CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 19

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The molecular basis for immune dysregulation by the hyperactivated E62K mutant of the GTPase RAC2

Arrington, Megan E., Temple, Brenda, Schaefer, Antje, Campbell, Sharon L.·2020·Journal of Biological Chemistry
DOI 10.1074/jbc.ra120.012915
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.ra120.012915

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. Gu, 2003, Hematopoietic cell regulation by Rac1 and Rac2 guanosine triphosphatases, Science, 302, 445, 10.1126/science.1088485 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Vetter, 2001, The guanine nucleotide-binding switch in three dimensions, Science, 294, 1299, 10.1126/science.1062023 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Watanabe, 2014, DOCK2 and DOCK5 act additively in neutrophils to regulate chemotaxis, superoxide production, and extracellular trap formation, J. Immunol, 193, 5660, 10.4049/jimmunol.1400885 · DOI
  4. Mulloy, 2010, Rho GTPases in hematopoiesis and hemopathies, Blood, 115, 936, 10.1182/blood-2009-09-198127 · DOI
  5. Ambruso, 2000, Human neutrophil immunodeficiency syndrome is associated with an inhibitory Rac2 mutation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 97, 4654, 10.1073/pnas.080074897 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Hodge, 2016, Regulating Rho GTPases and their regulators, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol, 17, 496, 10.1038/nrm.2016.67 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Thomas, 2017, The phagocyte respiratory burst: historical perspectives and recent advances, Immunol. Lett, 192, 88, 10.1016/j.imlet.2017.08.016 · DOI
  8. Itakura, 2013, p21-activated kinase (PAK) regulates cytoskeletal reorganization and directional migration in human neutrophils, PLoS ONE, 8, e73063, 10.1371/journal.pone.0073063 · DOI
  9. Kumar, 2017, Structure, biochemistry, and biology of PAK kinases, Gene, 605, 20, 10.1016/j.gene.2016.12.014 · DOI
  10. Wittinghofer, 2011, Structure-function relationships of the G domain, a canonical switch motif, Annu. Rev. Biochem, 80, 943, 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062708-134043 · DOI
  11. Krauthammer, 2012, Exome sequencing identifies recurrent somatic Rac1 mutations in melanoma, Nat. Genet, 44, 1006, 10.1038/ng.2359 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gasper, 2008, The role of the conserved switch II glutamate in guanine nucleotide exchange factor-mediated nucleotide exchange of GTP-binding proteins, J. Mol. Biol, 379, 51, 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.03.011 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Bos, 2007, GEFs and GAPs : critical elements in the control of small G proteins, Cell, 129, 865, 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.018 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Kim, 2016, Systematic functional interrogation of rare cancer variants identifies oncogenic alleles, Cancer Discov, 6, 714, 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0160 · DOI
  15. Zehir, 2017, Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10,000 patients, Nat. Med, 23, 703, 10.1038/nm.4333 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Tate, 2019, COSMIC: the catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer, Nucleic Acids Res, 47, D941, 10.1093/nar/gky1015 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Dika, 2013, KIT, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in nail apparatus melanoma, Pigment Cell Melanoma Res, 26, 758, 10.1111/pcmr.12123 · DOI
  18. Marei, 2017, GEFs: dual regulation of Rac1 signaling, Small GTPases, 8, 90, 10.1080/21541248.2016.1202635 · DOI
  19. Lawson, 2018, Rho GTPase signaling complexes in cell migration and invasion, J. Cell Biol, 217, 447, 10.1083/jcb.201612069 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Pan, 2015, P-Rex and Vav Rac-GEFs in platelets control leukocyte recruitment to sites of inflammation, Blood, 125, 1146, 10.1182/blood-2014-07-591040 · DOI
