The DOI matches its Crossref record.
UBPY-mediated Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) De-ubiquitination Promotes EGFR Degradation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A truncation of USP8 containing both MIT and Rhod interacts with activated EGFR complexes.
“A truncation of USP8 containing both MIT and Rhod has been shown to interact with activated EGFR complexes (26)”
From Regulation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Ubiquitination and Trafficking by the USP8·STAM Complex (2010) · cites this paper as [26]
USP8 inactivation leads to enhanced ubiquitination of EGFR in response to ligand-induced activation.
“Consistent with these findings, USP8 inactivation leads to enhanced ubiquitination of EGFR in response to ligand-induced activation (26,27)”
From Regulation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Ubiquitination and Trafficking by the USP8·STAM Complex (2010) · cites this paper as [26]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- Olayioye, 2000, EMBO J., 19, 3159, 10.1093/emboj/19.13.3159 · DOI
- Yarden, 2001, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2, 127, 10.1038/35052073 · DOI · Paper page
- Marmor, 2004, Oncogene, 23, 2057, 10.1038/sj.onc.1207390 · DOI
- Alwan, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 35781, 10.1074/jbc.M301326200 · DOI
- Katzmann, 2002, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 3, 893, 10.1038/nrm973 · DOI · Paper page
- Thien, 2001, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2, 294, 10.1038/35067100 · DOI
- Levkowitz, 1998, Genes Dev., 12, 3663, 10.1101/gad.12.23.3663 · DOI
- Sorkin, 1998, Front. Biosci., 3, 729, 10.2741/A316 · DOI
- Hicke, 2003, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 19, 141, 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.110701.154617 · DOI
- Haglund, 2003, Nat. Cell Biol., 5, 461, 10.1038/ncb983 · DOI · Paper page
- Mosesson, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 21323, 10.1074/jbc.C300096200 · DOI · Paper page
- Huang, 2006, Mol. Cell, 21, 737, 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.02.018 · DOI · Paper page
- Duan, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 28950, 10.1074/jbc.M304474200 · DOI · Paper page
- Huang, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 43411, 10.1074/jbc.M306072200 · DOI
- Waterman, 2002, EMBO J., 21, 303, 10.1093/emboj/21.3.303 · DOI
- Urbe, 2003, J. Cell Sci., 116, 4169, 10.1242/jcs.00723 · DOI · Paper page
- Lu, 2003, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 100, 7626, 10.1073/pnas.0932599100 · DOI · Paper page
- Bishop, 2002, J. Cell Biol., 157, 91, 10.1083/jcb.200112080 · DOI
- Papa, 1993, Nature, 366, 313, 10.1038/366313a0 · DOI
- Amerik, 2000, Mol. Biol. Cell, 11, 3365, 10.1091/mbc.11.10.3365 · DOI
- Nikko, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 50732, 10.1074/jbc.M306953200 · DOI
- Luhtala, 2004, J. Cell Biol., 166, 717, 10.1083/jcb.200403139 · DOI
- Swaminathan, 1999, Mol. Biol. Cell, 10, 2583, 10.1091/mbc.10.8.2583 · DOI
- Dupre, 2001, Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 4482, 10.1128/MCB.21.14.4482-4494.2001 · DOI
- Mizuno, 2005, Mol. Biol. Cell, 16, 5163, 10.1091/mbc.e05-06-0560 · DOI · Paper page
- Row, 2006, J. Biol. Chem., 281, 12618, 10.1074/jbc.M512615200 · DOI · Paper page
- Gnesutta, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 39448, 10.1074/jbc.M103454200 · DOI
- Kato, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 37481, 10.1074/jbc.M007251200 · DOI · Paper page
- Bordo, 2002, EMBO Rep., 3, 741, 10.1093/embo-reports/kvf150 · DOI
- Naviglio, 1998, EMBO J., 17, 3241, 10.1093/emboj/17.12.3241 · DOI · Paper page
- Tice, 1999, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 96, 1415, 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1415 · DOI
- Wu, 2004, Mol. Cell. Biol., 24, 7748, 10.1128/MCB.24.17.7748-7757.2004 · DOI · Paper page
- Hu, 2002, Cell, 111, 1041, 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01199-6 · DOI
- Longva, 2002, J. Cell Biol., 156, 843, 10.1083/jcb.200106056 · DOI
- Papa, 1999, Mol. Biol. Cell, 10, 741, 10.1091/mbc.10.3.741 · DOI
- Nicholson, 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 102, 2328, 10.1073/pnas.0409675102 · DOI
- Kario, 2005, J. Biol. Chem., 280, 7038, 10.1074/jbc.M408575200 · DOI
- McCullough, 2004, J. Cell Biol., 166, 487, 10.1083/jcb.200401141 · DOI
- Amerik, 2004, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1695, 189, 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2004.10.003 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Berlin, I., Schwartz, H., & Nash, P. D. (2010) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m109.016287 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Alwan, H. A. J., & van Leeuwen, J. E. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 282
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1658-1669
- ISSN
- 0021-9258
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review