Cited by 178Hemoglobin structure and functionBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyRedox biology and oxidative stress

Nitric Oxide Formation by Escherichia coli

Open access
Corker, Hazel, Poole, Robert K.·2003·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO) is a key signaling and defense molecule in biological systems. The bactericidal effects of NO produced, for example, by macrophages are resisted by various bacterial NO-detoxifying enzymes, the best understood being the flavohemoglobins exemplified by Escherichia coli Hmp. However, many bacteria, including E. coli, are reported to produce NO by processes that are independent of denitrification in which NO is an obligatory intermediate. We demonstrate using an NO-specific electrode that E. coli cells, grown anaerobically with nitrate as terminal electron acceptor, generate significant NO on adding nitrite. The periplasmic cytochrome c nitrite reductase (Nrf) is shown, by comparing Nrf+ and Nrf- mutants, to be largely responsible for NO generation. Surprisingly, an hmp mutant did not accumulate more NO but, rather, failed to produce detectable NO. Anaerobic growth of the hmp mutant was not stimulated by nitrate, and the mutant failed to produce periplasmic cytochrome(s) c, leading to the hypothesis that accumulating NO in the absence of Hmp inactivates the global anaerobic regulator Fnr by reaction with the [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster (Cruz-Ramos, H., Crack, J., Wu, G., Hughes, M. N., Scott, C., Thomson, A. J., Green, J., and Poole, R. K. (2002) EMBO J. 21, 3235-3244). Fnr thus failed to up-regulate nitrite reductase. The model is supported by the inability of an fnr mutant to generate NO and by the restoration of NO accumulation to hmp mutants upon introducing a plasmid encoding Fnr* (D154A) known to confer activity in the presence of oxygen. A cytochrome bd-deficient mutant retained NO-generating activity. The present study reveals a critical balance between NO-generating and -detoxifying activities during anaerobic growth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m303282200

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several following studies have proposed different mechanisms of bacterial NO formation independent of respiratory denitrification, such as arginine-dependent bacterial NOS activity, DNRA, and non-enzymatic processes.

    “However, several following studies on bacterial NO formation have proposed different mechanisms independent of respiratory denitrification such as arginine dependent bacterial NOS enzymatic activity, DNRA and non-enzymatic processes [15,32–34].”
  • Respiratory denitrification can generate small but relevant amounts of NO as an intermediate product and has been implicated in bacterial NO production in the gut.

    “Respiratory denitrification can also generate small but relevant amounts of NO as an intermediate product and has been implicated in the bacterial NO production in the gut [32,33].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Gardner, P. R., Gardner, A. M., Martin, L. A., and Salzman, A. L. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 10378 -10383
  2. Hausladen, A., Gow, A. J., and Stamler, J. S. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
  3. Wu, G., Wainwright, L. M., and Poole, R. K. (2003) Adv. Microb. Physiol. 47, in press
  4. Hausladen, A., Gow, A. J., and Stamler, J. S. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corker, H., & Poole, R. K.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Poole, Robert K.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-08
Volume
278
Issue
34
Pages
31584-31592
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087747384
Cited by
178
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (P18939)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Hemoglobin structure and function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
Keywords
nitric oxide production, Escherichia coli, cytochrome c nitrite reductase, flavohemoglobin, Hmp, FNR, [4Fe-4S] cluster, nitrite reductase, anaerobic growth, cytochrome bd, nitric oxide detoxification
MeSH terms
Dihydropteridine Reductase, Escherichia coli, Hemeproteins, Iron-Sulfur Proteins, Mutation, NADH, NADPH Oxidoreductases, Nitric Oxide, Nitrite Reductases, Sensitivity and Specificity, Escherichia coli Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review