CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 97

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Disabled-2 (Dab2) Mediates Transforming Growth Factor β(TGFβ)-stimulated Fibronectin Synthesis through TGFβ-activatedKinase 1 and Activation of the JNKPathway

Hocevar, Barbara A., Prunier, Celine, Howe, Philip H.·2005·Journal of Biological Chemistry
DOI 10.1074/jbc.m501150200
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m501150200

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several mechanisms have been suggested for Dab2 involvement in the TGF-beta pathway, but their actual operation in intact animals and physiological settings has yet to be demonstrated.

    “Thus, several mechanisms have been suggested for the involvement of Dab2 in TGF-beta pathway, such as receptor recycling, adapting function for Smad activation, or non-canonical TGF-beta signaling through the Ras-MAPK pathway, although the actual operation of these mechanisms in intact animals and physiological settings have yet to be demonstrated.”

    From Endocytosis and Physiology: Insights from Disabled-2 Deficient Mice (2016) · cites this paper as Hocevar et al., 2005

    The Abstract (page unavailable) describes Dab2 as an adaptor linking TGFβ receptors to Smad activation and reports a Dab2–TAK1–JNK signaling mechanism tested in cultured cells. That supports the claim that mechanisms have been proposed without demonstration in intact animals, but the paper does not establish TGFβ receptor recycling or a specifically Ras-mediated MAPK mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. Geiger, 2001, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2, 793, 10.1038/35099066 · DOI
  2. Hynes, 1985, Annu. Rev. CellBiol., 1, 67, 10.1146/annurev.cb.01.110185.000435 · DOI
  3. Pankov, 2002, J.Cell Sci., 115, 3861, 10.1242/jcs.00059 · DOI
  4. George, 1993, Development, 119, 1079, 10.1242/dev.119.4.1079 · DOI
  5. Massague, 1990, Annu. Rev. CellBiol., 6, 597, 10.1146/annurev.cb.06.110190.003121 · DOI
  6. Shi, 2003, Cell, 113, 685, 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00432-X · DOI
  7. Derynck, 2003, Nature, 425, 577, 10.1038/nature02006 · DOI
  8. ten Dijke, 2004, Trends Biochem. Sci., 29, 265, 10.1016/j.tibs.2004.03.008 · DOI
  9. Tsukazaki, 1998, Cell, 95, 779, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81701-8 · DOI
  10. Hocevar, 2001, EMBO J., 20, 2789, 10.1093/emboj/20.11.2789 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Chen, 1996, Nature, 383, 691, 10.1038/383691a0 · DOI
  12. Labbe, 1998, Mol. Cell, 2, 109, 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80119-7 · DOI
  13. Liberati, 1999, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 96, 4844, 10.1073/pnas.96.9.4844 · DOI
  14. Sano, 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 8949, 10.1074/jbc.274.13.8949 · DOI
  15. Hua, 1998, Genes Dev., 12, 3084, 10.1101/gad.12.19.3084 · DOI
  16. Hartsough, 1995, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 7117, 10.1074/jbc.270.13.7117 · DOI
  17. Mucsi, 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 16567, 10.1074/jbc.271.28.16567 · DOI
  18. Atfi, 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 1429, 10.1074/jbc.272.3.1429 · DOI
  19. Hocevar, 1999, EMBO J., 18, 1345, 10.1093/emboj/18.5.1345 · DOI
  20. Hanafusa, 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 27161, 10.1074/jbc.274.38.27161 · DOI
  21. Piek, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 19945, 10.1074/jbc.M102382200 · DOI
  22. Sirard, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 2063, 10.1074/jbc.275.3.2063 · DOI
  23. Utsugi, 2003, Am. J. Respir. CellMol. Biol., 28, 754, 10.1165/rcmb.4892 · DOI
  24. Engel, 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 37413, 10.1074/jbc.274.52.37413 · DOI
  25. Davis, 2000, Cell, 103, 239, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00116-1 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Yamaguchi, 1995, Science, 270, 2008, 10.1126/science.270.5244.2008 · DOI
