CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 206Food composition and propertiesMicrobial Metabolites in Food BiotechnologyFood Nutrient Composition and Product Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 119 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nutritional Implications Of Resistant Starch

Open access
Asp, N.-G, van Amelsvoort, J. M. M., Hautvast, J. G. A. J.·1996·Nutrition Research Reviews
DOI 10.1079/nrr19960004
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and X-ray diffraction analysis were performed as described by Leloup et al. (1992)

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/nrr19960004

Cites

115 of 115 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 119 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Dysseler P. & Hoffem D. (1995 a). Ring test 1993–1994 for total and resistant starch determination: results and discussion. In Asp et al. (1995), pp. 87–94.
  2. Faisant N. (1994). [Resistant Starches, Structural Analyses of Undigested Starch at the End of the Small Intestine in Man and Physiological Effects.] Doctoral thesis, University of Paris.
  3. Langkilde A. M. & Andersson H. (1995 b). In vivo quantification of resistant starch in EURESTA reference materials using the ileostomy model. In Asp et al. (1995), pp. 31–32.
  4. Bach Knudsen, 1992, Methodological Aspects of in vivo Methods for Measurement of Starch Digestibility. EURESTA Report
  5. Miithers, 1993, Factors influencing caecal butyrate in rats fed raw potato starch, Proceedings the Nutrition Society, 52, 316A
  6. Champ, 1995, Recent Progress in the Analysis of Dietary Fibre (Proceedings of a Workshop, 1994), 45
  7. Dysseler P. & Hoffem D. (1995 c). Estimation of resistant starch intake in Europe. In Asp et al. (1995), pp. 84–86.
  8. Langkilde A. M. , Andersson H. , Faisant N. & Champ M. (1995). A comparison between the intubation technique and the ileostomy model for in vivo measurement of RS. In Asp et al. (1995), pp. 28–30.
  9. Van Munster I. P. , Nagengast F. M. , Jansen M. , De Boer H. , De Haan T. & Katan M. B. (1995). In-vitro inhibition of cholate conversion and decrease of soluble deoxycholate by lactulose and resistant starch. In Asp et al. 1995), pp. 171–174.
  10. Asp, 1995, Proceedings of the Concluding Plenary Meeting of EURESTA, including the final reports of the working groups, 204
  11. Livesey G. (1995). EURESTA Working Group IV: Energy value of resistant starch. In Asp et al. (1995), pp. 56–62.
  12. Eerlingen, 1994, Enzyme-resistant starch. V. The impact of retrogradation of waxy maize starch on enzyme susceptibility, Cereal Chemistry, 71, 351
  13. Eerlingen, 1993, Enzyme-resistant starch. I. Quantitative and qualitative influence of incubation time and temperature of autoclaved starch on resistant starch formation, Cereal Cheniistry, 70, 339
  14. Faisant N. , Colonna P. , Buléon A. , Bouchet B. , Gallant D. & Champ M. (1995 a). Characteristics of starches escaping human small intestine digestion/absorption. In Asp et al. (1995), pp. 115–116.
  15. Olesen M. & Gudmand-Høyer E. (1995). Hydrogen and methane breath test in evaluation of resistant starch. In Asp et al. (1995), pp. 22–24.
  16. Würsch P. & Delcour J. (1995). EURESTA Working Group II: Technology of resistant starch production. In Asp et al. (1995), pp. 15–19.
  17. Björck, 1992, Methodological Aspects of In Vivo Methods, for Measurement of Starch Digesribility. EURESTA Report, 35
  18. 10.1016/S0261-5614(84)80042-4 · DOI
  19. Bravo L. , Goñi I. , Fernandez-Martin F. & Saura-Calixto F. (1995). Effect of deep-fat frying on resistant starch formation in potato chips. In Asp et al. (1995), pp. 73–76.
  20. Dysseler P. & Hoffem D. (1995 b). Comparison between Englyst's method and Berry's modified method on 20 different starchy foods. In Asp et al. (1995), pp. 95–98.
  21. Botham R. L. , Cairns P. , Morris W. J. & Ring S. G. (1995). Physicochemical characterisation of resistant starch in ileostomy effluent. In Asp et al. (1995), pp. 71–72.
  22. Cummings, 1992, Methodological Aspects of In Vivo Methods for Measurement of Starch Digestibility. EURESTA Report, 19
  23. Langkilde A. M. & Andersson H. (1995 a). Excretion of starch, other nutrients and sterols from the small bowel - an ileostomy study. In Asp et al. (1995), pp. 126–127.
  24. Asp, 1992, Resistant Starch. Proceedings of the 2nd plenary meeting of EURESTA: European Flair Concerted Action No. 11 (COST 911). Physiological Implications of the Consumption of Resistant Starch in Man, European Journal Of Clinical Nutrition, 46, 148
