Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 231

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Determination of the Upper Size Limit for Uptake and Processing of Ligands by the Asialoglycoprotein Receptor on Hepatocytesin Vitro and in Vivo

Open access
Rensen, Patrick C.N., Sliedregt, Leo A.J.M., Ferns, Michiel, Kieviet, Erwin, van Rossenberg, Sabine M.W., van Leeuwen, Steven H., van Berkel, Theo J.C., Biessen, Erik A.L.·2001·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPr) on hepatocytes plays a role in the clearance of desialylated proteins from the serum. Although its sugar preference (N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) >> galactose) and the effects of ligand valency (tetraantennary > triantennary >> diantennary >> monoantennary) and sugar spacing (20 A 10 A 4 A) are well documented, the effect of particle size on recognition and uptake of ligands by the receptor is poorly defined. In the present study, we assessed the maximum ligand size that still allows effective processing by the ASGPr of mouse hepatocytes in vivo and in vitro. Here too, we synthesized a novel glycolipid, which possesses a highly hydrophobic steroid moiety for stable incorporation into liposomes, and a triantennary GalNAc(3)-terminated cluster glycoside with a high nanomolar affinity (2 nm) for the ASGPr. Incorporation of the glycolipid into small (30 nm) [(3)H]cholesteryl oleate-labeled long circulating liposomes (1-50%, w/w) caused a concentration-dependent increase in particle clearance that was liver-specific (reaching 85 +/- 7% of the injected dose at 30 min after injection) and mediated by the ASGPr on hepatocytes, as shown by competition studies with asialoorosomucoid in vivo. By using glycolipid-laden liposomes of various sizes between 30 and 90 nm, it was demonstrated that particles with a diameter of >70 nm could no longer be recognized and processed by the ASGPr in vivo. This threshold size for effective uptake was not related to the physical barrier raised by the fenestrated sinusoidal endothelium, which shields hepatocytes from the circulation, because similar results were obtained by studying the uptake of liposomes on isolated mouse hepatocytes in vitro. From these data we conclude that in addition to the species, valency, and orientation of sugar residues, size is also an important determinant for effective recognition and processing of substrates by the ASGPr. Therefore, these data have important implications for the design of ASGPr-specific carriers that are aimed at hepatocyte-directed delivery of drugs and genes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m101786200

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 231

Metadata

Authors
Rensen, P. C. N., Sliedregt, L. A. J. M., Ferns, M., Kieviet, E., van Rossenberg, S. M. W., van Leeuwen, S. H., van Berkel, T. J. C., & Biessen, E. A. L.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-10
Volume
276
Issue
40
Pages
37577-37584
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967660067
Cited by
231
References
3
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of the Upper Size Limit for Uptake and Processing of Ligands by the Asialoglycoprotein Receptor on Hepatocytesin Vitro and in Vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m101786200
The paper
Rensen, P. C. N., Sliedregt, L. A. J. M., Ferns, M., Kieviet, E., van Rossenberg, S. M. W., van Leeuwen, S. H., van Berkel, T. J. C., & Biessen, E. A. L. (2001). Determination of the Upper Size Limit for Uptake and Processing of Ligands by the Asialoglycoprotein Receptor on Hepatocytesin Vitro and in Vivo. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m101786200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.