Cited by 359Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologyMedia and Digital Communication

Needing to connect: The effect of self and others on young people's involvement with their mobile phones

Open access
Walsh, Shari P., White, Katherine Marie, McD Young, Ross·2010·Australian Journal of Psychology

Abstract

The present research was a preliminary examination of young Australians' mobile phone behaviour. The study explored the relationship between, and psychological predictors of, frequency of mobile phone use and mobile phone involvement conceptualised as people's cognitive and behavioural interaction with their mobile phone. Participants were 946 Australian youth aged between 15 and 24 years. A descriptive measurement tool, the Mobile Phone Involvement Questionnaire, was developed. Self-identity and validation from others were explored as predictors of both types of mobile phone behaviour. A distinction was found between frequency of mobile phone use and mobile phone involvement. Only self-identity predicted frequency of use whereas both self-identity and validation from others predicted mobile phone involvement. These findings reveal the importance of distinguishing between frequency of use and people's psychological relationship with their phone and that factors relating to one's self-concept and approval from others both impact on young people's mobile phone involvement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00049530903567229

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some authors have based their research on the criteria of Internet addiction or general behavioral addiction, which had clear support on the criteria established from substance abuse research.

    “Some authors have based their research on the criteria of Internet addiction or general behavioral addiction, which had a clear support on the criteria established from substance abuse research (34, 80, 85, 88, 91, 95, 96, 102).”

    From Cell-phone addiction: a review (2016) · cites this paper as [91]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood. New York: Oxford University Press.
  2. Brown, R. I. F. (1997). A theoretical model of the behavioural addictions -Applied to offending. In J. E. Hodge, M. McMurran, & C. R. Hollin (Eds.), Addicted to crime (pp. 13- 65). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
  3. Mathews, R. (2004). The psychosocial aspects of mobile phone use amongst adolescents. InPsych, 26(6), 16-19.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walsh, S. P., White, K. M., & McD Young, R.
Affiliations
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology
Venue
Australian Journal of Psychology
Published
2010-11-05
Volume
62
Issue
4
Pages
194-203
ISSN
  • 0004-9530 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-9536
OpenAlex
W2109050268
Cited by
359
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
FWCI
31.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
mobile phone use, youth, self-identity, social validation, self-concept, psychological predictors, young adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review