Cited by 118Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsProtein Structure and DynamicsLipid Membrane Structure and Behavior

Self-association of human apolipoprotein E3 and E4 in the presence and absence of phospholipid

Open access
Perugini, Matthew A., Schuck, Peter, Howlett, Geoffrey J.·2000·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Human apolipoprotein E (apoE) exists as three main isoforms, differing by single amino acid substitutions, with the apoE4 isoform strongly linked to the incidence of late onset Alzheimer's disease. We have expressed and purified apoE3 and apoE4 from Escherichia coli and compared their hydrodynamic properties by gel permeation liquid chromatography, capillary electrophoresis, circular dichroism, and sedimentation methods. Sedimentation velocity experiments, employing a new method for determining the size distribution of polydisperse macromolecules in solution (Schuck, P. (2000) Biophys. J. 78, 1606-1619), provide direct evidence for the heterogeneous solution structures of apoE3 and apoE4. In a lipid-free environment, apoE3 and apoE4 exist as a slow equilibrium mixture of monomer, tetramer, octamer, and a small proportion of higher oligomers. Both sedimentation velocity and equilibrium experiments indicate that apoE4 has a greater propensity to self-associate. We also demonstrate that apoE3 and apoE4 oligomers dissociate significantly in the presence of dihexanoylphosphatidylcholine micelles (20 mm) and to a lesser extent at submicellar concentrations (4 mm). The alpha-helical content for both isoforms was almost identical (50%) in the presence and absence of dihexanoylphosphatidylcholine. These results reveal that apoE oligomers undergo phospholipid-induced dissociation to folded monomers, suggesting the monomeric form prevails on the lipoprotein surface in vivo.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m005565200

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [1]1. Shore, V.G. ∙ Shore, B. Biochemistry. 1973; 12:502-507 Crossref Scopus (245) PubMed Google Scholar
  2. [2]2. Eisenberg, S. J. Lipid Res. 1984; 25:1017-1058 Full Text (PDF) PubMed Google Scholar
  3. [3]3. Mahley, R.W. Science. 1988; 240:622-630 Crossref Scopus (3592) PubMed Google Scholar
  4. [4]4. Weisgraber, K.H. Adv. Protein Chem. 1994; 45:249-302 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  5. [5]5. Weisgraber, K.H. ∙ Rall, Jr., S.C. ∙ Mahley, R.W. J. Biol. Chem. 1981; 256:9077-9083 Full Text (PDF) PubMed Google Scholar
  6. [6]6. Rall, Jr., S.C. ∙ Weisgraber, K.H. ∙ Mahley, R.W. J. Biol. Chem. 1982; 257:4171-4178 Full Text (PDF) PubMed Google Scholar
  7. [7]7. Zannis, V.I. ∙ Breslow, J.L. ∙ Utermann, G. ... J. Lipid Res. 1982; 23:911-914 Full Text (PDF) PubMed Google Scholar
  8. [8]8. Utermann, G. ∙ Jaeschke, M. ∙ Menzel, J. FEBS Lett. 1975; 56:352-355 Crossref Scopus (203) PubMed Google Scholar
  9. [9]9. Corder, E.H. ∙ Saunders, A.M. ∙ Strittmatter, W.J. ... Science. 1993; 261:921-923 Crossref Scopus (7510) PubMed Google Scholar
  10. [10]10. Wetterau, J.R. ∙ Aggerbeck, L.P. ∙ Rall, Jr., S.C. ... J. Biol. Chem. 1988; 263:6240-6248

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perugini, M. A., Schuck, P., & Howlett, G. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Howlett, Geoffrey J.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-11
Volume
275
Issue
47
Pages
36758-36765
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076775566
Cited by
118
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
Keywords
apolipoprotein E, APOE3, APOE ε4, self-association, oligomerization, solution structure, alpha-helical content, Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Apolipoproteins E, Chromatography, Gel, Circular Dichroism, Humans, Micelles, Phospholipid Ethers, Phospholipids, Protein Conformation, Electrophoresis, Capillary, Apolipoprotein E3, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review