7. Strategic and on-line planning: The influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance

Skehan, Peter, Foster, Pauline·2005·Language Learning & Language Teaching

DOI 10.1075/lllt.11.12ske

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1075/lllt.11.12ske

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Modelling Second Language Performance: Integrating Complexity, Accuracy, Fluency, and Lexis
Skehan, P. (2009) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amp047 · Cited by 1,161
Self-citation
Defining and operationalising L2 complexity
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2012) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.32.02bul · Cited by 587
The Differential Effects of Three Types of Task Planning on the Fluency, Complexity, and Accuracy in L2 Oral Production
Ellis, R. (2009) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amp042 · Cited by 522
Task-Based Language Teaching: Theory and Practice
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108643689 · Cited by 407
Self-citation
Fluency Training in the ESL Classroom: An Experimental Study of Fluency Development and Proceduralization
de Jong, N., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00620.x · Cited by 250
Eye tracking as a measure of noticing: A study of explicit recasts in SCMC
Smith, B. (2012) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44300 · Cited by 177
Chapter 2. On-line time pressure manipulations: L2 speaking performance under five types of planning and repetition conditions
Wang, Z. (2014) · Task-Based Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.5.02wan · Cited by 164
Tasks Versus Conditions: Two Perspectives on Task Research and Their Implications for Pedagogy
Skehan, P. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190515000100 · Cited by 162
Self-citation
The task is not enough: Processing approaches to task-based performance
Skehan, P., Xiaoyue, B., Qian, L., & Wang, Z. (2012) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168811428414 · Cited by 121
Self-citation
Investigating L2 Performance in Text Chat
Sauro, S., & Smith, B. (2010) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amq007 · Cited by 117
Chapter 1. The context for researching a processing perspective on task performance
Skehan, P. (2014) · Task-Based Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt.5.01ske · Cited by 39
Self-citation
The effect of dynamic assessment on complexity, accuracy, and fluency in EFL learners’ oral production
Ebrahimi, E. (2015) · International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning · doi:10.5861/ijrsll.2015.982 · Cited by 10

Authors: Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
Venue: Language Learning & Language Teaching
Publisher: John Benjamins Publishing Company
Published: 2005-03-11
Pages: 193-216
ISSN: 1569-9471 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1075/lllt.11.12ske
OpenAlex: W2502350861
Cited by: 205
References: 0
FWCI: 10.86
Type: book chapter
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review