The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research Methods in Applied Linguistics
Abstract
The Research Methods in Applied Linguistics (RMAL) series publishes authoritative general guides and in-depth explorations of central research methodology concerns in the entire field of Applied Linguistics. The hallmark of the series is the contribution to stimulating and advancing professional methodological debates in the domain. Books published in the series (both authored and edited volumes) will be key resources for applied linguists (including established researchers and newcomers to the field) and an invaluable source for research methodology courses. Main directions for the volumes in the series include (but are not limited to): Comprehensive introductions to research methods in Applied Linguistics (authoritative, introductions to domain-non specific methodologies). In-depth explorations of central methodological considerations and developments in specific areas of Applied Linguistics (authoritative treatments of domain-specific methodologies). Critical analyses that develop, expand, or challenge existing and/or novel methodological frameworks. In-depth reflections on central considerations in employing specific methodologies and/or addressing specific questions and problems in Applied Linguistics research. Authoritative accounts that foster improved understandings of the behind the scenes, inside story of the research process in Applied Linguistics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 · Cited by 8,540
Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research
Rayner, K. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372 · Cited by 7,979
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417632 · Cited by 6,567
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
SCHMIDT, R. W. (1990) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129 · Cited by 5,435
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123 · Cited by 4,377
The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316423530 · Cited by 4,136
Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?
Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00058027 · Cited by 3,585
Formulaic Language and the Lexicon
Wray, A. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511519772 · Cited by 2,873
Cited by
Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling
Etikan, I. (2016) · American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics · doi:10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 · Cited by 11,412
Exploring tensions between teachers’ grammar teaching beliefs and practices
Phipps, S., & Borg, S. (2009) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2009.03.002 · Cited by 668
Out-of-school digital gameplay and in-school L2 English vocabulary outcomes
Sundqvist, P., & Wikström, P. (2015) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.04.001 · Cited by 256
Content and Language Integrated Learning: A research agenda
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U. (2013) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444813000256 · Cited by 169
Yashima, T., & Zenuk-Nishide, L. (2008) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2008.03.006 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Venue
- Research methods in applied linguistics
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 2021-09-28
- ISSN
- 2590-096X (ISSN-L)
- DOI
- 10.1075/rmal
- OpenAlex
- W2020675527
- Cited by
- 2,793
- References
- 51
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1075/rmal
- The paper
- Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. (2021). Research methods in applied linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.