Cited by 179DNA Repair MechanismsEnzyme Structure and FunctionDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

XRCC4 protein interactions with XRCC4-like factor (XLF) create an extended grooved scaffold for DNA ligation and double strand break repair

Open access
Hammel, Michal, Rey, Martial, Yu, Yaping, Mani, Rajam S., Classen, Scott, Liu, Mona, Pique, Michael E., Fang, Shujuan +5 more·2011·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The XRCC4-like factor (XLF)-XRCC4 complex is essential for nonhomologous end joining, the major repair pathway for DNA double strand breaks in human cells. Yet, how XLF binds XRCC4 and impacts nonhomologous end joining functions has been enigmatic. Here, we report the XLF-XRCC4 complex crystal structure in combination with biophysical and mutational analyses to define the XLF-XRCC4 interactions. Crystal and solution structures plus mutations characterize alternating XRCC4 and XLF head domain interfaces forming parallel super-helical filaments. XLF Leu-115 ("Leu-lock") inserts into a hydrophobic pocket formed by XRCC4 Met-59, Met-61, Lys-65, Lys-99, Phe-106, and Leu-108 in synergy with pseudo-symmetric β-zipper hydrogen bonds to drive specificity. XLF C terminus and DNA enhance parallel filament formation. Super-helical XLF-XRCC4 filaments form a positively charged channel to bind DNA and align ends for efficient ligation. Collective results reveal how human XLF and XRCC4 interact to bind DNA, suggest consequences of patient mutations, and support a unified molecular mechanism for XLF-XRCC4 stimulation of DNA ligation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m111.272641

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hammel, M., Rey, M., Yu, Y., Mani, R. S., Classen, S., Liu, M., Pique, M. E., Fang, S., Mahaney, B. L., Weinfeld, M., Schriemer, D. C., Lees-Miller, S. P., & Tainer, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Scripps Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hammel, Michal
  • Tainer, John A.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
286
Issue
37
Pages
32638-32650
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139045592
Cited by
179
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 17
FWCI
7.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (-AC02-05CH11231, 05CH11231, DE AC02 05CH11231, DE-AC02-)
  • Alberta Cancer Foundation
  • University of Alberta
  • National Institutes of Health (DE-AC02–05CH11231, CA92584, 69139)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
  • National Cancer Institute (P01-CA 92584, P01CA092584)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (AC02‐05CH11231, DE-AC02-05CH11231, 05CH11231)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
XRCC4, X-ray luminosity function, non-homologous end joining, DNA double-strand break repair, DNA ligation, protein-protein interaction, crystal structure, head domain, DNA binding
MeSH terms
Cell Line, DNA, DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Protein Binding, Protein Structure, Secondary, Crystallography, X-Ray, Protein Structure, Quaternary, DNA Repair Enzymes, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review