  21. Hirshberg, 1997, The Crystal Structure of human Rac1, a member of the rho-family complexed with a GTP analogue, Nat. Struct. Biol, 4, 147, 10.1038/nsb0297-147 · DOI
  22. Ferrandez, 2017, Allosteric inhibition of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor DOCK5 by a small molecule, Sci. Rep, 7, 14409, 10.1038/s41598-017-13619-2 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Davis, 2013, RAC1P29S is a spontaneously activating cancer-associated GTPase, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 110, 912, 10.1073/pnas.1220895110 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Bunney, 2009, Structural insights into formation of an active signaling complex between Rac and phospholipase C γ2, Mol. Cell, 34, 223, 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.02.023 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Kelly, 2005, How to study proteins by circular dichroism, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1751, 119, 10.1016/j.bbapap.2005.06.005 · DOI
  26. Hobbs, 2015, Redox regulation of Rac1 by thiol oxidation, Free Radic. Biol. Med, 79, 237, 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.09.027 · DOI
  27. Yin, 2017, A KRAS GTPase K104Q mutant retains downstream signaling by offsetting defects in regulation, J. Biol. Chem, 292, 4446, 10.1074/jbc.M116.762435 · DOI
  28. Rodriguez, 2014, Clustering by fast search and find of density peaks, Science, 344, 1492, 10.1126/science.1242072 · DOI
  29. Haeusler, 2003, Comparative functional analysis of the Rac GTPases, FEBS Lett, 555, 556, 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)01351-6 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Graham, 2002, MgF3− as a transition state analog of phosphoryl transfer, Chem. Biol, 9, 375, 10.1016/S1074-5521(02)00112-6 · DOI
  31. Rittinger, 1997, Crystal structure of a small G protein in complex with the GTPase-activating protein rhoGAP, Nature, 388, 693, 10.1038/41805 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Würtele, 2001, How the Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoS toxin downregulates Rac, Nat. Struct. Biol, 8, 23, 10.1038/83007 · DOI
  33. Murugan, 2009, Detection of two novel mutations and relatively high incidence of H-RAS mutations in Vietnamese oral cancer, Oral. Oncol, 45, e161, 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.05.638 · DOI
  34. Gu, 2006, A novel analytical method for in vivo phosphate tracking, FEBS Lett, 580, 5885, 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.09.048 · DOI
  35. Baker, 2013, Site-specific monoubiquination activates Ras by impeding GTPase activating protein function, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol, 20, 46, 10.1038/nsmb.2430 · DOI
  36. Hobbs, 2013, Glutathiolated Ras: characterization and implications for Ras activation, Free Radic. Biol. Med, 57, 221, 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.10.531 · DOI
  37. Boriack-Sjodin, 1998, The structural basis of the activation of Ras by Sos, Nature, 394, 337, 10.1038/28548 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Snyder, 2002, Structural basis for the selective activation of Rho GTPases by Dbl exchange factors, Nat. Struct. Biol, 9, 468, 10.1038/nsb796 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Pantarelli, 2018, Rac-GTPases and Rac-GEFs in neutrophil adhesion, migration and recruitment, Eur. J. Clin. Invest, 48, e12939, 10.1111/eci.12939 · DOI
  40. McCormick, 2019, Cross-talk between Rho GTPases and PI3K in the neutrophil, Small GTPases, 10, 187, 10.1080/21541248.2017.1304855 · DOI
  41. Karnoub, 2001, Molecular basis for Rac1 recognition by guanine nucleotide exchange factors, Nat. Struct. Biol, 8, 1037, 10.1038/nsb719 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Chrencik, 2008, Structural basis of guanine nucleotide exchange mediated by the T-cell essential Vav1, J. Mol. Biol, 380, 828, 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.05.024 · DOI
  43. Lucato, 2015, The phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate-dependent Rac exchanger 1·Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (P-Rex1·Rac1) complex reveals the basis of Rac1 activation in breast cancer cells, J. Biol. Chem, 290, 20827, 10.1074/jbc.M115.660456 · DOI
