Cited by 64Fish Ecology and Management StudiesMarine and fisheries researchFish Biology and Ecology Studies

Size at Release, Size‐Selective Mortality, and Age of Maturity of Willamette River Hatchery Yearling Chinook Salmon

Open access
Claiborne, Andrew M., Fisher, Joseph P., Hayes, Sean A., Emmett, Robert L.·2011·Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Abstract

We analyzed scales from returning Willamette River yearling Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha to explore the effects of size at release on subsequent adult returns. We tested the hypothesis that survival to adulthood is independent of size at ocean entry for yearling Chinook salmon. Significant size‐selective mortality, indicated by a larger size at ocean entry among surviving adults than among all released juveniles, was observed for Chinook salmon released in 2002–2004 but not for those released in 2005. Juvenile Chinook salmon released in 2002–2004 that entered the ocean at less than 150 mm in fork length were underrepresented in the returning adult populations. We also investigated the relationships between age at maturity and size at ocean entry, timing of release, circulus spacing, and size at the end of the first ocean year. We observed significant differences in fork length at the end of the first ocean winter among returning age‐4, ‐5, and ‐6 Chinook salmon; the younger returning fish were larger after their first year of ocean growth. Fork length at ocean entry and average first‐ocean‐year circulus spacing were significantly greater for age‐4 than for age‐5 and age‐6 Chinook salmon but were similar for age‐5 and age‐6 fish. Our analyses indicate that yearling Chinook salmon may experience size‐selective mortality, although the relationship between the intensity of size‐selective mortality and smolt‐to‐adult survival remains unclear.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00028487.2011.607050

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Claiborne, A. M., Fisher, J. P., Hayes, S. A., & Emmett, R. L.
Affiliations
  • Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission (US)
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Claiborne, Andrew M.
Venue
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
Published
2011-07
Volume
140
Issue
4
Pages
1135-1144
ISSN
  • 0002-8487 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-8659
OpenAlex
W2089790623
Cited by
64
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, size-selective mortality, age at maturity, smolt-to-adult survival, adult returns, Willamette River

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review