Cited by 449

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Contribution of acetate to butyrate formation by human faecal bacteria

Duncan, Sylvia H., Holtrop, Grietje, Lobley, Gerald E., Calder, A. Graham, Stewart, Colin S., Flint, Harry J.·2004·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Acetate is normally regarded as an endproduct of anaerobic fermentation, but butyrate-producing bacteria found in the human colon can be net utilisers of acetate. The butyrate formed provides a fuel for epithelial cells of the large intestine and influences colonic health. [1- 13 C]Acetate was used to investigate the contribution of exogenous acetate to butyrate formation. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Roseburia spp. grown in the presence of 60 mm-acetate and 10 mm-glucose derived 85–90 % butyrate-C from external acetate. This was due to rapid interchange between extracellular acetate and intracellular acetyl-CoA, plus net acetate uptake. In contrast, a Coprococcus -related strain that is a net acetate producer derived only 28 % butyrate-C from external acetate. Different carbohydrate-derived energy sources affected butyrate formation by mixed human faecal bacteria growing in continuous or batch cultures. The ranking order of butyrate production rates was amylopectin > oat xylan > shredded wheat > inulin > pectin (continuous cultures), and inulin > amylopectin > oat xylan > shredded wheat > pectin (batch cultures). The contribution of external acetate to butyrate formation in these experiments ranged from 56 (pectin) to 90 % (xylan) in continuous cultures, and from 72 to 91 % in the batch cultures. This is consistent with a major role for bacteria related to F. prausnitzii and Roseburia spp. in butyrate formation from a range of substrates that are fermented in the large intestine. Variations in the dominant metabolic type of butyrate producer between individuals or with variations in diet are not ruled out, however, and could influence butyrate supply in the large intestine.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/bjn20041150

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1093/ajcn/25.12.1324 · DOI
  2. Wachtershauser, 2000, Rationale for the luminal provision of butyrate in intestinal disease, Eur J Nutr, 39, 164, 10.1007/s003940070020 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(19991115)13:21<2080::AID-RCM755>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
  4. 10.1128/AEM.69.2.1136-1142.2003 · DOI
  5. Duncan, 2002, Growth requirements and fermentation products of Fusobacterium prausnitzii, and a proposal to reclassify it as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii gen. nov., comb. nov, Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 52, 2141, 10.1099/00207713-52-6-2141 · DOI
  6. 10.3727/096504001108747558 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1987.tb02352.x · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0024-3205(03)00490-9 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11467.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1136/gut.34.3.386 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1128/AEM.66.4.1654-1661.2000 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb05110.x · DOI
  13. 10.1079/BJN2001403 · DOI
  14. 10.1128/AEM.68.10.5186-5190.2002 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1007/978-1-4615-4111-0_9 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1994.tb01631.x · DOI
  17. 10.1097/00008469-199608000-00002 · DOI
  18. Cummings, 1995, Human Colonic Bacteria: Role in Nutrition, Physiology and Pathology, 101
  19. Duncan, 2002, Roseburia intestinalis sp. nov., a novel saccharolytic, butyrate-producing bacterium from human faeces, Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 52, 1615, 10.1099/00207713-52-5-1615 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/ijc.2910600322 · DOI
  21. Mariadason, 2000, Genetic reprogramming in pathways of colonic cell maturation induced by short chain fatty acids: comparison with trichostatin A, sulindac, and curcurmin and implications for chemoprevention of colon cancer, Cancer Res, 60, 4561
  22. 10.1006/anae.1997.0125 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1989.tb00278.x · DOI
  24. 10.1079/BJN2000259 · DOI
  25. Shipley, 1972, Tracer Methods for In Vivo Kinetics, Theory and Applications
  26. 10.1078/0723-2020-00015 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/ajcn/53.6.1418 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/ajcn/55.1.70 · DOI
  29. 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.3.1031 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Wolin, 1999, Changes in fermentation pattern of fecal microbial communities associated with a drug treatment that increases dietary starch in the human colon, Appl Environ Microbiol, 65, 2807, 10.1128/AEM.65.7.2807-2812.1999 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 449

Metadata

Authors
Duncan, S. H., Holtrop, G., Lobley, G. E., Calder, A. G., Stewart, C. S., & Flint, H. J.
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2004-06
Volume
91
Issue
6
Pages
915-923
ISSN
  • 0007-1145
  • 1475-2662
Cited by
449
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review