  44. Cote, 2002, Identification of an evolutionarily conserved superfamily of DOCK180-related proteins with guanine nucleotide exchange activity, J. Cell Sci, 115, 4901, 10.1242/jcs.00219 · DOI
  45. Pick, 2014, Role of the Rho GTPase Rac in the activation of the phagocyte NADPH oxidase, Small GTPases, 5, e27952, 10.4161/sgtp.27952 · DOI
  46. Bokoch, 1999, Activation of LIM-kinase by Pak1 couples Rac/Cdc42 GTPase signalling to actin cytoskeletal dynamics, Nat. Cell Biol, 1, 253, 10.1038/12963 · DOI
  47. Chang, 2009, Inhibition of superoxide anion generation by CHS-111 via blockade of the p21-activated kinase, protein kinase B/Akt and protein kinase C signaling pathways in rat neutrophils, Eur. J. Pharmacol, 615, 207, 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.04.050 · DOI
  48. Arai, 2005, SDF-1 synergistically enhances IL-3-induced activation of the Raf-1/MEK/Erk signaling pathway through activation of Rac and its effector Pak kinases to promote hematopoiesis and chemotaxis, Cell. Signal, 17, 497, 10.1016/j.cellsig.2004.09.007 · DOI
  49. Morreale, 2000, Structure of Cdc42 bound to the GTPase binding domain of PAK, Nat. Struct. Biol, 7, 384, 10.1038/75158 · DOI
  50. Nassar, 1998, Structures of Cdc42 bound to the active and catalytically compromised forms of Cdc42GAP, Nat. Struct. Biol, 5, 1047, 10.1038/4156 · DOI
  51. Yang, 2009, Activation of Rho GTPases by DOCK exchange factors is mediated by a nucleotide sensor, Science, 325, 1398, 10.1126/science.1174468 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Lam, 2013, The Rac1 hypervariable region in targeting and signaling: a tail of many stories, Small GTPases, 4, 78, 10.4161/sgtp.23310 · DOI
  53. Mott, 2015, Structures of Ras superfamily effector complexes: what have we learnt in two decades?, Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol, 50, 85, 10.3109/10409238.2014.999191 · DOI
  54. Gavillet, 2018, A key role for Rac and Pak signaling in neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) formation defines a new potential therapeutic target, Am. J. Hematol, 93, 269, 10.1002/ajh.24970 · DOI
  55. Martyn, 2005, p21-activated kinase (Pak) regulates NADPH oxidase activation in human neutrophils, Blood, 106, 3962, 10.1182/blood-2005-03-0859 · DOI
  56. Wittchen, 2008, Chapter 14 Analysis of Low Molecular Weight GTPase Activity in endothelial cell cultures, Methods Enzymol, 443, 285, 10.1016/S0076-6879(08)02014-4 · DOI
  57. Shutes, 2005, Real-time in vitro measurement of GTP hydrolysis, Methods, 37, 183, 10.1016/j.ymeth.2005.05.019 · DOI
  58. Salomon-Ferrer, 2013, Routine microsecond molecular dynamics simulations with AMBER—Part II: particle mesh Ewald, J. Chem. Theory Comput, 9, 3878, 10.1021/ct400314y · DOI
  59. Götz, 2012, Routine microsecond molecular dynamics simulations with AMBER—Part I: generalized Born, J. Chem. Theory Comput, 8, 1542, 10.1021/ct200909j · DOI
  60. Le Grand, 2013, SPFP: Speed without compromise—a mixed precision model for GPU accelerated molecular dynamics simulations, Comp. Phys. Commun, 184, 374, 10.1016/j.cpc.2012.09.022 · DOI
  61. Maier, 2015, ff14sB: improving the accuracy of protein side chain and backbone parameters from ff99SB, J. Chem. Theory. Comput, 11, 3696, 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00255 · DOI
  62. Meagher, 2003, Development of polyphosphate parameters for use with the AMBER force field, J. Comput. Chem, 24, 1016, 10.1002/jcc.10262 · DOI
  63. Case, 2005, The Amber biomolecular simulation programs, J. Comput. Chem, 26, 1668, 10.1002/jcc.20290 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Tina, 2007, PIC: Protein Interactions Calculator, Nucleic Acids Res, 35, 473, 10.1093/nar/gkm423 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Arrington, M. E., Temple, B., Schaefer, A., & Campbell, S. L.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
295
Issue
34
Pages
12130-12142
ISSN
0021-9258
DOI
10.1074/jbc.ra120.012915
Cited by
19
References
8
Language
en
Licence
Funders
HHS | NIH | National Cancer Institute (P01 CA203657, R01 CA224428, P30 CA016086)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review