The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices
Abstract
Summary During the past 15 years or so, teacher education research has made significant strides in studying the complex relationships between teacher beliefs and practices. This new line of research has generated important findings that are of practical implications for teacher education. This article reviews this small body of research and, in so doing, elucidates the two competing theses (i.e. ‘consistency’ vs ‘inconsistency') that are recurring in the literature on the relationships between teacher beliefs and practices. It begins with an overview of traditional research on teaching in general, followed by a discussion of teacher cognition under which teacher beliefs/theories are subsumed. After introducing the notion of ‘the Missing Paradigm’ in the mainstream teacher education research, the article examines the theoretical frameworks underlying teacher beliefs and practices research. Next it provides a synthesis of recent research on teacher beliefs and practices, addressing critical issues germane to the research findings. After a brief discussion of several critical methodological issues, the article outlines six possible directions for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004 · Cited by 18,546
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317
Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life
Lave, J. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609268 · Cited by 5,148
Research on Teachers' Pedagogical Thoughts, Judgments, Decisions, and Behavior
Shavelson, R. J., & Stern, P. (1981) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543051004455 · Cited by 1,113
O'Brien, D. G., & Stewart, R. A. (1990) · Journal of Reading Behavior · doi:10.1080/10862969009547699 · Cited by 109
Cited by
Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001 · Cited by 2,107
Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2012) · APA educational psychology handbook, Vol 2: Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors. · doi:10.1037/13274-019 · Cited by 991
Teaching To and Through Cultural Diversity
Gay, G. (2013) · Curriculum Inquiry · doi:10.1111/curi.12002 · Cited by 755
Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning
Chan, K.-W., & Elliott, R. G. (2004) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.09.002 · Cited by 640
Pre-service ESL teachers' beliefs about second language learning: a longitudinal study
Peacock, M. (2001) · System · doi:10.1016/s0346-251x(01)00010-0 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Fang, Z.
- Venue
- Educational Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-65
- ISSN
- 0013-1881 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5847
- OpenAlex
- W2110740927
- Cited by
- 1,553
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 53.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0013188960380104
- The paper
- Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188960380104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.