CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 65

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification of a Novel Endocytic Recycling Signal in the D1 Dopamine Receptor

Vargas, Gabriel A., von Zastrow, Mark·2004·Journal of Biological Chemistry
DOI 10.1074/jbc.m401034200
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m401034200

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Receptor recycling can be a signal-mediated event.

    “Although receptor recycling is generally believed to be a default pathway, recent studies have provided evidence that it can also be a signal-mediated event (Tanowitz and von Zastrow, 2003;Tran et al, 2003;Vargas and Von Zastrow, 2004).”

    From Sorting nexin 17 facilitates LRP recycling in the early endosome (2005) · cites this paper as Vargas and Von Zastrow, 2004

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Nestler, 1997, Nature, 385, 578, 10.1038/385578a0 · DOI
  2. Barboi, 1999, Clin. Neuropharmacol., 22, 184
  3. Civelli, 1993, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 33, 281, 10.1146/annurev.pa.33.040193.001433 · DOI
  4. Caron, 1993, Recent Prog. Horm. Res., 48, 277, 10.1016/B978-0-12-571148-7.50014-2 · DOI
  5. Sorkin, 2002, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 3, 600, 10.1038/nrm883 · DOI
  6. Dumartin, 1998, J. Neurosci., 18, 1650, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-05-01650.1998 · DOI
  7. Ariano, 1997, Synapse, 27, 313, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2396(199712)27:4<313::AID-SYN5>3.0.CO;2-F · DOI
  8. Vickery, 1999, J. Cell Biol., 144, 31, 10.1083/jcb.144.1.31 · DOI
  9. Ferguson, 2001, Pharmacol. Rev., 53, 1
  10. Jackson, 2002, J. Neurochem., 82, 683, 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.01001.x · DOI
  11. Lamey, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 9415, 10.1074/jbc.M111811200 · DOI
  12. Mayor, 1993, J. Cell Biol., 121, 1257, 10.1083/jcb.121.6.1257 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Gruenberg, 2001, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2, 721, 10.1038/35096054 · DOI
  14. Cao, 1999, Nature, 401, 286, 10.1038/45816 · DOI
  15. Gage, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 44712, 10.1074/jbc.M107417200 · DOI
  16. Kishi, 2001, Mol. Endocrinol., 15, 1624, 10.1210/mend.15.9.0698 · DOI
  17. Cong, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 45145, 10.1074/jbc.M106087200 · DOI
  18. Tanowitz, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 45978, 10.1074/jbc.M304504200 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Guan, 1992, J. Biol. Chem., 267, 21995, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)41623-7 · DOI
  20. Keith, 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 19021, 10.1074/jbc.271.32.19021 · DOI
  21. Evans, 1992, Science, 258, 1952, 10.1126/science.1335167 · DOI
  22. Tsao, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 11130, 10.1074/jbc.275.15.11130 · DOI
  23. Murray, 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 24987, 10.1074/jbc.273.39.24987 · DOI
  24. Hein, 1994, J. Biol. Chem., 269, 27719, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)47045-7 · DOI
  25. Chaar, 2001, J. Neurochem., 79, 1047, 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00648.x · DOI
  26. Kim, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 7999, 10.1074/jbc.M308281200 · DOI
  27. Tsao, 2000, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 10, 365, 10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00096-9 · DOI
  28. Galet, 2003, Mol. Endocrinol., 17, 411, 10.1210/me.2002-0161 · DOI
  29. Galet, 2004, Mol. Endocrinol., 18, 434, 10.1210/me.2003-0293 · DOI
  30. Law, 1999, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 289, 607
  31. Bermak, 2001, Nat. Cell Biol., 3, 492, 10.1038/35074561 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Wang, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 36848, 10.1074/jbc.M301540200 · DOI
  33. Horn, 1998, Nucleic Acids Res., 26, 275, 10.1093/nar/26.1.275 · DOI
  34. Koenig, 1997, Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 18, 276, 10.1016/S0165-6147(97)90643-X · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vargas, G. A., & von Zastrow, M.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-09
Volume
279
Issue
36
Pages
37461-37469
ISSN
0021-9258
DOI
10.1074/jbc.m401034200
Cited by
65
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review