Cited by 589Impact of Technology on AdolescentsGender and Technology in EducationPersonal Information Management and User Behavior

Out of sight is not out of mind: The impact of restricting wireless mobile device use on anxiety levels among low, moderate and high users

Cheever, Nancy A., Rosen, Larry D., Carrier, L. Mark, Chavez, Amber·2014·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.002

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheever, N. A., Rosen, L. D., Carrier, L. M., & Chavez, A.
Affiliations
California State University, Dominguez Hills (US)
Corresponding author
Cheever, Nancy A.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
37
Pages
290-297
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170048087
Cited by
589
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 2
FWCI
80.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
Keywords
wireless mobile devices, mobile phone overuse, anxiety, separation anxiety, university students, device removal, heavy users

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review