Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Human monoclonal antibodies reactive to oligodendrocytes promote remyelination in a model of multiple sclerosis

Open access
Warrington, Arthur E., Asakura, Kunihiko, Bieber, Allan J., Ciric, Bogoljub, Van Keulen, Virginia, Kaveri, Srini V., Kyle, Robert A., Pease, Larry R., Rodriguez, Moses·2000·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Promoting remyelination, a major goal of an effective treatment for demyelinating diseases, has the potential to protect vulnerable axons, increase conduction velocity, and improve neurologic deficits. Strategies to promote remyelination have focused on transplanting oligodendrocytes (OLs) or recruiting endogenous myelinating cells with trophic factors. Ig-based therapies, routinely used to treat a variety of neurological and autoimmune diseases, underlie our approach to enhance remyelination. We isolated two human mAbs directed against OL surface antigens that promoted significant remyelination in a virus-mediated model of multiple sclerosis. Four additional OL-binding human mAbs did not promote remyelination. Both human mAbs were as effective as human i.v. Ig, a treatment shown to have efficacy in multiple sclerosis, and bound to the surface of human OLs suggesting a direct effect of the mAbs on the cells responsible for myelination. Alternatively, targeting human mAbs to areas of central nervous system (CNS) pathology may facilitate the opsonization of myelin debris, allowing repair to proceed. Human mAbs were isolated from the sera of individuals with a form of monoclonal gammopathy. These individuals carry a high level of monoclonal protein in their blood without detriment, lending support to the belief that administration of these mAbs as a therapy would be safe. Our results are ( i ) consistent with the hypothesis that CNS-reactive mAbs, part of the normal Ig repertoire in humans, may help repair and protect the CNS from pathogenic immune injury, and ( ii ) further challenge the premise that Abs that bind OLs are necessarily pathogenic.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.97.12.6820

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Cited by

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
Warrington, A. E., Asakura, K., Bieber, A. J., Ciric, B., Van Keulen, V., Kaveri, S. V., Kyle, R. A., Pease, L. R., & Rodriguez, M.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2000-06-06
Volume
97
Issue
12
Pages
6820-6825
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1998253454
Cited by
254
References
45
FWCI
10.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human monoclonal antibodies reactive to oligodendrocytes promote remyelination in a model of multiple sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.97.12.6820
The paper
Warrington, A. E., Asakura, K., Bieber, A. J., Ciric, B., Van Keulen, V., Kaveri, S. V., Kyle, R. A., Pease, L. R., & Rodriguez, M. (2000). Human monoclonal antibodies reactive to oligodendrocytes promote remyelination in a model of multiple sclerosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.12.6820

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.