Cited by 68

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative functional analysis of the Rac GTPases

Haeusler, Lars Christian, Blumenstein, Lars, Stege, Patricia, Dvorsky, Radovan, Ahmadian, Mohammad Reza·2003·FEBS Letters

Abstract

Small GTPases of the Rho family including Rac, Rho and Cdc42 regulate different cellular processes like reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton by acting as molecular switches. The three distinct mammalian Rac proteins share very high sequence identity but how their specificity is achieved is hitherto unknown. Here we show that Rac1 and Rac3 are very closely related concerning their biochemical properties, such as effector interaction, nucleotide binding and hydrolysis. In contrast, Rac2 displays a slower nucleotide association and is more efficiently activated by the Rac‐GEF Tiam1. Modeling and normal mode analysis support the idea that altered dynamics of Rac2 at the switch I region may be responsible for different biochemical properties. These results provide insight into the individual functionalities of the Rac isoforms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0014-5793(03)01351-6

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 10.1038/nature01148 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1126/science.1062023 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1242/jcs.115.2.239 · DOI
  4. 10.1074/jbc.272.33.20384 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Michiels F., 1999, Biochem. Soc. Symp., 65, 125
  6. 10.1097/00062752-200301000-00003 · DOI
  7. 10.1074/jbc.274.47.33587 · DOI
  8. Ahmadian M.R., 2002, Methods Mol. Biol., 189, 45
  9. 10.1021/bi972621j · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.96.12.7065 · DOI
  11. 10.1074/jbc.271.12.6794 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nsb0297-147 · DOI
  13. 10.1021/bi00039a008 · DOI
  14. 10.1074/jbc.271.34.20470 · DOI
  15. 10.1074/jbc.M001027200 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/39651 · DOI
  17. 10.1021/bi9821770 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/375338a0 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/nsb719 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1074/jbc.M011600200 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/75158 · DOI
  22. 10.1182/blood-2002-04-1149 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 68

Metadata

Authors
Haeusler, L. C., Blumenstein, L., Stege, P., Dvorsky, R., & Ahmadian, M. R.
Venue
FEBS Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-11-26
Volume
555
Issue
3
Pages
556-560
ISSN
  • 0014-5793
  • 1873-3468
Cited by
68
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative functional analysis of the Rac GTPases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0014-5793(03)01351-6
The paper
Haeusler, L. C., Blumenstein, L., Stege, P., Dvorsky, R., & Ahmadian, M. R. (2003). Comparative functional analysis of the Rac GTPases. FEBS Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-5793(03)01351-6