  25. Ekwall, 1995, Digestibility of starch -amount and composition of resistant starch recovered in vivo from ileostomists and in vitro, Scandinavian Journal of Nutrition, 39, 145
  26. Flourié, 1992, Methodological Aspects of In Vivo Methods for Measurement of Starch Digestibility. EURESTA Report, 23
  27. Cummings J. H. , Edwards C. , Gee J. , Nagengast F. & Mathers J. (1995). EURESTA Working Group III B: Physiological effects of resistant starch in the large bowel. In Asp et at. (1995), pp. 38–55.
  28. Ekwall H. , Björck I. & Asp N.-G. (1995). Evaluation of RS content in an animal model based on antibiotic-treated rats. In Asp et al. (1995), pp. 105–107.
  29. Verbeek, 1995, Influence of dietary retrograded starch on the metabolism of neutral steroids and bile acids in rats, Brirish Journal of Nutrition, 74, 807
  30. Abia, 1996, Metabolic transformations of 14C-retrograded and U-14C-gelatinised bean starch in rat liver and carcass, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
  31. Asp, 1992, Preface: Resistant Starch. Proceedings of the 2nd plenary meeting of EURESTA: European Flair Concerted Action No. 11 on Physiological Implications of the Consumption of Resistant Starch in Man, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 46, S1
  32. Eggum, 1973, Report, 406
  33. Liljeberg H. , Granfeldt Y. & Björck I. (1995). RS content in relation to rate of starch hydrolysis and glycaemic response. In Asp et al. (1995), pp. 128–132.
  34. 1990, Complex Carbohvdrates in Foods. The report of the British Nutrition Foundation's Task Force
  35. Gallant, 1986, Ultrastructure of the maize starch granules, Journal of Food Microstructure, 5, 141
  36. Tagliabue A. , Raben A. , Heijnen M.-L. , Deurenberg P. , Pasquali E. & Astrup A. (1995 b). Resistant starch and postprandial energy expenditure. In Asp et al. (1995), pp. 166–168.
  37. Noah, 1995, Proceedings of the AEP conference 'Improving Production and Utilisution of Grain Legumes', 276
  38. Champ M. (1995). EURESTA Working Group I: Definition, analysis, physical and chemical characterization of RS. In Asp et al. (1995), pp. 1–14.
  39. Abia R. , Fry S. & Eastwood M. A. (1995). A comparison of U-14C-retrograded and U-14C-gelatinised bean starch metabolism in the rat. In Asp et al. (1995), pp. 63–64.
  40. Faisant, 1992, Methodological Aspects of In Vivo Methods for Measurement of Starch Digestibility. EURESTA Report, 25
  41. De Deckere E. A. M. , Verbeek M. J. F. , Van Amelsvoort J. M. M. , Tijburg L. B. M. & Beynen A. C. (1995). Resistant starch and faecal sterol excretion in rats. In Asp et al. (1995), pp. 78–81.
  42. Gee J. M. , Faulks R. M. , Mathers J. C. & Edwards C. A. (1995). Effects of resistant starch on intestinal structure and function – an animal model. In Asp et al. (1995), pp. 33–37.
  43. Hansen I. (1989). Dietary Fibre: Chemical and Physical Characteristics and Effects on Digestibility of Nutrients and Energy Metabolism in the Rat. PhD thesis. Copenhagen: Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University.
  44. Heijnen M.-L. A. , Deurenberg P. , Van Amelsvoort J. M. M. & Beynen A. C. (1995 a). The effect of resistant starch types 11 and 111 on the absorption of calcium, magnesium and phosphorus in healthy men. In Asp et al. (1995), pp. 120–121.
  45. Faisant, 1993, Bioavailability '93. Proceedings of the Conference on Nutritional, Chemical and Food Processing Implications of Nutrient Availability, 146
  46. Andersson H. (1995). The ileostomy model -an update with emphasis on the role of a possible adaptation. In Asp et al. (1995), pp. 25–27.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 206

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Asp, N.-G., van Amelsvoort, J. M. M., & Hautvast, J. G. A. J.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Unilever Research and Development Vlaardingen (NL)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Venue
Nutrition Research Reviews
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
1996-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
1-31
ISSN
  • 0954-4224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2700
DOI
10.1079/nrr19960004
OpenAlex
W2125791044
Cited by
206
References
119
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 4365 d)
Locations
  • Nutrition Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Nutrient Composition and Product Development
Keywords
resistant starch, nutritional implications, dietary fiber, starch digestibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review