Cited by 55Cardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and TrainingOccupational Health and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The energetics of walking on sand and grass at various speeds

Davies, S. E. H., Mackinnon, S. N.·2006·Ergonomics

Abstract

This study investigated the energetics of walking on sand and grass. Fourteen adult males, participated in the study. Participants had a mean age of 34.6 years old, 72.6 kg in mass and 172.5 cm in stature, who walked at 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 km per h on sand and grass surfaces. Physiological measures included heart rate, O(2) uptake, CO(2) exhalation, ventilation and relative O(2) uptake using a MetaMax Ergospirometer. Speed was controlled in a methodology similar to the 'Multistage 20-m Shuttle Run Test'. Data were collected during physiological steady rate at each determined speed. A minimum of 2 h rest was enforced between randomized conditions. Results indicate that there was a significant increase (p < 0.01) in all measured physiological indices indicative of energy expenditure when walking on sand compared to grass at 3-7 km per h, with the greatest disparity between the surfaces (ratio = 1.63) in relative O(2) consumption at 5 km per h.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00140130600558023

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are several studies that investigated the metabolic rate of locomotion on natural terrains, but they did not focus on the relationship between optimal speed and preferred speed.

    “There are several studies that investigated the metabolic rate of locomotion on natural terrains, but they did not focus on the relationship between optimal speed and preferred speed.”

    From Preferred walking speed on rough terrain: is it all about energetics? (2019) · cites this paper as Davies and Mackinnon, 2006

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Davies S. E.H., 1999, The physiological demands of beach volleyball
  2. Ramaswamy S. S., 1955, Indian Journal of Physiology and Allied Science, 9, 113
  3. Strydom N. B., 1966, Internationale Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Physiologie Einschliesslich Arbeitsphysioogiel, 23, 166

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Davies, S. E. H., & Mackinnon, S. N.
Affiliations
  • a Department of Sports Management , Cape Peninsula University of Technology , Mowbray Campus, 7700, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa
  • b School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland , St. John's, Newfoundland, A1C 5S7, Canada
Venue
Ergonomics
Published
2006-06
Volume
49
Issue
7
Pages
651-660
ISSN
  • 0014-0139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5847
OpenAlex
W2084938936
Cited by
55
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ergonomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Performance
Keywords
energy cost of walking, energy expenditure, walking speed, oxygen consumption, heart rate, surface type, exercise physiology
MeSH terms
Adult, Energy Metabolism, Gait, Poaceae, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Silicon Dioxide, Walking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review