  27. Ishitani, 2003, Mol. Cell. Biol., 23, 131, 10.1128/MCB.23.1.131-139.2003 · DOI
  28. Ninomiya-Tsuji, 1999, Nature, 398, 252, 10.1038/18465 · DOI
  29. Smit, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 17232, 10.1074/jbc.M307801200 · DOI
  30. Moriguchi, 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 13675, 10.1074/jbc.271.23.13675 · DOI
  31. Shibuya, 1996, Science, 272, 1179, 10.1126/science.272.5265.1179 · DOI
  32. Yamaguchi, 1999, EMBO J., 18, 179, 10.1093/emboj/18.1.179 · DOI
  33. Morris, 2001, Traffic, 2, 111, 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2001.020206.x · DOI · Paper page
  34. Oleinikov, 2000, Biochem. J., 347, 613, 10.1042/bj3470613 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Yun, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 36572, 10.1074/jbc.M304384200 · DOI
  36. Gotthardt, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 25616, 10.1074/jbc.M000955200 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Morris, 2002, Traffic, 3, 331, 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2002.30503.x · DOI · Paper page
  38. Brummelkamp, 2002, Science, 296, 550, 10.1126/science.1068999 · DOI
  39. Derijard, 1994, Cell, 76, 1025, 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90380-8 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Danielson, 1988, DNA (N. Y.), 7, 261
  41. Tong, 1997, Nat.Struct. Biol., 4, 311, 10.1038/nsb0497-311 · DOI
  42. Alessi, 1995, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 27489, 10.1074/jbc.270.46.27489 · DOI
  43. Shirakabe, 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 8141, 10.1074/jbc.272.13.8141 · DOI
  44. Xia, 2003, TrendsBiochem. Sci., 14, 94
  45. Dean, 1988, J. Cell Biol., 106, 2159, 10.1083/jcb.106.6.2159 · DOI
  46. Wrana, 1991, Eur. J. Biochem., 197, 519, 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb15940.x · DOI
  47. Bowlus, 1991, J. Biol. Chem., 266, 1122, 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)35291-2 · DOI
  48. van Dam, 1993, EMBO J., 12, 479, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05680.x · DOI · Paper page
  49. Lee, 2000, J. Leukocyte Biol., 68, 909, 10.1189/jlb.68.6.909 · DOI
  50. Wang, 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 22771, 10.1074/jbc.272.36.22771 · DOI
  51. Mihaly, 2001, Mech. Dev., 102, 67, 10.1016/S0925-4773(01)00285-4 · DOI
  52. Takatsu, 2000, Mol. Cell. Biol., 20, 3015, 10.1128/MCB.20.9.3015-3026.2000 · DOI
  53. Ono, 2003, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 307, 332, 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)01207-5 · DOI
  54. Massague, 2000, EMBOJ., 19, 1745, 10.1093/emboj/19.8.1745 · DOI
  55. Verrecchia, 2001, Oncogene, 20, 3332, 10.1038/sj.onc.1204448 · DOI
  56. Wong, 1999, Mol. Cell. Biol., 19, 1821, 10.1128/MCB.19.3.1821 · DOI
  57. Goberdhan, 1998, BioEssays, 20, 1009, 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199812)20:12<1009::AID-BIES7>3.0.CO;2-D · DOI
  58. Sluss, 1997, J.Cell. Biochem., 67, 1, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(19971001)67:1<1::AID-JCB1>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI
  59. Weston, 2003, Genes Dev., 17, 1271, 10.1101/gad.1087303 · DOI
  60. Zhang, 2003, EMBO J., 17, 4443, 10.1093/emboj/cdg440 · DOI
  61. Vassalli, 1994, Genes Dev., 8, 414, 10.1101/gad.8.4.414 · DOI
  62. Ramet, 2002, Dev. Biol., 241, 145, 10.1006/dbio.2001.0502 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Javelaud, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 24624, 10.1074/jbc.M301942200 · DOI
  64. Almeida, 2000, J. Cell Biol., 149, 741, 10.1083/jcb.149.3.741 · DOI
  65. Hocking, 1998, J. Cell Biol., 141, 241, 10.1083/jcb.141.1.241 · DOI
  66. Prunier, 2005, J.Biol. Chem., 280, 17540, 10.1074/jbc.M500974200 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hocevar, B. A., Prunier, C., & Howe, P. H.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-07
Volume
280
Issue
27
Pages
25920-25927
ISSN
0021-9258
DOI
10.1074/jbc.m501150200
Cited by
97
References
5
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review