The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modulation of type M 2 pyruvate kinase activity by the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein
Abstract
We report here that the E7 oncoprotein encoded by the oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 binds to the glycolytic enzyme type M 2 pyruvate kinase (M2-PK). M2-PK occurs in a tetrameric form with a high affinity to its substrate phosphoenolpyruvate and a dimeric form with a low affinity to phosphoenolpyruvate, and the transition between both conformations regulates the glycolytic flux in tumor cells. The glycolytic intermediate fructose 1,6-bisphosphate induces the reassociation of the dimeric to the tetrameric form of M2-PK. The expression of E7 in an experimental cell line shifts the equilibrium to the dimeric state despite a significant increase in the fructose 1,6-bisphosphate levels. Investigations of HPV-16 E7 mutants and the nononcogenic HPV-11 subtype suggest that the interaction of HPV-16 E7 with M2-PK may be linked to the transforming potential of the viral oncoprotein.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“expression of E7 shifts this equilibrium to the dimeric state, although there is a significant increase in FEP levels in E7-expressing cells, thus leading to aerobic glycolysis these cells [304]”
From The Not-So-Good, the Bad and the Ugly: HPV E5, E6 and E7 Oncoproteins in the Orchestration of Carcinogenesis (2021) · cites this paper as [304]
In the citing paper
“Using mammalian cells expressing HPV-16 E7, Zwerschke et al. showed that E7 expression increases the intracellular concentrations of phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) and fructose 1,6-bisphosphate (FEP) metabolites, upstream of the glycolytic enzyme type M2 (M2-PK).”
From The Not-So-Good, the Bad and the Ugly: HPV E5, E6 and E7 Oncoproteins in the Orchestration of Carcinogenesis (2021) · cites this paper as [304]
Citations
Cites
Ashizawa, K., Willingham, M. C., Liang, C. M., & Cheng, S. Y. (1991) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)55378-3 · Cited by 172
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- 10.1038/371342a0 · DOI
- 10.1006/bbrc.1997.6253 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1022490512705 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.273.17.10609 · DOI
- O Kaplan, G Navon, R C Lyon, P J Faustino, E J Straka, J S Cohen Cancer Res 50, 544–551 (1990).
- 10.1023/A:1022494613613 · DOI
- 10.1042/bj2650503 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.272.8.4941 · DOI
- E Eigenbrodt, M Reinacher, U Scheefers-Borchel, H Scheefers, R Friis Crit Rev Oncog 3, 91–115 (1992).
- 10.1016/0167-4889(94)90270-4 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcp.1041530315 · DOI
- 10.1016/0042-6822(91)90816-T · DOI
- 10.1128/jvi.63.10.4417-4421.1989 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90570-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/jvi.66.3.1329-1335.1992 · DOI
- 10.1016/0168-9525(96)81455-7 · DOI
- W Zwerschke, S Joswig, P Jansen-Dürr Oncogene 12, 213–220 (1996).
- 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90498-F · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/20.6.1425 · DOI
- , eds F M Ausubel, R Kingston, D Moore, J Seidman, J Smith, K Struhl (Wiley, New York Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, 1988).
- K Zerfass-Thome, W Zwerschke, B Mannhardt, R Tindle, J Botz, P Jansen-Dürr Oncogene 13, 2323–2330 (1996).
- 10.1128/jvi.67.5.2521-2528.1993 · DOI
- 10.1099/0022-1317-78-10-2607 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03405.x · DOI
- 10.1128/jvi.69.10.6389-6399.1995 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199605)167:2<238::AID-JCP7>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)89705-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/0167-4838(92)90337-D · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-9861(76)90555-5 · DOI
- 10.1093/carcin/19.1.99 · DOI
- E Eigenbrodt, D Basenau, S Holthusen, S Mazurek, G Fischer Anticancer Res 17, 3153–3156 (1997).
- 10.1128/jvi.61.5.1686-1689.1987 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0042-6822(89)90386-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0042-6822(91)90613-G · DOI
- 10.1159/000217735 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-564499-0.50014-6 · DOI
- 10.1002/bit.260400810 · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.330 · DOI
- C Y Kim, M H Tsai, C Osmanian, T G Graeber, J E Lee, R G Giffard, J A DiPaolo, D M Peehl, A J Giaccia Cancer Res 57, 4200–4204 (1997).
- 10.1096/fasebj.11.5.9141507 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)47278-X · DOI
- 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90515-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1042/bj3190229 · DOI
Cited by
Regulation of cancer cell metabolism
Cairns, R. A., Harris, I. S., & Mak, T. W. (2011) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2981 · Cited by 4,744
Metabolic Reprogramming: A Cancer Hallmark Even Warburg Did Not Anticipate
Ward, P. S., & Thompson, C. B. (2012) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.014 · Cited by 3,233
Pyruvate kinase M2 is a phosphotyrosine-binding protein
Christofk, H. R., Vander Heiden, M. G., Wu, N., Asara, J. M., & Cantley, L. C. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06667 · Cited by 995
Pyruvate kinase type M2 and its role in tumor growth and spreading
Mazurek, S., Boschek, C. B., Hugo, F., & Eigenbrodt, E. (2005) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2005.04.009 · Cited by 812
Self-citationPyruvate Kinase M2 Regulates Gene Transcription by Acting as a Protein Kinase
Gao, X., Wang, H., Yang, J. J., Liu, X., & Liu, Z.-R. (2012) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.001 · Cited by 772
Pyruvate kinase type M2: A key regulator of the metabolic budget system in tumor cells
Mazurek, S. (2011) · The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2010.02.005 · Cited by 694
Self-citationNarisawa‐Saito, M., & Kiyono, T. (2007) · Cancer Science · doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00546.x · Cited by 528
Diaz-Ruiz, R., Rigoulet, M., & Devin, A. (2011) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics · doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.08.010 · Cited by 486
Fan, T., Sun, G., Sun, X., Zhao, L., Zhong, R., & Peng, Y. (2019) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers11030317 · Cited by 171
Basukala, O., & Banks, L. (2021) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v13101892 · Cited by 137
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zwerschke, W., Mazurek, S., Massimi, P., Banks, L., Eigenbrodt, E., & Jansen-Dürr, P.
- Affiliations
- Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Forschungsschwerpunkt Angewandte Tumorvirologie, Abt. F0301, INF 242, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany; ScheBo Tech GmbH, Bahnhofstrasse 6, D-35435 Wettenberg, Germany; Institut für Biochemie and Endokrinologie, Fachbereich Veterinärmedizin, Universität Giessen, Frankfurter Strasse 100, D-35392 Giessen, Germany; and International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Padriciano 99, Trieste, Italy
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-02-16
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1291-1296
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review