Cited by 1,903Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingCellular transport and secretionReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

GEFs and GAPs: Critical Elements in the Control of Small G Proteins

Open access
Bos, Johannes L., Rehmann, Holger, Wittinghofer, Alfred·2007·Cell

Abstract

Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) regulate the activity of small guanine nucleotide-binding (G) proteins to control cellular functions. In general, GEFs turn on signaling by catalyzing the exchange from G-protein-bound GDP to GTP, whereas GAPs terminate signaling by inducing GTP hydrolysis. GEFs and GAPs are multidomain proteins that are regulated by extracellular signals and localized cues that control cellular events in time and space. Recent evidence suggests that these proteins may be potential therapeutic targets for developing drugs to treat various diseases, including cancer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.018

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RalA and RalB are activated by GEFs and inactivated by GAPs that consist of a regulatory β-subunit (RalGAPB) and one of two catalytic α-subunits, RalGAPA1 or RalGAPA2.

    “RalA and RalB are activated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and inactivated by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) that consist of a regulatory β-subunit (RalGAPB) and one of two catalytic α-subunits, RalGAPA1 or RalGAPA2 (refs. 15,16).”
  • Due to high amino acid sequence similarity among Rho GTPases, many identified GEFs and GAPs show only limited binding specificity, making spatiotemporal regulation necessary to allow specific signaling.

    “Due to the high amino acid sequence similarity among the Rho GTPases, however, many of the identified GEFs and GAPs show only limited binding specificity, which makes spatiotemporal regulation necessary to allow specific signaling [17].”

    From RhoA Signaling in Neurodegenerative Diseases (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bos, J. L., Rehmann, H., & Wittinghofer, A.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology (DE)
Corresponding author
Bos, Johannes L.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-06
Volume
129
Issue
5
Pages
865-877
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993735775
Cited by
1,903
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 86 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 119 · 2020: 106 · 2019: 104 · 2018: 101 · 2017: 104 · 2016: 118 · 2015: 85 · 2014: 91 · 2013: 108 · 2012: 90
FWCI
6.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2007-07-27)
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
guanine nucleotide exchange factor, GTPase-activating protein, small GTPases, G protein signaling, GTP hydrolysis, signal termination, therapeutic target, cancer
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Models, Molecular, Neoplasms, Signal Transduction, Monomeric GTP-Binding Proteins, Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors, GTPase-Activating Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review