, van der Spek P J, Eker A P, Hanaoka F, Bootsma D, Hoeijmakers J H. Mol Cell. 1998;2:223–232. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80132-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buschta-Hedayat, N., Buterin, T., Hess, M. T., Missura, M., & Naegeli, H.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1999-05-25
Volume
96
Issue
11
Pages
6090-6095
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1994982452
Cited by
103
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Diffusion and Search Dynamics
Keywords
nucleotide excision repair, XPA, replication protein A, DNA damage recognition, hydrogen bonding, DNA conformation, xeroderma pigmentosum
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Binding Sites, DNA, DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, HeLa Cells, Humans, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Nucleic Acid Denaturation, Oligodeoxyribonucleotides, Substrate Specificity, Xeroderma Pigmentosum, Base Pairing, Replication Protein A, Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group A Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review