Cited by 28Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsMenstrual Health and Disorders

Relation between severity of dysmenorrhea and endometrioma

Open access
CHOPIN, NICOLAS, BALLESTER, MARCOS, BORGHESE, BRUNO, FAUCONNIER, ARNAUD, FOULOT, HERVÉ, MALARTIC, CÉCILE, CHAPRON, CHARLES·2006·Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Background. To evaluate the relationship between the severity of dysmenorrhea and endometrioma. Methods. Descriptive study with prospective design. Two hundred and thirty‐nine women with histologically proved endometriomas. The severity of dysmenorrhea was assessed prospectively with a 10‐cm visual analog scale. Various indicators concerning the endometrioma and the extent of deep infiltrating endometriosis were recorded during surgery in 239 patients. Correlations were sought with a multiple regression logistic model. Results. According to univariate analysis, the following variables were related to more severe dysmenorrhea: subperitoneal infiltration (uterosacral ligament and rectal infiltration) and R‐AFS score of implants. None of the specific characteristics of endometriomas were associated with severe dysmenorrhea. After multiple regression analysis, rectal infiltration and R‐AFS score of implants were the only factors that remained related to dysmenorrhea severity. Conclusions. When there is an endometrioma, severe dysmenorrhea is not directly related with the characteristics specific to these ovarian cysts. The associated deep infiltrating endometriotic lesions and in particular rectal infiltration could explain these symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00016340600935490

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CHOPIN, N., BALLESTER, M., BORGHESE, B., FAUCONNIER, A., FOULOT, H., MALARTIC, C., & CHAPRON, C.
Affiliations
Hôpital Cochin (FR)
Corresponding author
CHAPRON, CHARLES
Venue
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-11
Volume
85
Issue
11
Pages
1375-1380
ISSN
  • 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0412
OpenAlex
W2027846141
Cited by
28
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
Keywords
dysmenorrhea severity, endometrioma, deep infiltrating endometriosis, ovarian endometriotic cysts, visual analogue scale
MeSH terms
Adult, Dysmenorrhea, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Ovarian Cysts, Prospective Studies, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review