Cited by 185Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, DietRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

Food intake and energy expenditure of army recruits

Open access
Edholm, O. G., Adam, J. M., Healy, M. J. R., Wolff, H. S., Goldsmith, R., Best, T. W.·1970·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

1. The food intake of sixty-four infantry recruits was measured at six centres during 3 weeks of initial training. The daily energy expenditure was measured in thirty-five of these men. 2. The mean daily consumption of the sixty-four subjects provided them with 3850 kcal (16110 kJ); the energy expenditure of the thirty-five subjects averaged 3750 kcal (15690 kJ). 3. Serial auto- and cross-correlations of intake and expenditure were very small and there was no significant relationship between food intake and energy expenditure on the same day. 4. The intakes and expenditures of different subjects at the same centre were not independent. 5. There was a significant relationship between intake and expenditure for the whole period of the survey when results for all subjects were included. In three centres the correlation was high, +0.788 (P < 0.001), but was only + 0.083 (P < 0.5) in the remaining three centres. 6. There was a positive but not significant correlation between body-weight and the average food intake of 6 d. 7. There was a negative correlation between body-weight and calorie balance. 8. Weight change and calorie balance over 1 week were related, the correlation averaging 0.40. There was a correlation of 0.32 between daily weight changes and calorie balance. A rather small amount of variation in calorie balance can be explained by contemporary changes in weight.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/bjn19700112

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies found day-to-day variability in ad libitum energy intake with a standard deviation of about 500-600 kcal/d.

    “This sample size calculation was informed by previous studies measuring day to day variability of ad libitum energy intake having a standard deviation of about 500–600 kcal/d (Bray et al., 2008; Edholm et al., 1970; Tarasuk and Beaton, 1992).”

    From Ultra-Processed Diets Cause Excess Calorie Intake and Weight Gain: An Inpatient Randomized Controlled Trial of Ad Libitum Food Intake (2019) · cites this paper as Edholm et al., 1970

    The Results (p. 1097) analyse day-to-day variation in recruits’ energy intake, and the Discussion (Vol. 24) describes the variation as strikingly large. However, the retrieved passages do not report an intake standard deviation of about 500–600 kcal/day; the Dietary survey (p. 1095) describes meals served to recruits rather than explicitly identifying the intake as ad libitum. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]15. Wolff, H. S. (1959). Ergonomics 2, 354. 10, 1133. Coun. no. 289. Printed in Great Britain https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19700112 Published online by Cambridge University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Edholm, O. G., Adam, J. M., Healy, M. J. R., Wolff, H. S., Goldsmith, R., & Best, T. W.
Affiliations
National Institute for Medical Research (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
1970-12
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
1091-1107
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2056706838
Cited by
185
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
dietary intake, energy expenditure, military recruits, infantry training, energy balance, body weight, weight change, military nutrition
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Basal Metabolism, Body Weight, Diet, Physical Exertion, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Male, Metabolism, Military Medicine, Oxygen Consumption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review